Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

don't think its got anything to do with which series you got... I get on average 390-450 per tank.

I also did Adelaide to Perth when I first bought the car and the best it did was 520 with an eighth of a tank lef and doing 120kms/ph... and I'm guessing that was on stock boost as some twit had disconnected the EBC.

I have

SAFCII

Greddy EBC

Metal Cat

3" cat back

always run on BP 98 Ultimate

toyo tyres

running on 10psi

And I have fun sometimes. its hard to stay off boost. :laugh:

my 1st choice of fuel was bp ultimate but of late i've been using vpower i think i'ts improved economy & possibly performance,regulary get 450 to 500 plus

I switched from bp ultimate to shell vpower a few months ago and noticed my car ran richer, and not as smooth. It was ok at first but eventually I figured my car just didn't run as well as with bp. So I've since switched back to bp ultimate and couldn't be happier. I basically just wanted the savings from the fuel dockets to get 4c a litre off with shell, but noticed that bp was often about 2c a litre cheaper anyway where I live. I'm not a fan of the whole fuel discounts thing - it just means they bump up their prices to accommodate it, and therefore rip off those that dont have dockets on hand...

In my experience bp gives better performance and just makes the car run smoother and generally better all-round.

Fuel economy was about the same on both, couldn't really pick any difference there.

I had my car tuned on bp ultimate - not sure if that would make a difference...it could have affected timing I guess, which at that stage was not advanced at all.

Edited by pixel8r
I switched from bp ultimate to shell vpower a few months ago and noticed my car ran richer, and not as smooth. It was ok at first but eventually I figured my car just didn't run as well as with bp. So I've since switched back to bp ultimate and couldn't be happier. I basically just wanted the savings from the fuel dockets to get 4c a litre off with shell, but noticed that bp was often about 2c a litre cheaper anyway where I live. I'm not a fan of the whole fuel discounts thing - it just means they bump up their prices to accommodate it, and therefore rip off those that dont have dockets on hand...

In my experience bp gives better performance and just makes the car run smoother and generally better all-round.

Fuel economy was about the same on both, couldn't really pick any difference there.

I had my car tuned on bp ultimate - not sure if that would make a difference...it could have affected timing I guess, which at that stage was not advanced at all.

Yea me too. When i first got the car i tried 3 different fuel. Bp, shell and Mobil. I found mobil to be the best of all. It gave most power amongst the 3. My car was tuned on mobil98 . Ben from Rcepace gave me the option of using wither mobil or Bp and i chosed Mobil.After the tune i ran with boost 98 and i cant pick the difference other than the price.

With boost 98 with a/c pn 80% of the time mixed in city driving and HWY (30%-70%) im getting about 430-450km/tank). The car after tune is pumping out 236kw@wheels. So its not bad for the fuel consumption.

  • 6 months later...

i found with every car ive had that making sure ur engine is running as good as possible is the key to fuel economy. always check ur coils and spark plugs r in good order, ur tune is spot on and always use a quality filters (oil,air and fuel) always replacing them at required intervals (or a little sooner).

oh and dont carry around crap for no reason. always remember to keep weight as low as possible. depending on how bigger concern economy is u may want to stop using the drive thru window, u'll save fuel and wont get fat from junk food :)

Im using baldwon filters and i think repcos fuel filter. As for air filter im suing K&n drop in replacement filters which runs great with the car. Oil wise im using Castrol cos Ben from racpace wanted to use it. I personally like using Mobil synthetic. Im currently using Castrol 10w-70.

10W70 holy molasses batman !

yeah we are definately running thinner than that .. but I will check for sure.

now.. can someome educate me as to WHY the fuel filter could be causing poor consumption?

I am not saying that its not a valid possiblity but just want to know the reasoning behind it.

Im using baldwon filters and i think repcos fuel filter. As for air filter im suing K&n drop in replacement filters which runs great with the car. Oil wise im using Castrol cos Ben from racpace wanted to use it. I personally like using Mobil synthetic. Im currently using Castrol 10w-70.

yeah I too am debating the S2 myth that it gets better economy.

we have an s2 and can just get 400k till the fill light comes on

we ( stagea owners ) might need to get a bit more methodical about what fix made what fuel econ difference. ( ie start logging it all in this thread etc )

also doesnt really seem like anyone in here has confirmed the working operation of their o2 sensors.

