Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i am just curious cause im super happy with the result....had a great day....look forward to the next meet up....

yeh you b*tch be happy, some of us have to spend thousands and still arn't at that reading yet :D . . . :teehee:

  • Replies 368
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i spent nearly $2300 on it so far....still plenty to come....

im not bitchin guys....just happy with the result...

Wow thats not bad Brendan for that much! I'm sure most of us have spend 6000+ to get only little gain out of the engine..

Abo Bob,

Sorry to post this here but my internet explorer won't let me PM you.

My engine came out of a dressed half cut which still had factory computer, AMF's, air box, intercooler, dump pipes, front pipes, cam gears and the factory filter and when i fitted this engine and got the PFC fitted with z32 amfs and tuned and it made 248 awkws on CRDs dyno at 18 psi 2 1/2 years ago sence then all i've done is fit HKS EVC, twin plate, Metal cat and apex'i power intake kit.

So naturaly i have no reason to believe the turbos had been changed, at the time of fitting the engine i fitted ces dump pipes and equal length front pipes and while doing this i checked the housing size of the exhaurst housing which is where i got the .48 from.

Every day driving i have it on 15 psi and drags on 19 psi same as the dyno, track on 15 psi. I've spent the last few years developing the car to get as much as i possibley can out of the stock turbos before i put something bigger in when i rebuild the first engine which spun No 6 big end.

As below the car ran 11.36 @ 125 mph on 19 psi.

Please don't get me wrong im not trying to be smart im just trying to prove a point, by all means if some one can tell me how to tell if they are not other then the stocks just can't do that then im all ears.

Edited by XKLABA
I'm pretty sure getting 350rwkW to the ground is pretty much impossible. You'll feel more G's in a 300awkW GTR. :)

You'll also beat more ppl from a standing start too.

Getting the power to the ground is not that hard to be honest. A well sorted wheel/tyre/suspension setup lets us put down 410rwkw in 3rd gear and upwards. 1st and 2nd is of course a total and utter waste of time, but its loads of fun in 3rd gear :D :D

Looked like a massive day for UAS and SAU which i would expect nothing else. Great to see so many cars but a huge shame our car hasnt been sorted as it would have been great to get it on the rollers :) maybe next year!!!

well i was completely pleased with my result....didnt think i would take the 33 stock turbo category with so small mods. didnt hang around so i missed the prizes...

mods to date

Split dump, 3" system, hi flow cat

Just jap fmic

greddy profec B at 12psi(drops to 10psi)

Made 202.6rwkw.

Damn it! :D thought i might have had a chance this time, LOL

Thats great power, as abo bob said, prob chipped! i have a fair bit more done than listed above including power fc which was only tuned last week on 11psi and i got 205KW, only got 195KW on sat.

Abo Bob

Pop ups thing didn't work still won't let me PM it just shuts down internet explorer, i can't ADDREPLY either only FASTREPLY.

Like i said not trying to be smart or accuse anyone of anything, i think i've had an honest shot at it with what i can only asume are the stock turbos and i thought i was doing good with then not breaking, i thought they were still going because im fairly carefull with how i use them and only turning them up for short periods soes not to over heat them which is what i thought was what makes them fail.

Just can't understand why some one in japan would spend the money on high flowing or converting them to steel and not fitting an exhaurst, filters, computer or boost controler.

As i said before when they were apart i looked to see if they had .64 rear housings and when i saw they were .48 i just thought stockers and didn't look further.

Still i have to think they are stock, i certainly have not touched them other then put dumps on and will be rather disapointed if in fact they do turn out to be something else as i am rather proud of my efferts so far bring it from 13 flat with only cat back to what it does now. :D

Abo Bob,

Sorry to post this here but my internet explorer won't let me PM you.

My engine came out of a dressed half cut which still had factory computer, AMF's, air box, intercooler, dump pipes, front pipes, cam gears and the factory filter and when i fitted this engine and got the PFC fitted with z32 amfs and tuned and it made 248 awkws on CRDs dyno at 18 psi 2 1/2 years ago sence then all i've done is fit HKS EVC, twin plate, Metal cat and apex'i power intake kit.

