Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gday,

I know this has been covered before and I have searched various posts so I have a fair idea but I want to join the 300rwkw club with a street tune of > 280rwkw.

I currently have an R33 GTS-t S1 with an RB25DET. Mods include:

batmbl split dump/front pipe, high flow 5" cat with 3"center, kakimoto 3"cat-back

Apexi Pod Filter

Hybrid GT spec intercooler

PowerFC with EBC add on

Cold Air Intake to help

So far the car has made a max of 250hp at 12psi. I will be purchasing the following items:

Z32 AFM

555cc Nismo injectors

Walbro fuel pump ESS342

My question lies with which turbo and clutch should I go with? I think I'll keep the factory manifold so that I can make use of the batmbl dump/front pipe. I want it to be suited more for circuit track racing.

Ive searched the RB25 dyno results page and these are the options I found:

GT-RS

Gt3540

T04R

Which will best suit my needs and thanks for everyone who puts input in, I just want best for my car! - Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160502-which-turbo-to-choose/
Share on other sites

2835 would go close.

from your original choices: Gtrs too small, 3540 too big, to4r too big.

Garrett based turbos would see the 3071 go close (same basic turbo as the 2835 but un cropped gt30 exhaust wheel) or the 3076 do it easily with a bit of lag.

2835 wouldn't be able to use a 1 peice dump to suit the stock turbo, neither would and internal gated garrett.

A Garrett GT30 based turbo will get you over the line.

There are loads of threads/posts from discopotato03 on all the variants, characteristics and associated information.

Having a good search of his past posts/threads will give you all the info you will need :rofl:

I wouldnt purchase that walbro, get a decent Bosch pump.

While I respect your opion Nismoid, why not go for the Walbro - from what i know they have a 255L/h flow (above 300rwkw) at 45psi. I herd that whilst it requires a small bracket, strainer and wiring modifications it will run straight off the factory fuel line???

What about using the Garrett 3076 with a hks cast low mount manifold that has been extrude honed (thanks tridentt150v) ?? Should I stick with an internal wastegate or move to an external one?

Again cheers for all the info!

I recently went with a GT3076R, although a touch laggier than I expected (150-200 or so rpm) I can definitely say that I am happy with the mid range indeed. You will find you will need a clutch not soon but fairly shortly after buying your turbo as I am coming up to, not to mention the drivers side window motor, gearbox nicking from 3rd to 4th and a kick in the head needs attending to also.

While I respect your opion Nismoid, why not go for the Walbro - from what i know they have a 255L/h flow (above 300rwkw) at 45psi.

Because i had that exact model and it was totally maxed @ 270rwkw/17psi. AFR's were in the 14 range.

Soon as we dropped a bosch in, AFR's went to the 10's instantly. The pump was correctly wired etc etc.

There are many other people who have had walbros and have encountered similar issues that which i have had, so mine wasnt just a once off unfortunately. Seems they can very much be hit and miss

I recently went with a GT3076R, although a touch laggier than I expected (150-200 or so rpm) I can definitely say that I am happy with the mid range indeed. You will find you will need a clutch not soon but fairly shortly after buying your turbo as I am coming up to, not to mention the drivers side window motor, gearbox nicking from 3rd to 4th and a kick in the head needs attending to also.

when did it hit full boost by? how much power did you make?

What about using the Garrett 3076 with a hks cast low mount manifold that has been extrude honed (thanks tridentt150v) ?? Should I stick with an internal wastegate or move to an external one?

I didn't say to do this set up in my PM, I was just saying what I have done. You will have to work out what you want to do and how to achieve it for yourself. My idea's on how to set up a motor may well be radically different to other peoples thoughts.

While I respect your opion Nismoid, why not go for the Walbro - from what i know they have a 255L/h flow (above 300rwkw) at 45psi. I herd that whilst it requires a small bracket, strainer and wiring modifications it will run straight off the factory fuel line???

If you repsct his opinion then why dont you listen to him?

you will find that when running 550 injectors and a FPR you will need say 42psi base fuel pressure.

then crank 20psi of boost into it to get you to 300 kws and the fuel pressure is now at 62 psi.

this is when the walbro dies in the ass.

if you like your engine lasting once you get up to 270 kws and beyond then sell the walbro and get a 044 and mount it in tank in the same spot as th walbro. still runs on standard fuel lines.

its a no brainer....

I also went the GT30/40 it is quite drivable round town, but when you put the hammer down you better hang on...

Also spend some money on tyres, either buy loads of cheap ones, or get some DOT apporved semi slicks as 270+rwkw becomes tail happy... :rofl:

If you repsct his opinion then why dont you listen to him?

you will find that when running 550 injectors and a FPR you will need say 42psi base fuel pressure.

then crank 20psi of boost into it to get you to 300 kws and the fuel pressure is now at 62 psi.

this is when the walbro dies in the ass.

if you like your engine lasting once you get up to 270 kws and beyond then sell the walbro and get a 044 and mount it in tank in the same spot as th walbro. still runs on standard fuel lines.

its a no brainer....

Or a tomei/nismo etc and direct + wire with relay etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...