I am close to finally getting off my ass and getting my consult to see if it can read the operation of the o2 sensor while moving etc.

S2 here as well and am only getting 400kms before the light goes up which is around 60L (15L/100km). I would be far happier with 450kms (13.5L/100km) before light if possible. Running hi flow panel filter with TT mbc @ 10psi as the only mods. That's with Boost98 too.

I replaced the O2 sensor with the NGK/NTK one and when the car was in the workshop the other day they tested the O2 levels (or was it CO2?) to check air fuel mixture by sticking a rod into the exhaust connected to a handheld electrical meter thingy while driving around and all the readings were fine. Does that mean the O2 sensor is alright?

Been quoted $500 and for a custom 3" mild steel catback exhaust, very tempting if it guarantees drop of 1-2L/100kms.

yeah I too am debating the S2 myth that it gets better economy.

we have an s2 and can just get 400k till the fill light comes on

we ( stagea owners ) might need to get a bit more methodical about what fix made what fuel econ difference. ( ie start logging it all in this thread etc )

also doesnt really seem like anyone in here has confirmed the working operation of their o2 sensors.

I am close to finally getting off my ass and getting my consult to see if it can read the operation of the o2 sensor while moving etc.

Edited by webng

Well.. i now know the car runs exactly 419.5kms on a full tank of Boost98... the missus couldn't start it this evening as it had run out of petrol. It equates to 15-16L/100kms which in my books is still disgracefull seeing she uses the car 90% of the time and it'd be lucky to see more then 2psi. That was with a bottle of Nulon Injector cleaner in it too.

yeah thats pretty damned poor hey?

One thing I cant seem to get out of anyone are a few things

how many people can categorically say they have a working o2 sensor ?

Ie .. its been checked by reading fluctiating values from the sensor etc.

Another thing I want to know is what is the supposed fuel economy of the stagea

when it came out of the factory? Maybe it was woeful from the very begining and

we are just chasing our tails?

Well.. i now know the car runs exactly 419.5kms on a full tank of Boost98... the missus couldn't start it this evening as it had run out of petrol. It equates to 15-16L/100kms which in my books is still disgracefull seeing she uses the car 90% of the time and it'd be lucky to see more then 2psi. That was with a bottle of Nulon Injector cleaner in it too.
Another thing I want to know is what is the supposed fuel economy of the stagea when it came out of the factory? Maybe it was woeful from the very begining and

we are just chasing our tails?

That's something that would be good to find out. Anyone here know the Stagea factory mileage?

ok....i have a page that i found i hope this helps a little

RS FOUR, PRODUCED FROM 1996 (SEPTEMBER)

-Fuel consumption l/100 = 12.9

RS FOUR, PRODUCED FROM 1997 (JANUARY)

-fuel consumption at 10-15 modes, l/100km = 12.9

25t RS FOUR, PRODUCED FROM 1997 (AUGUST)

-Fuel consumption at 10-15 modes, l/100km = 12.9

25RS FOUR, PRODUCED FROM 1997 (NOVEMBER)

-fuel consumption at 10-15 modes, l/100km = 12.1

25t RS FOUR V, PRODUCED FROM 1998 (AUGUST)

- Fuel consumption at 10-15 modes, l/100km= 11.3

25t RS FOUR S, produced from 1998 (august)

- Fuel consumption at 10-15 modes, l/100km = 10.6

25t RS FOUR V Produced from 2000 (june)

- Fuel consumption at 10-15 modes, l/100km =11.3

25t RS FOUR S, produced from 2000 (june)

- Fuel consumption at 10-15 modes, l/100km =10.6

25RRS FOUR, produced from 2001 (april)

- Fuel consumption at 10-15 modes, l/100km =11.1

ok....i have a page that i found i hope this helps a little

25t RS FOUR S, produced from 1998 (august)

- Fuel consumption at 10-15 modes, l/100km = 10.6

Harrah!!!.... I own the most ecconomical stagea possible..... :no:

420-460 repeatedable around town/short freeway/hills

10.5L/100 has been done on the GOR/Otways/FWY

worse economey when i am just using it for general running around coz its all short trips with speed humps/roundabouts.

now.. can someome educate me as to WHY the fuel filter could be causing poor consumption?

