Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Agreed with above comments on 34 interior.

R33s dont have a stronger motor, more powerful yes. I dont think there's much in the interior's, the 33 is too spacey for my liking but yes its a good point its a newer car thus will always have less problems unless the r32 has been built (not just the motor).

Yes the R33 does have a stronger motor over say an early R32. For a start the need to fix the crank collar issue is gone in the R33 and secondly it's a newer motor.

In my opinion the R33 GTR is a superior car in terms of everything than the R32 and R34 GT-t except maybe personal preference for looks. I personally think a clean series 3 R33 GTR is a far better car in every respect to an R32 or R34 GT-t but that is personal taste.

Yes the R33 does have a stronger motor over say an early R32. For a start the need to fix the crank collar issue is gone in the R33 and secondly it's a newer motor.

Someone went off-topic on the GTR onto the GTST's.

So i was refering to the rb20 vs rb25 in which i dont believe an rb25 is any stronger from owning both an rb20, rb25 and neo rb25.

In regards to the GTR i can't say i know from expierance but ive seen alot less r33 rb26's pop than the r32 rb26s thats for sure.. lol

Won't get dragged off-topic from now on sorry :(

Edited by jazza08
Like? I mean 5-10-15k more and u get a newer engine.. paint will be new on any r32 i buy and most of the ground components will still be holding up fine, right. Also R32 GTR 92 and a R33GTR 93 will probably show the same signs of wear across the grid right?

Considering they didn't begin producing the R33 GTR until 1995 i'd say an 1993 R33 GTR would have quite a few things wrong with it......... maybe a little creative badge engineering from a GTS-t owner..

Someone went off-topic on the GTR onto the GTST's.

So i was refering to the rb20 vs rb25 in which i dont believe an rb25 is any stronger from owning both an rb20, rb25 and neo rb25.

In regards to the GTR i can't say i know from expierance but ive seen alot less r33 rb26's pop than the r32 rb26s thats for sure.. lol

Won't get dragged off-topic from now on sorry :(

Sorry missed where it went off in that tangent! :sorcerer:

buddy go for an r32 gtr, just sitting in the drivers seat makes it fill like a race car, they have that real sporty fill to them, but they are getting old,

and im guna buy another one in a couple months time, but i wanna spend close to 30k on a nice clean one.

search and you will find prestine condition one

dunno if I commented before however..

32GTR same power output as a 34 GTT .. Obvious gain is 4wd..

Downside is u need a deep pocket.. it always breaks down 32 that is and will need constant attention..

So really its for a real entusiast and id really only buy one to race or to mod of its tits .. like my mates.. but even as is .. he blows engines all the time .. except his running Rb30 bottom so spose it wont apply..

33's are ugly .. my view of them anyways and there enough on the rd to give commonwhores a run for there money..

34s hot .. abit short in the ass .. great handling in stock form.. alot are un modded and produce nice figures .. sure fork out an extra 40g and get yourself a GTR 34 .. Now ive got the gtt Im actually concidering it .. Although petrol would suk!

it's a tough choice but with your $30K budget for a 32 GTR you will be able to pick from the cream of the crop. and in my eyes the $30K 32 GTR is the winner here over the $35K 33 GTR and the GTT.

I currently have both parked in the garage and yes they are different cars, in different states of tune, and the 33 does have some positives, but I love the look and feel of the 32.

so which do you prefer?

This:

picture105nd7.jpg

or this:

picture037aa4.jpg

i was in the same pickle as you my friend but i choosed the path of the r34 gtt, kinda regret ever getting a skyline cuz they are seriously everywhere (not so bad the 34s but i see em everywhere now adays) 32 GTR was the obvious for speed and power but the things are just to old, and the 33.....well lets just say ive seen so many R33 GTSTs that i got so sick of the 33 i didnt even bother, so thats how i decided on the 34....lol

it's a tough choice but with your $30K budget for a 32 GTR you will be able to pick from the cream of the crop. and in my eyes the $30K 32 GTR is the winner here over the $35K 33 GTR and the GTT.

