Jump to content
SAU Community

R32 Gtr, R33 Gtr Or R34 Gtt

GTAAAH
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

sewid Grand Master

sewid

Posted
Posted
Agreed with above comments on 34 interior.

R33s dont have a stronger motor, more powerful yes. I dont think there's much in the interior's, the 33 is too spacey for my liking but yes its a good point its a newer car thus will always have less problems unless the r32 has been built (not just the motor).

Yes the R33 does have a stronger motor over say an early R32. For a start the need to fix the crank collar issue is gone in the R33 and secondly it's a newer motor.

In my opinion the R33 GTR is a superior car in terms of everything than the R32 and R34 GT-t except maybe personal preference for looks. I personally think a clean series 3 R33 GTR is a far better car in every respect to an R32 or R34 GT-t but that is personal taste.

jazza08 Mentor

jazza08

Posted
Posted (edited)
Yes the R33 does have a stronger motor over say an early R32. For a start the need to fix the crank collar issue is gone in the R33 and secondly it's a newer motor.

Someone went off-topic on the GTR onto the GTST's.

So i was refering to the rb20 vs rb25 in which i dont believe an rb25 is any stronger from owning both an rb20, rb25 and neo rb25.

In regards to the GTR i can't say i know from expierance but ive seen alot less r33 rb26's pop than the r32 rb26s thats for sure.. lol

Won't get dragged off-topic from now on sorry :(

Edited by jazza08
sewid Grand Master

sewid

Posted
Posted
Like? I mean 5-10-15k more and u get a newer engine.. paint will be new on any r32 i buy and most of the ground components will still be holding up fine, right. Also R32 GTR 92 and a R33GTR 93 will probably show the same signs of wear across the grid right?

Considering they didn't begin producing the R33 GTR until 1995 i'd say an 1993 R33 GTR would have quite a few things wrong with it......... maybe a little creative badge engineering from a GTS-t owner..

sewid Grand Master

sewid

Posted
Posted
Someone went off-topic on the GTR onto the GTST's.

So i was refering to the rb20 vs rb25 in which i dont believe an rb25 is any stronger from owning both an rb20, rb25 and neo rb25.

In regards to the GTR i can't say i know from expierance but ive seen alot less r33 rb26's pop than the r32 rb26s thats for sure.. lol

Won't get dragged off-topic from now on sorry :(

Sorry missed where it went off in that tangent! :sorcerer:

ali-turko Grand Master

ali-turko

Posted
Posted

buddy go for an r32 gtr, just sitting in the drivers seat makes it fill like a race car, they have that real sporty fill to them, but they are getting old,

and im guna buy another one in a couple months time, but i wanna spend close to 30k on a nice clean one.

search and you will find prestine condition one

DECIM8 Grand Master

DECIM8

Posted
Posted

dunno if I commented before however..

32GTR same power output as a 34 GTT .. Obvious gain is 4wd..

Downside is u need a deep pocket.. it always breaks down 32 that is and will need constant attention..

So really its for a real entusiast and id really only buy one to race or to mod of its tits .. like my mates.. but even as is .. he blows engines all the time .. except his running Rb30 bottom so spose it wont apply..

33's are ugly .. my view of them anyways and there enough on the rd to give commonwhores a run for there money..

34s hot .. abit short in the ass .. great handling in stock form.. alot are un modded and produce nice figures .. sure fork out an extra 40g and get yourself a GTR 34 .. Now ive got the gtt Im actually concidering it .. Although petrol would suk!

Beer Baron Grand Master

Beer Baron

Posted
Posted

it's a tough choice but with your $30K budget for a 32 GTR you will be able to pick from the cream of the crop. and in my eyes the $30K 32 GTR is the winner here over the $35K 33 GTR and the GTT.

I currently have both parked in the garage and yes they are different cars, in different states of tune, and the 33 does have some positives, but I love the look and feel of the 32.

so which do you prefer?

This:

picture105nd7.jpg

or this:

picture037aa4.jpg

R34NRG Grand Master

R34NRG

Posted
Posted

i was in the same pickle as you my friend but i choosed the path of the r34 gtt, kinda regret ever getting a skyline cuz they are seriously everywhere (not so bad the 34s but i see em everywhere now adays) 32 GTR was the obvious for speed and power but the things are just to old, and the 33.....well lets just say ive seen so many R33 GTSTs that i got so sick of the 33 i didnt even bother, so thats how i decided on the 34....lol

lingeringsoul Grand Master

lingeringsoul

Posted
Posted
it's a tough choice but with your $30K budget for a 32 GTR you will be able to pick from the cream of the crop. and in my eyes the $30K 32 GTR is the winner here over the $35K 33 GTR and the GTT.

I currently have both parked in the garage and yes they are different cars, in different states of tune, and the 33 does have some positives, but I love the look and feel of the 32.

so which do you prefer?

This:

picture105nd7.jpg

or this:

picture037aa4.jpg

holy shit....u bought a 33GTR???? that is one pretty 33

GTAAAH Mentor

GTAAAH

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Considering they didn't begin producing the R33 GTR until 1995 i'd say an 1993 R33 GTR would have quite a few things wrong with it......... maybe a little creative badge engineering from a GTS-t owner..

Oh, i assumed that gtr's came out same year as the gts-t's so there are 94 32 GTR's?