I am not saying that its not a valid possiblity but just want to know the reasoning behind it.

i've never seen any proof that a fuel filter can effect fuel economy. but its cheap insurance against leaning ur engine out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Howdy friends, So another weird one today, I was looking into replacing some broken clips holding the front grille for the R32 GTR (part number 01553-03831), and noticed the brackets which are supposed to hold the grille in place were also missing 😑. I do recall seeing this issue many years ago, but didn't fix it at the time. A quick look on eBay and I was able to find the genuine brackets, along with all the screws which suited the headlights (part numbers 26042-08U05,26092-08U05). Happy days!....  Once they arrived however there was an extra nut in the packaging which implied that there should also be a bolt or a stud, and sure enough, after a bit of searching I found this thread from 2013, and @Ants clearly shows a stud should be present. Reading around a bit more, it's possible the headlights on my car are the "povo pack" headlights as mentioned by @funkymonkey in this thread way back in 2008. This could explain why the studs are missing on my set of headlights. Looking at the headlight diagram I wasn't able to see a suitable part number for the stud itself. The headlight did indeed have a recess that looked like it would accept a stud, but interestingly no thread or anything obvious how the stud would be affixed to the headlight, I suspect it may have been glued in, press fit, or melted into the plastic at the factory. Another member may be able to clarify if they happen to have a genuine set of N1 headlamps. The only thing we have to work with within the recess is a keyway which likely is there to prevent the stud from rotating within the recess. In any case, back to 3D printing, I put together a model which acts like a pug with a friction fit inside this recess, making use of the keyway so it doesn't rotate while tightening a bolt. Printing in TPU will allow it to slightly swell making a nice snug fit without cracking the part. I've designed the adaptor it to accept an 20 mm M6 bolt (stainless with a cap head in my case), as opposed to the standard M5 stud and I made use of the standard galvanised split washer that came with the genuine brackets from Nissan. Once the bolt and screws were all in place, giving the bracket a gentle shake gave the classic "shaking the car" feeling, very solid, which gives me confidence this is going to be able to hold on much better than the janky solution which seems to have been here for the past decade or so. Overall I'm really pleased with how this turned out and maybe there are more people out there running these headlights without a centre stud at all! Link to the freely available model on Printables: Click here Regards, Sean  
    • Hey everyone, This is my first post apart of the introduction. I tried searching a bit on the forum but couldn't really get a straight answer. I got the car to my mechanic as I felt it being weak. It seems that it was missing on two cylinders due to the injectors. I had all my injectors clean and the car runs much better. The mechanic also confirmed my suspicions that the cat is clogged and needs to be tackled asap. The cat rattles a bit and the hot exhaust warning frequently lights up when driving after getting the injectors clean. In my introduction I was asked about what modification I might be interested in and mentioned a cat delete. From what I was told, this is not really beneficial on the RB20DE and there are more cons than pros.  Could perhaps anyone give some suggestions on what the best course of action would be since the current cat is toast and needs to be removed/replaced anyway? I can also sometimes smell a strong smell of fuel, but I'm not sure if this is related.
    • Hope the cans went down well at least 
    • 255 can't go wrong with the price.
    • When I was replacing my pump due to being stranded in the wrong state, I went with the Deatschwerks 320lph kit. It is a direct plug in to the stock wires, harness, everything. It comes with a plug... but you can plug the OEM plug directly into this thing. https://justjap.com/products/deatschwerks-dw300-fuel-pump-nissan-s13-silvia-r32-r33-r34-skyline-c34-stagea?currency=AUD Downside: Won't actually flow that much on boost if you want to push it on E85, but it's comparable to the 040/255 etc. Little more actually.
×
×
  • Create New...