Jump to content
SAU Community

Hks Gt2530/2535


Recommended Posts

I know a lot has been written about HKS turbos, done the search and read whats been said,

but, so much of whats written is stuff like "ive heard" or "so and so's car makes xxxkw" Mostly hear say info on these turbos.

Please post only if you've had direct experience with these turbos, and facts not hear say:-

1. On an RB25 what power can you make at the wheels, whilst running "efficient" boost ie, not stretching to the limit, with a 2530 and the 2535? -plz post boost with power figs.

2. When does boost start, and when is full boost hit for each of these turbos?

3. I hear that the 2530 is a really good turbo for street, is this still the same for the slightly bigger 2535? (as i hear that the 2540 is a bit too laggy).

I'm trying to get all the facts sorted as i'm about to purchase one or the other. (yes i've thought about high flows, GCG etc, but am going for HKS)

THANKS, SLY33

PS, REV210- not interested in hearing that these turbos will only make their "rated" power at the engine, as there are too many of them making way more than that :D -but by the way congrats on your time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JMS has a GT2510 on a R32 making 220od RWKW 1.3bar.

Tilbrook has also had a GT2530 on a RB20DET making 220rwkw at 17psi Tilbrooks told me the GT2530 made full boost at around 3700rpm on the RB20DET.

The HKS turbo's are more efficient at higher boost levels compared to the same HP Garret unit. Hence why the HKS make more power.

My info is probably useless to you but may give you some idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi SLY33, no experience with 2535's, but we find 2530's to be really good. Single for 230 rwkw or twins for 390 rwkw has been our exerience and good power spread as well.

If you are going to run a fair bit of boost (more than 1.3 bar) then HKS turbos are very hard to beat. But you will have to do a lot of support systems upgrading to take advantage of their good performance at the high boost levels. I strongly suggest you think about how much power you are targeting at what boost and then work out the budget for the project. You may find that you are spending money on a "high boost" turbo and that the support systems to take advantage of that turbo are outside your budget.

We see this lots of times with uncompleted projects where the owner has run out of money to finish the job and ends up with a dog of car that doesn't run properly.

Hope that helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also very interested in this topic as I'm running an RB20DET with a T3/T4 GCG modified R33 turbo and am having surging problems. I'm sick of messing around and am now looking into a HKS GT2530 as I'm told ( by all in Japan ) that it's the perfect turbo match for the RB20DET and the HKS GT2535 for the RB25DET. Unfortunatley I too have heard nothing while in Aus about the pro's and con's. P.S. What's a good price for a GT2530 new?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi FAT32, I am really concerned with your comment "I'm running an RB20DET with a T3/T4 GCG modified R33 turbo and am having surging problems". We have around 10 cars (both RB20 and RB25) running GCG hi flow RB25DET turbos and none of them exhibit any surging. They range in output from 190 rwkw to 260 rwkw and have a multitude of different support systems for the turbo's (big I/C', std I/C's, hi lift camshafts, std camshafts, split dumps, combined dumps, Power FC's, Chipped Std ECU's etc etc).

Consequently I would be most interested in your set up as there must be something/s unique causing this problem. I also suspect that if you are having a surging problem with your hi flow then it will still be there with a 2530.

Further details would be a great help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joel,

On a cool / cold day on part throttle going up a hill with boost I get a rapid choofing noise and the boost gauge bounces around then the power dies off. I then have to pull it back a gear a nail it as it seems that I need revs to swallow the air that the compressor is supplying. I also get minor surging when I nail it from about 4500rpm to 6000rpm then it just pegs 1.2bar and climbs to rev cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joel, yes, only on cool to cold temp days.

KamikazeR33, afm has been checked and seems OK although it is maxed out at the top end it doesn't cause any specific problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Hks gt2535 has a fair amount more lag than the standard unit. In my application it is fitted to an rb20 using a front mount cooler (lots of pipe work ), matching dump pipe ect. ect.

3000rpm is 5psi

4000rpm is 15psi

and 4400 rpm is 18 psi

It has a .60 comp housing and .64 exhaust housing.

The set up has made 196 rwkw at 1.3 bar on

2 different dynos in sydney both on hot days (35+ in dyno cell). This figure does seem a little low but really only when compared to the tilbrook dyno figures for the same set up.

Tim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still running standard BOV at the moment but have a blitz one to put on when I can get some time to get a recirculating pipe made up. Tried running with the blitz externally venting and it still surges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FAT32,

We have experienced surging on a RB20DET with a T3/4 combo and it took the turbo supplier 3 goes to get the combination right. We suspect the turbine side wasn’t adequately upgraded which meant the upgraded compressor was supplied with excessive work at a certain engine operating point. This caused the compressor wheel to rotate at an excessive rpm (higher boost) for the air consumed by the engine which is what you described.

Trouble is that the RB20DET has a smaller swept volume at lower rpm and if the turbo isn’t matched correctly the compressor will operate out of it’s pressure/airflow region and all sorts of converging/diverging pressure waves will be generated in the inlet tract. Not a good thing I can assure you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks much for that info.

