Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hmmm, after reading this thread , im almost tempted to go drive a 34. i own a 33 s2 4door gtst and i thought it was quite nimble (it has modified suspension). i do find it a but gutless (160odd rwk with an exhaust). ive driven a s1 and to me it felt 1/2 as good to drive. im very interested to hear more :)

Everyone on here will have a different opinion..best way is to go test drive one urself :(

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hmmm, after reading this thread , im almost tempted to go drive a 34. i own a 33 s2 4door gtst and i thought it was quite nimble (it has modified suspension). i do find it a but gutless (160odd rwk with an exhaust). ive driven a s1 and to me it felt 1/2 as good to drive. im very interested to hear more :P

ive done the upgrade, it takes alittle getting used to but it is indeed a more refined car over all to drive.

The suspension has been upgraded , as well as turbo and kw. im enjoying the drive apart from the interior is my only down side. Investing in leather trim and seats and problem easily fixed with a smile added to to style!

Of course the 34 owners are going to say its an upgrade...

I personally prefer the looks of the 33 (series 2).. the 34 just doesnt do "it" for me..

However every time i look at my 33 i almost mess myself

The 34 was my long term upgrade goal.. but after seeing countless "ugly" ones im no longer interested.. although wouldnt refuse a 34GTR

As mentioned before by sydneykid, it's got about 5 years of technical improvements over the 33, so it's obviously going to be a better car or else nissan's doing something terribly wrong. According to the official nissan brochure, the 34GTT puts out as much power as the original 32 GTR, and has more chassis rigidity than a 33 GTR... remember that's just the R34GTT not the R34GTR. Not to mention better power delivery, traction control, factory xenon headlights, better seats... you can't really argue that the 33's the better car. But you could say you'd save about 10k buying a 33, and spend the difference in mods to get a quicker car.. or something like that.

Ive owned 32 gtst, 33 gtst and now 34 gtt, so that doesn't apply to me.

My preference goes 34 gt-t, 32 gtst and then 33 gtst.

I do agree you can save yourself alot of money and mod the 33 or have a stock 34... but in the long term the 34 is a much better option. Just don't get a friggen 4 door i hate those things lmao *no offense indended to 4 door owners*

some really helpful info!! cheers everyone..

Guess i will have to go test drive both cars..

But this will come down to money in the end.. Something i dont have atm, so will have to see in a few months time!!

Thanks all

I personally prefer the looks of the 33 (series 2).. the 34 just doesnt do "it" for me..

However every time i look at my 33 i almost mess myself

The 34 was my long term upgrade goal.. but after seeing countless "ugly" ones im no longer interested.. although wouldnt refuse a 34GTR

You are in denial. seek treatment.

You are in denial. seek treatment.

nope its called choice... its this wonderful thing that allows us to have differing opinions..

how boring this world would be if we all loved the same thing..

I didnt say the 34 wasn't a newer/fresher/better car.. its purely asthetics for me..

I Prefer the look of the R33 (s2) over the R34..

same way i prefer the look of a VE SS over a XR6... even though im a ford man

As mentioned before by sydneykid, it's got about 5 years of technical improvements over the 33, so it's obviously going to be a better car or else nissan's doing something terribly wrong. According to the official nissan brochure, the 34GTT puts out as much power as the original 32 GTR, and has more chassis rigidity than a 33 GTR... remember that's just the R34GTT not the R34GTR. Not to mention better power delivery, traction control, factory xenon headlights, better seats... you can't really argue that the 33's the better car. But you could say you'd save about 10k buying a 33, and spend the difference in mods to get a quicker car.. or something like that.

Going by that theory, how come people keep arguing that old 32s are better than 33s?

Cheers

Chris

Driven the 34 gtt and 33 gts-t own a 33 GTR

34 did seem a much better package and more modern, everything felt more refined than the 33 GTS-T's I've driven. However the extra power, traction and cornering ability of the stock 33 GT-R moved me to it. You pay more for a GT-R but it is a jap "super" car, a gts-t is mearly a fun car in comparison. If you are seriously modding then things might be different.

There are numerous r33 Gts-t's Doing 10's without stroker kits or nos.... I mean how much further do you want to go for a street car? Having gone from a R33 gtst 4 door manual to a R33 gtr then back to my current R33 gtst i have no regrets... you dont need a gtr to get great power and great times. but i do agree on the R34 front, beautiful car to drive, just feels like a better car.

Too right... it doesn't mean it's 'better'. I mean you could argue many points for and against an R34, but the specific question was - does the 34 feel better to drive than the 33... and the answer to that question, is yes. If you're asking what's more pretty, or what has more chick pulling power.. than that's all subjective. Comparisons between 32 and 33's have been more emotional on these forums than logical in most cases.

but the specific question was - does the 34 feel better to drive than the 33... and the answer to that question, is yes.

actually the original topic was "have you upgraded to a R34 from a R33?"

There is no specific answer.. unless you have indeed "upgraded" from the 33 to a 34..

I use upgraded lightly.. as sure.. engine/handling/interior may be more modern.. but looks and other things are all subjective

I own an r33 gts-t and have driven an r34gtt. I prefer the r34 slightly in every department but would not pay the extra money for one. Saying that my mates S2 r33 was very similar ride and feel to the r34, so I reckon just keep the series 2 if your already happy with it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 馃槓
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
  • Create New...