Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I put my new turbo on about a year ago, but was talking to a mechanic the other day. He installs turbos on trucks, and made a point about priming the oil lines before the engine is started for the first time. This is so the turbo isnt without oil for the first few seconds.

Does this apply to our Skylines too?

Should we prime the main oil line when doing a turbo change?

I've read a few tutorials on here, but never heard anything mentioned about priming.

Do you know why the tutorials don't say to do it? I've found that whenever I read the tutorials, they are only a starting point. I can always improve them in many ways.

e.g. for the rb25/20, I never lever the turbo off the manifold to undo the 24mm banjo bolt behind it, because it bends the line. I remove the oil line from underneath (1 bolt), then the water banjo has clear access without bending stuff.

The people who wrote the tutorials may not be perfectionists like I am.

I would prime it. But on the other hand, if I was to do it aussie style in a she'll be right fashion, I'd just fang the turbo in, start it, and fang it.

Edited by MANWHORE
e.g. for the rb25/20, I never lever the turbo off the manifold to undo the 24mm banjo bolt behind it, because it bends the line. I remove the oil line from underneath (1 bolt), then the water banjo has clear access without bending stuff.

A bit off topic but I always remove the oil feed, the outer water banjo then get under the car and remove the oil drain and inside banjo, I crack it with a couple of spanners and then usea ratchet ringy to remove it. :)

Its usually recommended to connect everything up, leave the oil drain disconnected and spin the car over (not starting) and wait until you see oil coming out of the turbo's oil drain.

Its usually recommended to connect everything up, leave the oil drain disconnected and spin the car over (not starting) and wait until you see oil coming out of the turbo's oil drain.

Is this for peace of mind, so you know the turbos getting a good supply of oil?

lol... probably piece of mind.

I've never bothered looking etc.

I've always gave it a prime though, just never looked as the turbo will always receive oil if its oil feed is connected.

If its not, either is the motor. :)

yes it should be primed by removing the plug to the CAS and cranking till you see the oil pressure gauge on the dash start to move.

then plug CAS back in and start.

Trucks and heavy diesels need there lines primed because theres no easy way to stop them from firing when you turn them over.

plus the oil feed line is a lot bigger and a lot easier to get to then our low mounts.

cheers

Darren

I put my new turbo on about a year ago, but was talking to a mechanic the other day. He installs turbos on trucks, and made a point about priming the oil lines before the engine is started for the first time. This is so the turbo isnt without oil for the first few seconds.

MTQ (the Aust. distributors for Garrett) says 'yes'. They recommended that this be

done when they supplied my T04Z.

I cut ignition and injectors by pulling fuses; and turned the car over till

oil came out the feed line, connected the feed and cranked a few more

seconds before replacing and firing it up. This is much easier IMO than

watching for oil coming from the drain side; though possibly not as thorough.

It took a surprising amount of cranking - for about 5 seconds a go, about

6 times (30 sec or so total) to see the oil come out the feed line.

Regards,

Saliya

This is much easier IMO than watching for oil coming from the drain side; though possibly not as thorough.

There's no logic in the statement. :D

If you think about it its actually easier shoving a small ice cream container under the oil drain prior to connecting it to the block. Much tidier than trying to catch the oil leaving the oil feed. As for one being more thorough than the other.. well... yer :)

It doesn't mention anything about priming the oil lines before hooking them up in the Nissan service manual.

can't be too bad, just so long as you can see that the oil pressure and water temp isn't skyrocketing, it should be fine. let the car idle for about 10-15 minutes and monitor the vitals before you go leaving black tyre marks all up and down your street.

Edited by Ol_Mate
There's no logic in the statement. :P

Hey,

Sure there is; I connected my turbo and all lines/drains for fit prior to putting fluids etc. in the motor

because I had to fabricate the lines and the drain.

So I had to remove something in order to verify the prime... that would be the drain underneath

(a pain) or the fitting on top (trivial :glare:).

I should mention all my oil lines are braided; doing that with inflexible pipe

would be another thing entirely.

If you think about it its actually easier shoving a small ice cream container under the oil drain prior to connecting it to the block. Much tidier than trying to catch the oil leaving the oil feed. As for one being more thorough than the other.. well... yer :)

If you have a known-fitting drain, then maybe you prime it before you

refit the drain, as you say. Because mine had to be test-fitted, once it

was there I didn't want to remove it again...

I mentioned it might not be as thorough because the entire assembly's not primed;

the actual difference is probably negligible.

Regards,

Saliya

just stick your fingers down the intake and grab the compressor wheel while you start the engine.. if it's not spinning for the first few seconds until you get oil pressure the bearing can't be damaged :)

(no responsibility taken for damage to fingers caused by spinning comp wheel :P)

yes it should be primed by removing the plug to the CAS and cranking till you see the oil pressure gauge on the dash start to move.

then plug CAS back in and start.