Since my last post I've been contacted by GCG who have suggested that I have a Stg.2 turbine wheel in my setup and that I should have a Stg.1 wheel to better suit an RB20DET for that exact reason ( although they won't admit fault or prior knowledge ). Looks like it's coming off again.

Although I would love to fit a GT2530, I don't think the extra costs associated would justify the increase in power IF my turbo surging problem gets fixed by GCG. Mant thanks to those who have help out with info relating to my problem. Will post again when I try the turbo for the 3rd time.

Scott.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Latest Posts

    • Right.  I'll try my best at a concise "bring you up to speed" on stuff that may be missing here - obviously open to questions or further input from others as relevant. Here's a datalog from a responsive turbo setup with electronic boost control being used a bit, to keep it simple I've marked 3 points of interest.  All of these charts are on the same time scale on the X-axis, so you can reference what engine rpm is doing in the top graph, boost and EMAP (exhaust backpressure) in the second graph, and turbo rpm in the bottom graph. A) The turbo gets it's power from exhaust gas, and pumping air takes work.  As a result you can't just spin a turbo with a fixed amount of exhaust energy and expect it to keep spooling - the bigger the turbo (ie, the more air it can push) the more exhaust energy you need to drive it.   The most obvious ways of getting more exhaust energy are by adding displacement, adding boost, or adding rpm - but as you add any of these the turbo also needs to do a bit more work so there is a big balance of these things needed to even get to your target boost and sometimes that's not even possible. What you can see in step "A" is that there isn't enough engine rpm or boost to reach the level we want, so this is where "lag" is.  The dyno run continues and rpm increases, which gives enough energy to increase boost, which helps spool  the turbine speed up even more - so you can see that the rate that the boost (and turbo speed) are starting to ramp up faster than the engine rpm is, so turbo is really starting to wake up as the graph gets closer to point B....   B) At this point we've been able to reach the boost that is actually desired at this point.   To stop the boost from going further than this the wastegate will open and bypass gas past the turbine, meaning it doesn't continue accelerating at the point it was before but instead carry on at a more progressive rate which matches what the engine needs.   The wastegate will have a spring in it which is rated to a specific pressure where it will start bypassing, but electronic boost control (managed by the ECU) can adjust how much pressure the spring sees in order to allow some tunability on how much boost the wastegate actually sees, and therefore how much exhaust it bypasses.   The tune in this case stops boost from ramping up HARD at around 21-22psi just before 4000rpm, then as the rpm continue it allows boost to continue up to around 25psi higher in the rpm.   You can see the turbo speed fairly steadily increases through the rpm to ensure it's keeping up with the increasing airflow demand due to the engine speed being higher and boost being pretty steady.   If the boost dropped off after a point then you may see the turbo speed level off or even drop.   C) You can see that despite the boost pressure staying pretty flat here, the exhaust pressure is steadily increasing and at this stage has overtaken boost pressure.   This isn't unusual, and is largely as a result of the increasing energy needed by the turbo to pump more and more air to suit the needs of the engine as it revs out further.   There are a bunch of variables in regards to how much back pressure there will be on a given turbo etc, but its one of the factors we manage when sizing and tuning a turbo setup.   When exhaust back pressure starts exceeding boost pressure you will eventually start seeing signs that the turbo is running out, the engine gets less keen to make more power and it gets harder to raise boost further. In this case it's a fairly acceptable compromise for the power level (around 630kw on a 3litre engine with full boost by 4000rpm), but you'd not want to push it a lot harder than this.  The maximum speed rated for the compressor wheel on this setup is around 125,000rpm so you can see its starting to get close on that side as well - I feel like this kind of illustrates some of the turbo related things we both decide on how far to push, and are also limited to how far we can push depending on the parts combination. Hope this helps more than it confuses things  
    • For that influx of Spammers we had I made no pic posting and no PM's for first ten posts. This is group based and I've manually updated @Beanie to the Members group which will open up the images and PM's. 
    • Thx for the reassuring reply. I’ve got above legal clearance  going in for roadworthy Friday… fingers crossed it’s keeping me awake  bloody nanny state 
    • I was actually going to try and dig out a datalog with turbine speed and EMAP haha
    • Wait until @Lithium posts a compressor map and tries to explain what's going on. There is a strong possibility that the OP lives in a digital world and is not comfortable with analogue machines. A turbo is just about as analogue as it gets, with plenty of non-linear behaviours added in on top. Most of us who think we know how they work are actually only getting by on 2nd and 3rd order mental models that abstract away from the actual physics and bring it back to the sort of kindergarten level concepts we can hold in our heads. This is important when you need to hold 10 such concepts in your head at the same time. You need to reduce the complexity of the individual concepts to allow them to be simultaneously held and manipulated. Too much complexity in the base models makes it very difficult to make them work with each other mentally.
×
×
  • Create New...