Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well i decided to pull my ACC valve off last night, basically because of the ongoing cold start issues.

The reason i did was that eaven if i wound the screw all the way in on the ACC valve, i couldn't get a lower RPM then say 600.

SO cleaned it up, pluged it up and all good workes well, the valve was clean, but i still can only get to 600 rpm.

NO i don't want it to idle at 600 rpm, it was just an observation.

I have set the idle as per procedure and seams to hold ok, but if i pull the ACC valve plug off the car will die, i suspect that this is correct?

I have tested the ACC valve with the multimeter and the computer and all work OK, as per spec.

Is there any way that one can test if the ACC valve operation is abnormal.

ALSO found that my Cold start valve is a bit stuffed, if you put it in the fridge it only opens half way, so it is never fully open when cold. I kinda bodged it up to do so, and it work a bit better, but need a new one.

Any idea on cost????????

The car still starts like a dog, leaning more to fuel injectors. I am going to deperesurise the system, and then push compressed air through the system to remove all fuel and see how we go.

Spoke to kutsie and he recond it has to be the fuel injectors.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162305-acc-valve-operations/
Share on other sites

well what i have doen since, is to remove all fuel from the fuel rail, by turning the pump off and pressurising it wil air, runnign teh engien untill all fuel was out of the system. There was nooo fuel at all, not a drop.

This morning i connected it all up, including datalogit, and started the car, still went like a dog, the data didn't swop up anything funny, except at cranking the voltage droped to below 8V so not sure if that is BAD????? this happens for propably 400rpm till the voltage pics up, could this be it, couls this couse my cold starting problems.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...