Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all here is a little scenario for you that i am currently in, last year my r34 gt put out 118 kW after putting on a stainless steel catback exhaust (it was doing 101 kW fully stock), at the time i was using bp ultimate in the car, not long after that i changed the fuel and started to use shell/coles v-power, both are premium unleaded, yesterday i got splitfire coilpack installed, before getting them put in though we did a power run to see what the car was putting out so i could then work how much kW she gained from them, low and behold the car was only doing 111 kW. i couldnt understand why it dropped 7kW in under 5 mths. anyways it has gained back that 7 kW through the spiltfire coilpacks. (when if the car was still running at 118 kW it should be sitting at 125 kW at the moment).

in the long run we came to the conclusion that because i had changed fuel companies from ultimate to v power this has had an effect on the power coming out of the car.

so has anyone else noticed a change in there power from changing fuel companies?

the thing to do now is: run down the tank of v-power currently in the car, fill up the bp ultimate end of next week, keep using ultimate for a few weeks then take the car back down to the dyno and see what happens!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162587-changing-fuel-companies/
Share on other sites

Alot of people say all this talk about different fuels producing different power is a bit of a myth.. I'm not entirely sure, but there is a big write up in HPI about the use of different fuels. Here's the main part of it..

The synopsis

Get a selection of high-octane pump fuels and tune the car to see which makes the best power.

Instead of simply adding a product and 'pulling' the Skyline (rb26) to see what power it makes this time we had to monitor the engine's knock level via the A'PEXi Power FC programmable management system, then optimise the tune to give the biggest result.

And the results are as follows..

BP ultimate: 223.5kW

Mobil Synergy: 220.3kW

Pump 95 Octane: 211.5kW

United Boost 98: 232.2kw ( 10% ethanol, but adds 3.5% oxygen as well as the promise of excellent knock resistance into the equation)

(sorry no v-power was tested :) )

The conclusion

If you want to spend the time and effort having your engine tuned to run on an ethanol-based fuel, then our testing shows that you will definately get a solid peformance result and benefit. However, bear in mind that with tuning and dyno time this whole process could cost you upwards of $500, which for some may be a small price to pay, and for others totally out of the ball park. You're also stuck with the situation of only being able to fill up at one chain of service stations, which is a serious limitation in the practicality of your car.

In this instance, the current 98-octane non-ethanol unleaded fuels still do an excellent joband make decent power. As our testing has shown, there doesn't seem to be a great deal of difference in having any particular brand loyalty, as both conventional 98 octane fuels performed in an extremely similar fashion. As for the 95 octane? The results speak for themselves.

(HPI Magazine)

So yea there are differences in which fuel you're using. Although they wouldn't be felt as much without a tune for a specific kind.

From my own experience.. Vortex makes my car fart like hell. Since then I've been switching between BP and v-Power. I've only used boost united once.. Although recently one opened up near me so I might start giving that a run a little more.

i think there are a few other factors (along with different fuels) you'll need to take into consideration cara.

- was it on the same dyno?

- were the dyno settings the same?

- were the intake and ambient temperatures the same/similar on both days?

i've had my car on the same dyno on the same day run back to back and can confidently say you will most likely always get a ~5kw variance each run.

yes fuel mixtures have some effect, and yes it's advised that if your car is tuned for a specific brand of fuel it's best to run that particular brand as much as possible. it is also not uncommon to have a bad batch of fuel, maybe the petrol station tanks were running low (sediments on the bottom? or whatever).

7kw is nothing to worry about, i bet the next time you run it'll be different again.

I'm a little sceptical of the 95ron result.

I've played around with different fuels (ulp, pulp, 98 and 98 eth). Mobil & BP 98 are on par, 98 eth there is a small increase in power but as for ulp and pulp. They both require much reduced ignition due to high knock levels.

I'm a little sceptical of the 95ron result.

I've played around with different fuels (ulp, pulp, 98 and 98 eth). Mobil & BP 98 are on par, 98 eth there is a small increase in power but as for ulp and pulp. They both require much reduced ignition due to high knock levels.

I too noticed that mobil and BP are about the same

its just gonna be one of thinks that i wont know until i get the fuel into the car and give it a couple of weeks and hopefully the car will get that 7 kW back. i wanna be able to show people that n/a cars can still get a decent amount a kW, in the sense of being n/a of course.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From the pictures I have when doing the job the flywheel is the same diameter, I don't think they're playing weird tricks like putting weights at the outer diameter to increase flywheel inertia or anything like that. The OEM flywheel is definitely heavier, but it's not a huge difference. Quoted weight savings of the clutch is 2 kg so I can't imagine the flywheel being lighter than ~7 kg. Kind of regret not weighing it before the clutch went into the car but as far as driveability goes I have no complaints.
    • HKS trigger kit should be very easy to integrate with a Link. It's a 36-2 crank trigger. Hard part is finding the motivation to take off the timing belt and everything on the front of the engine to install it. You also need to cut out a hole in the oil pump housing so the sensor can read the trigger wheel. Changing out the cam sensor for a 24 tooth setup is probably good enough but as others have mentioned depending on what underlying assumptions are changed it becomes more of a problem. Reading the crank state off of the cam is an abstraction that works in the general case, but if you have an edge case it makes less and less sense. There is a GTX2860 gen 2 that can take a compact 5 bolt housing so it's direct bolt on but I'm not 100% sure of what's involved. Peak compressor efficiency drops off a bit on these turbos vs -5s, 77% vs 73% but you get way, way wider region of operation. The -5s have a really strange surge line in their compressor map that is all over the place. If you think the hot side on the -5s aren't open enough you can try the Tomei T550B turbos which a local tuner seems to be happy with:
    • i need a complete tail light for my R33 GTR if you have please let me know.
    • I need a great maintenance workshop around Idaho, if you know one please let me know..
    • Hello friends, i have a good friend in Canada that looking for a good condition 1993 GTR around him please if one or know someone around you that is willing to let it go please let me know so that i can inform him.....Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...