I currently have both parked in the garage and yes they are different cars, in different states of tune, and the 33 does have some positives, but I love the look and feel of the 32.

so which do you prefer?

This:

picture105nd7.jpg

or this:

picture037aa4.jpg

holy shit....u bought a 33GTR???? that is one pretty 33

Considering they didn't begin producing the R33 GTR until 1995 i'd say an 1993 R33 GTR would have quite a few things wrong with it......... maybe a little creative badge engineering from a GTS-t owner..

Oh, i assumed that gtr's came out same year as the gts-t's so there are 94 32 GTR's?

That 32 above is nicee, looking at the 32 it's a better looking car that i see alot less often to..

Now i've decided 33 isn't the route to go for me (as looks just dont do anything for me)

So now it's just a toss up between a 34 GTT (with idk, a new engine or something, rb25/30 perhaps) or a 32 GTR

Then do a search, coz there's a thread on that exact comparison!

32R vs 34 gt-t, think the 34 had more votes but it was very close, you decide if you want down right performance with the R32 or abit more luxury and comfort with decent performance on the side bein the R34!

true, i forgot about that thread, i'll have a look. I'm trying to factor in a engine transplant for the 34 into the equation and end up with a reasonable price and compare cost to the 32 as well, very difficult for me because i'm semi-retarded

Considering they didn't begin producing the R33 GTR until 1995 i'd say an 1993 R33 GTR would have quite a few things wrong with it......... maybe a little creative badge engineering from a GTS-t owner..

lol...

there are so much technical infomation in this thread...

If your not happy with 300-400ish rwhp don't bother with a gt-t. Engine transplant is too much hassel unless your chasin 400+rwhp.

If you want more than that go a GTR simply for the grip point of view with fat tyres all round and awd you'll actually get some traction!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got started on the modification to make these splash plates fit over the long weekend. First the surprisingly time consuming task of swapping all the cam camp bolts to Tomei cam cap studs. I did the method of removing one bolt at a time, applying loctite to the stud, double nutting to torque as the manual described. Then carefully unlocking the nuts without disrupting the torque of the stud (and going back to re-torque a few times when it slipped). Finally applying the nut and torquing to spec. Repeat x28 Next up I went about removing the stock cam cover baffle so I could ensure it was fully clean after drilling for stud clearance.  As the blind rivets holding the baffle on were domed I used a punch to mark the center then used 4mm drill bit to carefully drill out the rivet without going too far part the baffle. As seen in other thread here is what is inside the stock baffles I decided on M4x6mm bolts to bolt the baffle plate back on with. I used a 3.3mm drill bit with some tape to mark the depth at ~8mm. Next was to tap the threads using a cheap bunnings kit M4x0.7. With the baffle removed I also drilled out the spot welds holding in the baffle plate oil returns. Unsure whether this was the best option or if I should have cut holes in the Hypertune splash plates to allow the oil drains to still function... time will tell. I then removed the the Hypertune splash plates so I could rest the cam cover on top and use a dab of grease to mark where the studs impacted the oem cam cover baffle. The most obvious spot was on the hump from the stock mesh is held. Using this hole as an anchor I bolted the oem baffle plate back into the cam cover and lined up the Hypertune splash plate. Marked the rest of the holes for the studs and drill those out too. Total 32 holes drilled and 12 threads tapped on the passenger side cam cover alone for this bolt on part that totally clears all OEM cam covers.. Drivers side next as well as some E85 safe fuel foam to fill the space behind the behind cam cover baffle plates. oh and some lock nuts for the splash plates of course.
    • I had the same previously, and it really shits me. They just run off red book averages or whatever as the maximum insured, there are never good quality cars available to buy for anywhere near those prices. I don't even understand why they do it. Sure having a customer overinsure then false claim is a risk, but how often does that really happen in the world, 1%? 0.1%? On the other hand, all 10-20% above redbook listed prices and charge 10-20% higher premium, surely that is more profitable for those cockroaches
    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
×
×
  • Create New...