Jump to content
SAU Community

Are you interested in a custom modified PFC to suit your RB20 and RB25?  

336 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

No more f**king around with Airflow curves, and Maf settings, as MAP sensors are universal on all cars as they only read pressure, regardless of pipe size, etc.

Any one have a djetro base map I can check out via the datalogit?

The afm pfc averages the two afm values and then derives the load value via a 32k constant. The single afm pfc's simply use a single afm value to derive load via a 16k constant.

I assume the djetro rb26 pfc runs to map sensors due to the rb26's individual throttle body's for each port. On the rb25 no doubt a single map bridged would do the trick. But why bother.. Just buy the kit. :happy:

Mafia.. Very keen to see the rb20 and rb30 back to back. The hks3037ProS would = poo on the rb20 unless you run the .6 scroll. :(

I have the full RB26 DJETRO manual at home. I can scan it for you paul.

basically the map sensor nipples are inserted into cylinders 3 and 4 of the throttle bridge for the 26. then their loom runs to the side port on the PFC, and also splices into the ecu harness (I assume into the two AFM signal wires).

I don't know how much better or worse PFC DJETRO is than the LJETRO. like paul said once you are at target boost the maps output just hold a flat line even though the acutal volume of air going in will increase. so I guess more reliance is placed on RPM axis and maybe TPS etc.

hey if you can scan that manual that would be great. ive seen where it taps into the boost control port, i suspect this is for power source for the map sensors.

so the map sensor connect to the AFM inputs on the loom, that makes sense. ive had a look and even discussion on the datalogit forums its still a 2d map so its purely load and rpm so TPS is used to move the load axis around.

Don't forget the inlet air temp sensors Mafia.. A critical part of a MAP based ECU if you want it to run half decently.

Im still under the impression load is derived purely from air temp and values received from the map sensors.

TPS.. I can't see it being useful for determining load especially on a forced induction motor.

I know somone has propably said this somwher along the line, but there is a new PFC for R33 due out for release late december early to mid feb 2008.

My source, a good mate in Japan who works in the industry.

Apparantly all the models using the old NEC chip have been changed to use a new LG manufactured chip.

Any one have a djetro base map I can check out via the datalogit?

The afm pfc averages the two afm values and then derives the load value via a 32k constant. The single afm pfc's simply use a single afm value to derive load via a 16k constant.

I assume the djetro rb26 pfc runs to map sensors due to the rb26's individual throttle body's for each port. On the rb25 no doubt a single map bridged would do the trick. But why bother.. Just buy the kit. :P

Mafia.. Very keen to see the rb20 and rb30 back to back. The hks3037ProS would = poo on the rb20 unless you run the .6 scroll. :)

Yeah, you're right, they need two map sensors to average between the inlet runners. I forgot they'd need to put them there because of the multi throttle body design.

Surely I can just plumb both map sensors into the RB25 intake plenum and have no problems?

Regarding the HKs 30307 - His has the 0.63 HKS rear on it, and its clearly smaller than my rear. Not sure why, but interesting. Laggy as dog shit in the RB20 though, especially with the RB20 stock ECU untuned..

Don't forget the inlet air temp sensors Mafia.. A critical part of a MAP based ECU if you want it to run half decently.

Im still under the impression load is derived purely from air temp and values received from the map sensors.

TPS.. I can't see it being useful for determining load especially on a forced induction motor.

Also, I hadn't forgot about the temp sensor, as map sensors require this data heavily. Weird how the powerfc uses this data though? As they are just sending a signal into the AFM wires.? Might have to investigate this a little more. Still curious to know why it also needs to be hooked up to the Cylinder 3 and 4 wires. Sounds like a ghetto way of using map sensors.

the datalogit guys disected the load axis calc and it just uses map sensor pimv instead of the afm volt and the same style CONST number calc

Can you speak engrish?

I know somone has propably said this somwher along the line, but there is a new PFC for R33 due out for release late december early to mid feb 2008.

My source, a good mate in Japan who works in the industry.

Apparantly all the models using the old NEC chip have been changed to use a new LG manufactured chip.

Will they have a few extra features like Ignition cut and Launch control?

That would be great :rofl::):P

Also, I hadn't forgot about the temp sensor, as map sensors require this data heavily. Weird how the powerfc uses this data though? As they are just sending a signal into the AFM wires.? Might have to investigate this a little more. Still curious to know why it also needs to be hooked up to the Cylinder 3 and 4 wires.

they don't tap into the cylinder 3 and 4 wires. I don't know where you are getting that from. there is no such thing as cylinder 3 and 4 AFM wires. there are only two AFMS in a stock GTR. AFM1 and AFM2. the Map sensors are spliced into AFM1 and AFM2 ecu inputs.

and yes you should be fine to place the sensors elsewhere in your GTST but I'm sure there will need to be a little thought about where is the best placement in order to get a good result.

other than that it should be fine.

Hay my egrish wrocks. LOL.

Sorry i am a terrible speller, person thing.

LOL

Not sure about additional features, but i know that the other boards are looking at an upgrade to the new chips as well, but i can do a little more digging through my friend for you.

they don't tap into the cylinder 3 and 4 wires. I don't know where you are getting that from. there is no such thing as cylinder 3 and 4 AFM wires. there are only two AFMS in a stock GTR. AFM1 and AFM2. the Map sensors are spliced into AFM1 and AFM2 ecu inputs.

ahh pual said something a few posts back, but I see what you mean now. Maybe I misread?

Ok, one more question - Does the Cefiro have a different wiring loom than the RB20? Or is it exactly the same, and our new wiring scheme will work? Doing one for a mate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...