Jump to content
SAU Community

Are you interested in a custom modified PFC to suit your RB20 and RB25?  

336 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I have a R32 GTS-t in the workshop at the moment, I was originally going to supply him with an AP PFC, however the one supplier I know that has one wants to sell it stupidly

expensive ($2300). I have converted a GTR RB26 PFC for him, I only just got it going, it seems to be working fine. Im going to tune it today, ill let you know how it goes. I can

definately say it is 100% possible.

paulr33, im looking into the R33 schematics at the moment for the VCT, if I have any info on it ill make sure I let you know.

Cheers

Rob

Rob,

You're a f**king legend.

Thank you so much for getting involved.

hi rob,

yeah it was nick, i spoke with him last night.

i would like to see the car running just to confirm a few things for my loom.

do you see any issues in me looking (and copying) the base tune date once you guys have done the base stuff?

i am interested in base injector, airflow ramps and stock maps. i can generate them myself if need be.

is he using gtr injectors or stock rb20 ones

there is no ETA. please be patient. my car gets fixed today so i can actuall test and try stuff.

i have the 26 FC at home and my R33. we have come across another potential issue with the 02 sensor setup

as the GTR doesnt run heater but the 32/33 GTST does so it may not work, that is there may be no 02 feedback

don't worry, I'm nudging him :P

I have a powerfc pro here for a GTR that I want in my car asap.

Cubes, Paul also send me your Loom comparison excel spreadsheet. Done well.

Paul, its got to work, because the AP engineering guys obviously worked it out. Maybe a AP engineering ECU as reference to see what they did?

no they grab the older style 25 PFC

it runs 2.3 i am pretty sure and uses N001 hand controller

they edit the internal version, change the map data, injector flip, change the afm ramp and inj settings and remove VCT

Hey paul,

I've been double checking a few things and the fuel pump flow control has stood out as being a problem.

First up how the fuel pump is controlled by the GTST's.

The GTST's essentially run a basic dropping resistor and relay (they call fpcm) that is activated by the ecu to earth the pump out and bypass the dropping resistor resulting in high voltage to the pump.

The R33 and R32 GTST ecu's have pinout 104 activated constantly which is why we loose the high/low function with a pfc in the gtst's.

The GTR's do away with the dropping resistor in favour of 2 ecu pinouts for the high/low control and a 'real' fpcm (fuel pump control module). Essentially the fpcm is a relay thats earthed and resistor thats earthed all in one. It receives a signal from the ecu via pinouts 104 or 106 and activates the associated circuit. One being the straight relay earth the other being the resistored earth.

So whats what?!?! :)

We really need to remove pinouts 104 and 106 and see what they are doing. I would assume as the fuel pump goes high one is off the other is on and as the fuel pump goes low its vice versa.

Which will cause problems with fuel pump control on both prime and running.

----

I think the answer is maybe one or both of the below.

1. Simply bridge ecu pin outs 104 and 106 so the gtst's relay (fpcm) is always active.

2. The fuel pump receives its voltage via a relay that is activated by the ignition switch and the ecu earthing out. So simply splice in to the fuel pumps voltage feed and using it as a trigger for a negatively earthed relay.

When the ignition key is turned the ecu earths its self out activating the new negatively earthed relay; as the fuel pump is now earthed it will run.

I would hope it doesn't cause problems with prime. I would assume not going by the wiring diagrams.

I've pulled the wiring diagrams out of the engine manuals; next time your on msn i'll send them on over to you to have a look.

thanks for the info, i am reluctant to try anything more at the risk of frying my car of the FC itself

i tried it last night, had a constant reboot cycle on the car and hand controller and the fuel pump kept restarting

created; what did u guys do for fuel pump control ?

i am no longer doing this project. i tried it last night and was faced with some possible big risks so im not prepared to continue.

i will sell my 26 FC and the loom adapter if anyone wants to continue or use it for other purposes.

the loom adapater is an inline adapter for Rb26 or Rb26 or Rb25 to Rb25

we have cut all of the other excess junk from it so it suits rb25, all of auto signals have been cut so its only manual loom

ecu is for sale here

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=169959

anyone interested in the loom?

it can be used for any type of inline patching or hacking etc

ive gone and cut all the auto and non related wires to suit rb26

paul using stock rb20 injectors atm...

Car is running fine atm no probs but will see with a few more days of driving, but so far so good.....

And thanks again Rob and Danny at CREATD.....legends :P

Hey Nick, hows the car running?

are you able to get good economy out of it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...