Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi,

Since it was designed for r33 (not neo) and since neo head has slightly different intake ports and AAC valve bolt pattern -- sure it will require more work to install it to neo engine.

But there is nothing impossible.

I love how everyone who has it fitted wont explain what was necessary to make it fit. This is a forum where people share information, so share, please.

Agreed.

Its the same people saying it "can" be done, or they "have" done it. But wont go as far to to share how it was done

OK it is bolt on;

just use a set of fuel rail spacers or R33 GTS-t rail kit, a R33 throttle body and greddy adapter or even better use an infinity item like in my pics. Very simple :dry: no black magic :P just a bit of re-looming to keep it all factory neat.

post-34927-1174340883.jpg

post-34927-1174340904.jpg

post-34927-1174340920.jpg

Edited by URAS

Standard R34NEO injectors I see... that's weird; general concensus a while back was that R33GTST injectors would be needed (top v side feed)

This is interesting; has dispelled a LOT of myths.

My question is this though; you say to use a R33 TB or other one... won't this remove a few components of the R34 since the NEO TB has a massive donk out the front which controls a few things?

Interesting work; well done!

OK it is bolt on;

just use a set of fuel rail spacers or GTR rail kit, a R33 throttle body and greddy adapter or even better use an infinity item like in my pics. Very simple :D no black magic :P just a bit of re-looming to keep it all factory neat.

Very interesting, some questions;

What o’rings/spacers/adaptors are used to fit the R34GTT (top feed) injectors to the R33GTST (side feed) manifold?

Why can’t you use the R34GTT throttle body? The throttle butterfly is the same ID, is it the bolt spacing that’s different? Possible to use/make an adaptor?

What throttle cable is used?

:dry: cheers :huh:

  • 7 months later...

i know its a old post

but trying to do this atm, i got some R33 Fuel rail spacers, but it doesnt seem a tight fit as it should be? did you use anything else? or there something you can do to make it tight?

also need a R33 ACC valve, as 34 one is bigger

Cheers

Justin

forgot to mention you lose traction control (a given since the TB controls it).... i hate it anyway :D

finished one with trac control still working for those that want to keep it.... piping is a nightmare though.

i know its a old post

but trying to do this atm, i got some R33 Fuel rail spacers, but it doesnt seem a tight fit as it should be? did you use anything else? or there something you can do to make it tight?

also need a R33 ACC valve, as 34 one is bigger

Cheers

Justin

in rail or in the manifold?

in manifold, fuel rail is all good, real tight fit. But put the 33 spacers in the manifold and then injectors into the spacers and isnt tight at all unless only pushed in a little bit and its sort of tight, but not like pushing into the stock manifold.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
×
×
  • Create New...