So naturaly i have no reason to believe the turbos had been changed, at the time of fitting the engine i fitted ces dump pipes and equal length front pipes and while doing this i checked the housing size of the exhaurst housing which is where i got the .48 from.

Every day driving i have it on 15 psi and drags on 19 psi same as the dyno, track on 15 psi. I've spent the last few years developing the car to get as much as i possibley can out of the stock turbos before i put something bigger in when i rebuild the first engine which spun No 6 big end.

As below the car ran 11.36 @ 125 mph on 19 psi.

Please don't get me wrong im not trying to be smart im just trying to prove a point, by all means if some one can tell me how to tell if they are not other then the stocks just can't do that then im all ears.

Im trying to get my head around the 11.3 @ 126 mph on stock turbos part.

Im trying to get my head around the 11.3 @ 126 mph on stock turbos part.

I agree, Nick.

I do recall years ago at the old Eastern Creek drags there was a guy who had a burgundy (Aus-spec?) GTR who ran 11.4's. He claimed that they were with stock turbos. I didn't believe him. Up until now, I don't think anyone else has claimed anything close to that on stockers. I would suggest that they would probably be highflowed turbos as standard GTR turbos just do not make 290rwkw.

Edited by NXTIME
i fail to see how 290rwkw would or could run 125mph.... we ran 124 with 340rwkw and N1's. Not saying it hasnt happened on paper, just think something isnt really right there.....

I think it comes down to different dyno readings. TO4GTR made 295rwkw on the same dyno that day and he has run an 11.3@122.

yeah i know i couldn't believe the time either i thought it had to be a mistake but i have 1, 11.49 @ 119 mph slip, 1, 11.36 @ 125 mph slip, and 1, 11.38 @ 125 mph slip which was done on the 16th of this month last wednesday night and the dyno run of 290rwkw which was done on the 19th of this month at the sau dyno day.

sorry no nos and only shell v-power

Edited by XKLABA
yeah i know i couldn't believe the time either i thought it had to be a mistake but i have 1, 11.49 @ 119 mph slip, 1, 11.36 @ 125 mph slip, and 1, 11.38 @ 125 mph slip which was done on the 16th of this month last wednesday night and the dyno run of 290rwkw which was done on the 19th of this month at the sau dyno day.

sorry no nos and only shell v-power

Dude, can I just say here that you are taking this in the nicest possible way and that is quite refreshing.

yeah i know i couldn't believe the time either i thought it had to be a mistake but i have 1, 11.49 @ 119 mph slip, 1, 11.36 @ 125 mph slip, and 1, 11.38 @ 125 mph slip which was done on the 16th of this month last wednesday night and the dyno run of 290rwkw which was done on the 19th of this month at the sau dyno day.

sorry no nos and only shell v-power

Hey mate 290rwkws thats nice, i made 252 on 11psi so if the turbos hold together car see why they wouldnt make 290rwkws. Anyway looks like i missed a good day

I think it comes down to different dyno readings. TO4GTR made 295rwkw on the same dyno that day and he has run an 11.3@122.

yes. power isnt really that importand. infacgt its refreshing seeing that and running the numbers :)




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pic of Nos, turbo kit and sequential not loading. 404 not found
    • im sure mine stays in gear and wont shift unless i shift it? and for sure it wont go back to Auto mode if its put in manual mode? if i use paddles but its still in D then of course it goes back to auto mode. but yer if its in -+ and i use paddles it will not auto change gears what so ever and i have tried this. it will gear down if at a stop though which is kinda nice but goes back to 1st gear not D. i think it used to be like this with imports aswell i dunno if its really like it anymore like when i got my R33 it had alot of JDM options which local cars didnt have. Now local cars have kinda caught up even the lower models. but yer transfer rates and other things makes it almost on par.
    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
×
×
  • Create New...