Thats exactly what ive always done, and will be doing in a few weeks. :P

All thats needed if you know for certain the lines were clean when being installed on the car

Thats exactly what ive always done, and will be doing in a few weeks. :)

All thats needed if you know for certain the lines were clean when being installed on the car

I was told to put a teaspoon full of 10W30 in the inlet.

Then spin the compressor wheel by hand a couple of times

Then pull the CAS or if you have plug wires disconnect them and crank for a couple of times.

Then let the car idle for a couple of Min's, then your good to go.

I think it might be a good idea to bleed the cooling system after a turbo-change too. Was reading another thread about a turbo which failed, possibly because air was in the cooling system and may have lead to engine damage.

  • 5 months later...

Keep on crankin'. :P

It took mine quite a while; give it shots of 20secs or so then give the starter a rest for 20 or so then do it again.

Not sure if the starter cool down is required or not; I didn't like the idea of hammering the starter too much.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, the latter. No diff should have a centre replaced without checking clearances because its unlikely to be the same as whatever came out. Not that that stops most people just checking a new centre in
    • Major thread necro but how bad of a job is it to DIY? Looking at it online it looks like if you reuse your ring and pinion as long as those are in good condition it should be fine to just pull the axles/front cover and replace the diff that way? Or should I be replacing everything and doing preload measurements/gear mesh testing like the factory service manual mentions for the rear diff?
    • in my list I had the R33 GTR as the best Skyline. Infact I had all GTR's (33>34=32), the NSX, the GTO, the 300ZX, the 180SX, the S15 better than the FD RX7. I had the MR2 and the A80 as 'just' better. I also think the DC5R Integra looks better but this is an 01 onwards car. I also think the FC>FD. It's almost like aesthetics are individual! The elements @GTSBoy likes about the FD and dislikes about the 180 are inverse in my eyes. I hate the rear end of the FD and it's weird tail lights that are bulbous and remind me of early hyundai excels. They are not striking, nor iconic, nor retro cool. The GTO has supercar proportions. I maintain these look much better in person (like the NSX) especially with nice wheels and suspension which is mandatory for all cars pretty much. Some (or all) of these you have to see in person to appreciate. You can't write a car off until you see one in the flesh IMO. Like most people we probably just like/dislike cars which represent certain eras of design or design styles in general. I also think the 60's Jag E type looks HORRIBLE, literally disgusting, and the 2000GT is nothing to write home about. FWIW I don't think the Dodge Viper Gen1's have aged very well either. You can probably see where I rate bubbly coupes like the FD. I know we're straying now but the C4 and C5 absolutely murder the Viper in the looks department as time goes on, for my eyes. Wouldn't surprise me if people who love the FD, also love the MX5, Dodge Viper, Jag E Type, etc etc.
    • I used to hate R31s, and any of the other Nissans that led up to it, and any of the Toyotas with similar styling, because of the boxiness. They were, and remain, childish, simplistic, and generally awful. I appreciate R31s a lot more now, but only the JDM 2 door. The ADM 4 door (and any other 4 door, even if they are unique compared to our local one) can eat a bowl of dicks. The Aussie R31 is also forever tarnished by their association with stereotypical bong clutching Aussie R31 owners of the 90s and early 2000s. I think the Nissans of the 70s (other than 120Y/180B/200B) are far superior looking to the 80s cars. The 240K era Skylines are boss. The same is broadly true of Toyotas. Hondas don't ever register in my thinking, from any era. Mitsus are all horrid shitboxen in any era, and so also don't register. Subarus are always awful, ditto. Daihatsus and Suzukis also don't generally register. They are all invisible. I think the SW20 MR2 looks fiddly. The 3000GT/GTO is like that but way worse. Too many silly plastic barnacles and fiddly gimmicks ruined what could have been a really nice base shape. Kinda-sorta looks like a big heavy ST165 Celica coupe (and I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing). I think the 180SX is dreadfully bland. It's not bad looking. But it has no excitement to it at all. It's just a liftback coupe thing with no interest in its lines, and bad graphical elements (ie wide expanses of taillight plastic on the rear garnish). The S13 Silvia is a little better - getting closer to R32 shapes. But still....bland. S14? Nope. Don't love it. S15...a little better. Probably a lot better, actually. Benefits from not being like a shrunk in the wash R34 (where the S13 was a shrunk in the wash R32 and the S14 looked like a Pulsar or something else from the stable on Nissan mid 90s horrors). The Z32 was hot as f**k when it came out but hasn't aged as well as the A80. Keep in mind that I think the R33 is the most disgusting looking thing - and out of all the previous cars mentioned is objectively closest to my precious R32. It's just....real bad, almost everywhere you look. And that is down to the majority of what was designed in the 90s being shit. All Nissans from that era look like shit. Most other brands ditto. In that context, the FD absolutely stands out as being by far the best looking car, for reasons already discussed. Going behind the aesthetics, the suspension alone makes it better than almost any other car.  
    • If they just called it the "Mazda Tiffany", it would have been spot on.
×
×
  • Create New...