Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i am just curious cause im super happy with the result....had a great day....look forward to the next meet up....

yeh you b*tch be happy, some of us have to spend thousands and still arn't at that reading yet :D . . . :teehee:

  • Replies 368
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i spent nearly $2300 on it so far....still plenty to come....

im not bitchin guys....just happy with the result...

Wow thats not bad Brendan for that much! I'm sure most of us have spend 6000+ to get only little gain out of the engine..

Abo Bob,

Sorry to post this here but my internet explorer won't let me PM you.

My engine came out of a dressed half cut which still had factory computer, AMF's, air box, intercooler, dump pipes, front pipes, cam gears and the factory filter and when i fitted this engine and got the PFC fitted with z32 amfs and tuned and it made 248 awkws on CRDs dyno at 18 psi 2 1/2 years ago sence then all i've done is fit HKS EVC, twin plate, Metal cat and apex'i power intake kit.

So naturaly i have no reason to believe the turbos had been changed, at the time of fitting the engine i fitted ces dump pipes and equal length front pipes and while doing this i checked the housing size of the exhaurst housing which is where i got the .48 from.

Every day driving i have it on 15 psi and drags on 19 psi same as the dyno, track on 15 psi. I've spent the last few years developing the car to get as much as i possibley can out of the stock turbos before i put something bigger in when i rebuild the first engine which spun No 6 big end.

As below the car ran 11.36 @ 125 mph on 19 psi.

Please don't get me wrong im not trying to be smart im just trying to prove a point, by all means if some one can tell me how to tell if they are not other then the stocks just can't do that then im all ears.

Edited by XKLABA
I'm pretty sure getting 350rwkW to the ground is pretty much impossible. You'll feel more G's in a 300awkW GTR. :)

You'll also beat more ppl from a standing start too.

Getting the power to the ground is not that hard to be honest. A well sorted wheel/tyre/suspension setup lets us put down 410rwkw in 3rd gear and upwards. 1st and 2nd is of course a total and utter waste of time, but its loads of fun in 3rd gear :D :D

Looked like a massive day for UAS and SAU which i would expect nothing else. Great to see so many cars but a huge shame our car hasnt been sorted as it would have been great to get it on the rollers :) maybe next year!!!

well i was completely pleased with my result....didnt think i would take the 33 stock turbo category with so small mods. didnt hang around so i missed the prizes...

mods to date

Split dump, 3" system, hi flow cat

Just jap fmic

greddy profec B at 12psi(drops to 10psi)

Made 202.6rwkw.

Damn it! :D thought i might have had a chance this time, LOL

Thats great power, as abo bob said, prob chipped! i have a fair bit more done than listed above including power fc which was only tuned last week on 11psi and i got 205KW, only got 195KW on sat.

Abo Bob

Pop ups thing didn't work still won't let me PM it just shuts down internet explorer, i can't ADDREPLY either only FASTREPLY.

Like i said not trying to be smart or accuse anyone of anything, i think i've had an honest shot at it with what i can only asume are the stock turbos and i thought i was doing good with then not breaking, i thought they were still going because im fairly carefull with how i use them and only turning them up for short periods soes not to over heat them which is what i thought was what makes them fail.

Just can't understand why some one in japan would spend the money on high flowing or converting them to steel and not fitting an exhaurst, filters, computer or boost controler.

As i said before when they were apart i looked to see if they had .64 rear housings and when i saw they were .48 i just thought stockers and didn't look further.

Still i have to think they are stock, i certainly have not touched them other then put dumps on and will be rather disapointed if in fact they do turn out to be something else as i am rather proud of my efferts so far bring it from 13 flat with only cat back to what it does now. :D

Abo Bob,

Sorry to post this here but my internet explorer won't let me PM you.

My engine came out of a dressed half cut which still had factory computer, AMF's, air box, intercooler, dump pipes, front pipes, cam gears and the factory filter and when i fitted this engine and got the PFC fitted with z32 amfs and tuned and it made 248 awkws on CRDs dyno at 18 psi 2 1/2 years ago sence then all i've done is fit HKS EVC, twin plate, Metal cat and apex'i power intake kit.

So naturaly i have no reason to believe the turbos had been changed, at the time of fitting the engine i fitted ces dump pipes and equal length front pipes and while doing this i checked the housing size of the exhaurst housing which is where i got the .48 from.

Every day driving i have it on 15 psi and drags on 19 psi same as the dyno, track on 15 psi. I've spent the last few years developing the car to get as much as i possibley can out of the stock turbos before i put something bigger in when i rebuild the first engine which spun No 6 big end.

As below the car ran 11.36 @ 125 mph on 19 psi.

Please don't get me wrong im not trying to be smart im just trying to prove a point, by all means if some one can tell me how to tell if they are not other then the stocks just can't do that then im all ears.

Im trying to get my head around the 11.3 @ 126 mph on stock turbos part.

Im trying to get my head around the 11.3 @ 126 mph on stock turbos part.

I agree, Nick.

I do recall years ago at the old Eastern Creek drags there was a guy who had a burgundy (Aus-spec?) GTR who ran 11.4's. He claimed that they were with stock turbos. I didn't believe him. Up until now, I don't think anyone else has claimed anything close to that on stockers. I would suggest that they would probably be highflowed turbos as standard GTR turbos just do not make 290rwkw.

Edited by NXTIME
i fail to see how 290rwkw would or could run 125mph.... we ran 124 with 340rwkw and N1's. Not saying it hasnt happened on paper, just think something isnt really right there.....

I think it comes down to different dyno readings. TO4GTR made 295rwkw on the same dyno that day and he has run an 11.3@122.

yeah i know i couldn't believe the time either i thought it had to be a mistake but i have 1, 11.49 @ 119 mph slip, 1, 11.36 @ 125 mph slip, and 1, 11.38 @ 125 mph slip which was done on the 16th of this month last wednesday night and the dyno run of 290rwkw which was done on the 19th of this month at the sau dyno day.

sorry no nos and only shell v-power

Edited by XKLABA
yeah i know i couldn't believe the time either i thought it had to be a mistake but i have 1, 11.49 @ 119 mph slip, 1, 11.36 @ 125 mph slip, and 1, 11.38 @ 125 mph slip which was done on the 16th of this month last wednesday night and the dyno run of 290rwkw which was done on the 19th of this month at the sau dyno day.

sorry no nos and only shell v-power

Dude, can I just say here that you are taking this in the nicest possible way and that is quite refreshing.

yeah i know i couldn't believe the time either i thought it had to be a mistake but i have 1, 11.49 @ 119 mph slip, 1, 11.36 @ 125 mph slip, and 1, 11.38 @ 125 mph slip which was done on the 16th of this month last wednesday night and the dyno run of 290rwkw which was done on the 19th of this month at the sau dyno day.

sorry no nos and only shell v-power

Hey mate 290rwkws thats nice, i made 252 on 11psi so if the turbos hold together car see why they wouldnt make 290rwkws. Anyway looks like i missed a good day

I think it comes down to different dyno readings. TO4GTR made 295rwkw on the same dyno that day and he has run an 11.3@122.

yes. power isnt really that importand. infacgt its refreshing seeing that and running the numbers :)




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...