Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

.86 rear housing, .60 front, made 250kw on low boost, virtually no lagg over stock turbo

Do you have graphs to back up this wild claim? 250kw, low boost, no lag :)

I am in the market for a turbo, so i do have a geniune interest.

before you put up an insult do some investigation yourself. check the link below, the lower rated 28/71r is rated at 390hp which equals about 285 kws.

who is talking bs now??????

http://www.horsepowerinabox.com/HPIAB2/turbochart.htm

great turbo upgrade for rb's. buyer will be happy. depending on sizings, it is the equivalent of the HKS GTRS

larger ARR and trim will be more suited to rb25

i run one in the smaller ARR and trim on my rb20 and made 230rwkws on 18psi with better response than the neo turbo i had on previous

Since item is sold, i'll reply:

before you put up an insult do some investigation yourself. check the link below, the lower rated 28/71r is rated at 390hp which equals about 285 kws.

who is talking bs now??????

http://www.horsepowerinabox.com/HPIAB2/turbochart.htm

Doing research is one thing, understanding it is another :( ; and unfortunately you have not understood the specs.

This turbo is rated at 440hp=310kw approx

This 310kw is at maximum flow at flywheel in ideal conditions without losses, etc. Consider losses in driveline, fuel inconsistancies, engine wear, etc and you'll probably have 250rwkw, but at maximum flow (max. boost), which is far higher than the 12psi claimed.

So try and understand what you read, before going off at people.

rb20inside: The Neo turbo is larger than the r33 rb25 turbo. So yes the Neo would be pretty damn laggy on a 20 :happy: 230rwkw at 18psi sounds about right for this turbo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thank you, this will keep me busy for a bit.  I will update progression.
    • That specific one would be an exchange part, meaning I'd have to send mine to them. Plus it looks like a non AWD sump, which won't work for me. There is one or two shops in my country that I can ask to do a sump extension job and it'd most likely end up being cheaper than sending mine to AUS or NZ and getting one back, and quicker too.
    • Rear turbo is leaky, most likely at the oil drain. From what I could see with my boroscope it seemed to have seeped out at the very top of that return hose. Is it possible that the oil climbs up that hose to then leak out? Yup, coolant leak on the hot side of the engine, only noticed after seeing clear rusty residue in the block right from the turbo oil feed downwards to the pan, and red droplets hanging from the pan. No clear sign yet from where it comes, and most of the lines there are hardlines right? Last year, seeing those red drops, I thought it was power steering, will be glad if that is not leaky at least. Another leaking hose I found by chance is the lower of the two heater core hoses coming from the firewall to the back of the head. That one is not too bad to get to if I have to replace.
    • I think for response I'm already kind of out there no? he -5s are not the best pick for that as the Internet tells me. Maybe I should switch to -7s while I still can? Though that almost definitely warrants an engine pull along with the other issues I have.
    • Which I agree with. I don't want or need a high hp straight line car, I want it to be fun on the road and nothing more. Hence why I said my max power goal will be around 500 crank. The few times I drove the car last year I didn't even use high boost and it was already quick enough for me, should have been around 380-400 crank I think (2860-5s at 1-1.1bar).
×
×
  • Create New...