Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well porche has one nice mofo of an engine in its strainght 6 and so does BMW with their m3 straight 6 and so does nissan with the rb's and so does toyota with their 2jz....i can see some sort of trend here...

my bro's 85zx was a 3L v6 but could only make 160hp yet my old supra was a 3L straight 6 and made 200hp! and we all know there's nothing wrong with the power out of nissan engines!

holden has a ***ed up v6 as does the magna so i base all my opinions on the evidence...

Originally posted by Lozza150

If you want a real spin out..... try and find out how a "Rotary" engine works....

Yeah, that's a freaky kinda engine - what was that bloke thinking when he invented them :confused:

http://travel.howstuffworks.com//rotary-engine.htm

Originally posted by djvin

A couple of questions thats slightly off topic,

...

Has any car company made a V4? And would there be any savings in making one?

Yep SAAB made a V4 at the end of the 95/96 model cycle, and Lancia have been making them for decades. What a sweet little donk that is. :uh-huh:

Originally posted by WazR32GTSt

well porche has one nice mofo of an engine in its strainght 6 ...

...

umm that'd be boxer 6 :(

Originally posted by Lozza150

If you want a real spin out..... try and find out how a "Rotary" engine works....

Hehehe Lozza150, took me a while, but I finally got it!

woz the 'a real spin out' an intended pun?

Coz thats really quite nifty...

real spin out - rotary engines...

lol, boy am I slow.... n also amusing myself at the smallest things...

ford made a V4 back in the 70's for the capri, granada and transit and it was a piece of crap of a motor.

porsche never ever made an inline six. they were either a flat six, inline four, flat four or V8. :P

the Wankel roatary engine was originally a design for a water pump. ;)

Originally posted by djvin

Hey red900ss man, ure Avatar is fully sickening man...

That a turbine from a truck or something, looks HUGE!

lol,

Guess thats bolted on to ur Skyline then?

;)

yer it's off a Ship. It's mounted in a box trailer :uh-huh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...