Jump to content
SAU Community

Installed Hids On My R33!


sl33ek
 Share

Recommended Posts

no-one really answered this but you can get oem zenon headlight for r33 series 2's. they were only avaliable in the late series 2 models, i had some on the shell i just bought but they were f*ked so i cant use them, got a quote on brand new ones and they are $1300ish each light, and good luck finiding them second hand probably anyone whos got em dun know, and if they doo i wouldnt ever be selling them

Hey man, yeah, those were teh very last of the series 2, i think some people even refer to them as series 3

really hard to find the lights though, I found some but they wanted $1800USD for them :S so screw that, I'd rather spend them on a new car

Also the bonnet is a different shape for the xenon ones, they do look mint though, they are found on most of the later model R33 GTRs but only a few of the GTS25ts :S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

damn i didnt realise the bonnet was a different shape, mines a gtst but the bonnet is rooted, but so are the headlights so i guess when i put it all back together its going to be standard. i've heard of them called series 3 gtr headlights but i didnt realise these were the same as the gtst ones. you can get them brand new but who wants to pay 2600 for a pair of headlight, i can think of better things to spend my money on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah man 2600 is way way way too much :nyaanyaa:

I reckon get a set of Series 2 headlights if your current ones are smashed

get one or two sets of Bixenon BMW headlights :thumbsup:

retrofit them, then get the pits sanded out of the headlight plastic and you'll be set :rofl:

head over to HIDplanet.com

or GTR.co.uk and find the guy from Abbey Motorsport who did dual xenon conversion on his 33, it looks absolutely mint

Two lights on at normal beam and at high, the shrouds move to the rear of the lense and open up to full beam :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MANWHORE, the camera probably doesnt do the lights justice as the light is effected by the flash and lens of the camera which adds to the "halo" effect. so they probably arent that bad! plus if they were that bad people wouldnt be able to buy them off the self and install them!

anyway i think they look good!

:whistling:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just don't crash :)

they are illegal and if you are found with them in your car when you have an accident, the insurance company won't insure you, they'll try blame the crash on the fact that your lights "dazzled" the other driver

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...