Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Agreed with above comments on 34 interior.

R33s dont have a stronger motor, more powerful yes. I dont think there's much in the interior's, the 33 is too spacey for my liking but yes its a good point its a newer car thus will always have less problems unless the r32 has been built (not just the motor).

Yes the R33 does have a stronger motor over say an early R32. For a start the need to fix the crank collar issue is gone in the R33 and secondly it's a newer motor.

In my opinion the R33 GTR is a superior car in terms of everything than the R32 and R34 GT-t except maybe personal preference for looks. I personally think a clean series 3 R33 GTR is a far better car in every respect to an R32 or R34 GT-t but that is personal taste.

Yes the R33 does have a stronger motor over say an early R32. For a start the need to fix the crank collar issue is gone in the R33 and secondly it's a newer motor.

Someone went off-topic on the GTR onto the GTST's.

So i was refering to the rb20 vs rb25 in which i dont believe an rb25 is any stronger from owning both an rb20, rb25 and neo rb25.

In regards to the GTR i can't say i know from expierance but ive seen alot less r33 rb26's pop than the r32 rb26s thats for sure.. lol

Won't get dragged off-topic from now on sorry :(

Edited by jazza08
Like? I mean 5-10-15k more and u get a newer engine.. paint will be new on any r32 i buy and most of the ground components will still be holding up fine, right. Also R32 GTR 92 and a R33GTR 93 will probably show the same signs of wear across the grid right?

Considering they didn't begin producing the R33 GTR until 1995 i'd say an 1993 R33 GTR would have quite a few things wrong with it......... maybe a little creative badge engineering from a GTS-t owner..

Someone went off-topic on the GTR onto the GTST's.

So i was refering to the rb20 vs rb25 in which i dont believe an rb25 is any stronger from owning both an rb20, rb25 and neo rb25.

In regards to the GTR i can't say i know from expierance but ive seen alot less r33 rb26's pop than the r32 rb26s thats for sure.. lol

Won't get dragged off-topic from now on sorry :(

Sorry missed where it went off in that tangent! :sorcerer:

buddy go for an r32 gtr, just sitting in the drivers seat makes it fill like a race car, they have that real sporty fill to them, but they are getting old,

and im guna buy another one in a couple months time, but i wanna spend close to 30k on a nice clean one.

search and you will find prestine condition one

dunno if I commented before however..

32GTR same power output as a 34 GTT .. Obvious gain is 4wd..

Downside is u need a deep pocket.. it always breaks down 32 that is and will need constant attention..

So really its for a real entusiast and id really only buy one to race or to mod of its tits .. like my mates.. but even as is .. he blows engines all the time .. except his running Rb30 bottom so spose it wont apply..

33's are ugly .. my view of them anyways and there enough on the rd to give commonwhores a run for there money..

34s hot .. abit short in the ass .. great handling in stock form.. alot are un modded and produce nice figures .. sure fork out an extra 40g and get yourself a GTR 34 .. Now ive got the gtt Im actually concidering it .. Although petrol would suk!

it's a tough choice but with your $30K budget for a 32 GTR you will be able to pick from the cream of the crop. and in my eyes the $30K 32 GTR is the winner here over the $35K 33 GTR and the GTT.

I currently have both parked in the garage and yes they are different cars, in different states of tune, and the 33 does have some positives, but I love the look and feel of the 32.

so which do you prefer?

This:

picture105nd7.jpg

or this:

picture037aa4.jpg

i was in the same pickle as you my friend but i choosed the path of the r34 gtt, kinda regret ever getting a skyline cuz they are seriously everywhere (not so bad the 34s but i see em everywhere now adays) 32 GTR was the obvious for speed and power but the things are just to old, and the 33.....well lets just say ive seen so many R33 GTSTs that i got so sick of the 33 i didnt even bother, so thats how i decided on the 34....lol

it's a tough choice but with your $30K budget for a 32 GTR you will be able to pick from the cream of the crop. and in my eyes the $30K 32 GTR is the winner here over the $35K 33 GTR and the GTT.

I currently have both parked in the garage and yes they are different cars, in different states of tune, and the 33 does have some positives, but I love the look and feel of the 32.

so which do you prefer?

This:

picture105nd7.jpg

or this:

picture037aa4.jpg

holy shit....u bought a 33GTR???? that is one pretty 33

Considering they didn't begin producing the R33 GTR until 1995 i'd say an 1993 R33 GTR would have quite a few things wrong with it......... maybe a little creative badge engineering from a GTS-t owner..

Oh, i assumed that gtr's came out same year as the gts-t's so there are 94 32 GTR's?

That 32 above is nicee, looking at the 32 it's a better looking car that i see alot less often to..

Now i've decided 33 isn't the route to go for me (as looks just dont do anything for me)

So now it's just a toss up between a 34 GTT (with idk, a new engine or something, rb25/30 perhaps) or a 32 GTR

Then do a search, coz there's a thread on that exact comparison!

32R vs 34 gt-t, think the 34 had more votes but it was very close, you decide if you want down right performance with the R32 or abit more luxury and comfort with decent performance on the side bein the R34!

true, i forgot about that thread, i'll have a look. I'm trying to factor in a engine transplant for the 34 into the equation and end up with a reasonable price and compare cost to the 32 as well, very difficult for me because i'm semi-retarded

Considering they didn't begin producing the R33 GTR until 1995 i'd say an 1993 R33 GTR would have quite a few things wrong with it......... maybe a little creative badge engineering from a GTS-t owner..

lol...

there are so much technical infomation in this thread...

If your not happy with 300-400ish rwhp don't bother with a gt-t. Engine transplant is too much hassel unless your chasin 400+rwhp.

If you want more than that go a GTR simply for the grip point of view with fat tyres all round and awd you'll actually get some traction!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I’d love to find some where that can recover the dashes to look brand new and original. Mine has a very slight bubble, nothing compared to some I’ve seen though 
    • $170K. I asked one of the guys there as a joke if that price was just for the passenger seat as it was where the price sheet was... he tried really hard to crack a smile 😄 He also mentioned that every single part of the car was inspected and either restored or replaced with a new or as new part, or made from scratch. The interior was incredible, every inch like a new car.
    • Time for a modernisation, throw out the AFM, stock O2s, ECU into the e-waste bin. Rip out the cable throttle, IACV, pedal, etc. into the scrap metal bin. DBW, e-throttle, modern ECU, CANbus wideband, and the thing will drive better than when it left the factory.
    • I agree, don't go trusting those trims. As I said, first step is to put the logger away, and do the basics in diagnosis.   I spend plenty of time with data loggers. I also spend plenty of time teaching "technicians" why they need to stop using their data loggers, and learn real diagnostics.   The amount of data logs I play with would probably blow most people away. I don't just use it to diagnose. I log raw CAN data too, as a nice chunk of my job is reverse engineering what automotive manufacturers are doing.
    • I'm aware, but unless you're actually seeing the voltage the ECU is seeing and you're able to verify the sensors are actually working I find it hard to just trust STFT/LTFT. I will say, logging the ECU comes naturally to me because it's one of the lowest effort methods of diagnosis and I do similar things in my day job all the time. Staring at 20+ charts looking for something that isn't quite right isn't for everyone. NDS1 allows you to log almost everything so that's normally what I do and then sort out the data later. 
×
×
  • Create New...