That 32 above is nicee, looking at the 32 it's a better looking car that i see alot less often to..

Now i've decided 33 isn't the route to go for me (as looks just dont do anything for me)

So now it's just a toss up between a 34 GTT (with idk, a new engine or something, rb25/30 perhaps) or a 32 GTR

jazza08 Mentor

jazza08

Posted
Posted

Then do a search, coz there's a thread on that exact comparison!

32R vs 34 gt-t, think the 34 had more votes but it was very close, you decide if you want down right performance with the R32 or abit more luxury and comfort with decent performance on the side bein the R34!

GTAAAH Mentor

GTAAAH

Posted
  • Author
Posted

true, i forgot about that thread, i'll have a look. I'm trying to factor in a engine transplant for the 34 into the equation and end up with a reasonable price and compare cost to the 32 as well, very difficult for me because i'm semi-retarded

frankxinyu Mentor

frankxinyu

Posted
Posted
Considering they didn't begin producing the R33 GTR until 1995 i'd say an 1993 R33 GTR would have quite a few things wrong with it......... maybe a little creative badge engineering from a GTS-t owner..

lol...

there are so much technical infomation in this thread...

jazza08 Mentor

jazza08

Posted
Posted

If your not happy with 300-400ish rwhp don't bother with a gt-t. Engine transplant is too much hassel unless your chasin 400+rwhp.

If you want more than that go a GTR simply for the grip point of view with fat tyres all round and awd you'll actually get some traction!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • hypergear
      Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread

      By hypergear · Posted

      Updating results following our SR20det project. Data collected form improves future turbocharger making and high flowing services. So far differences between G and GT series turbine wheels, we are in the process of making a new turbine, the aim is for better mid top range flow without gain too much lag.  Result is back to back comparison of G25-660 and GTX2867 spec turbochargers on the same car, nothing changed apart from turbocharger. Both tuned to knock limit from pump 98 fuel (US Ron93). GTX2867 was about 400RPM more responsive making 255rwkws while G25-660 made 17 extra Kws with wider spread of torque after 4500RPM finishing off at 272rwkws.  
    • romel
      Swapped rb25de neo how to get the gear indication on the dash to work

      By romel · Posted

      @GTSBoy i tried to jumper the wires and got the steering wheel light to come on which is right under the gear indication but that still doesnt come on.  Can it be an issue with my cluster?
    • GTSBoy
      Swapped rb25de neo how to get the gear indication on the dash to work

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Given that you have seen the dash indicator work briefly, then it would seem like you have a simple wiring problem. What happens when you simply jumper the wires on the "steering wheel switch"?
    • MBS206
      The Ls1 R33 Of Fury

      By MBS206 · Posted

      Yesterday's day in review: All the wiring to the lights up the front how I want it, is ran, terminated, and all to length. The only lighting up front I haven't finished is the side indicators, as I need to get to the partly cutup factory loom, and find the plugs for them. Interesting note, the side indicators use the exact same plug that's in the doors for something else that I don't remember what it is... So that plug better be careful...   Power steering solenoid, on the R33 is variable, and from memory PWM. The Ford's control from the docs I have so far, is it's just a on or off control. So I'm not sure it's what I want, and in any case, power steering running, but at its heaviest (solenoid off) is likely what I'll want anyway, so I'm not yet touching it at all. All the wiring I can complete so far, is done. There are 3 wires I need to make a plug for at the ECU, and these are just for the vehicle speed sensor, of which I need to get a T5 from an AU, so I can use its output that has the speed sensor on it. (My car doesn't have ABS, otherwise I'd set it up to use one of the ring gears on that). I need to buy new headlight globes and front parker globes, otherwise I could show photos of lights working. Current fuel lines in and out on this motor are "5/16". I'll order hardline, and some AN fittings for that, and I just need to 100% check fuel line size at the tank end, to get the ends for it. I'm also looking at a few options for the banjo bolts to AN fittings for the power steering rack. I'll pull the reservoir off the Barras PS pump. There's an off the shelf fitting for that pump for a -10 AN feed, and it'll use a 16mm to dash -6 an outlet to feed the rack. I'll be making my own power steering reservoir, I'm going through the thought process at the moment of how I'll run the baffles, and I need to research another idea for it too.
    • MBS206
      Coc or nox of nissan skyline

      By MBS206 · Posted

      Two inlet runners changes the engines characteristics requiring less fuel to make torque at different points in the rev range. The smaller diameter inlet runners on the DET increases air flow speed, which improves atomisation of fuel, particularly in low load/idle for better burn, and in specific areas of the engine, (areas you would use when driving normally) increases the efficiency. All of those items change how efficient the engine is at different speeds. The changes on the neo help slightly to improve emissions where it matters. The overall improvements won't be the likes of going from an engine built in the 70s to an engine built in the 2000s, it's just a small step. But still leaves it the RB with the best chance of improvement.   As for your comment about the whole using a cat to not need to worry about those gases. Two things, no system is 100% perfect. It won't eliminate everything. So reduce the quantity you put into it, you still reduce the output. Two, make that system do less work, and it's likely to survive a little bit longer. Funnily enough to, one trick employed to get cats up to temp, AND to drastically reduce emissions before they get up to temp, is to reduce ignition timing.
×
×
  • Create New...