Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi everyone,

does anyone know the standard specs for a WHEEL ALIGNMENT on a R32 gts-t? i have access to a 4 post hoist and wheel aligner to sort out the uneven wear on my tyres(sux) but not sure of whats specs i should be aiming for. any help appreciated. thanx guys :):banana::banana:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/163128-wheel-alignment-for-r32-gts-t/
Share on other sites

The suggested road alignment settings as follows;

Front Camber = 1.00 negative

Front Caster = 7.00 degree positive (basically as much as you can get, slightly more on the LHS as it helps with the drift to the gutter)

Front Toe = Zero

Rear Camber -0.5 to 075 degrees negative

Rear Toe = 2.00 mm in on each side

:huh: Cheers :O

hey sydneykid,

for a r32 gtst that see's the track 5 times a year and has whiteline adjustable caster/camber, what do you recommend?

Thanks in advance

You have a decision to make, do you want to compromise the road tyre wear or the handling on the circuit?

If you want to sacrifice the handling on the circuit in order to improve the road tyre wear, then the above are the settings for you.

If you want to sacrifice the road tyre wear in order to improve the handling on the circuit , then the suggested road alignment settings are as follows;

Front Camber = 2.5 to 4.0 negative

Front Caster = 7.00 degree positive (basically as much as you can get)

Front Toe = Zero

Rear Camber -1.5 to 2.0 degrees negative

Rear Toe = 2.0 mm in on each side

The best recommendation (no compromise) is to get your wheel aligner to show you how to adjust camber, and then mark the adjusters for the 2 settings. That way you can do it yourself at the track, while you have the car jacked up to put the R tyres on and change the stabiliser bar settings.

:laugh: Cheers :huh:

The suggested road alignment settings as follows;

Front Camber = 1.00 negative

Front Caster = 7.00 degree positive (basically as much as you can get, slightly more on the LHS as it helps with the drift to the gutter)

Front Toe = Zero

Rear Camber -0.5 to 075 degrees negative

Rear Toe = 2.00 mm in on each side

:wave: Cheers :(

thanx sydneykid you rock ;)

hrmmm that goes against my most recent wheel alignment sheet. :(

Front:

Castor L - +6 degree's 14'

Castor R - +5 degree's 35'

Camber L - -0 degree's 23'

Camber R - +0 degree's 18'

(inner and outer adjustable, currently max'd out which is the way I put them in for the drive to the wheelaligners, there appears to be a heap of adjustment in there as when fitted to max neg camber it looked like it had excessive track look neg camber)

Toe L - -0 degree's 15'

Toe R - +0 degree's 26'

Rear:

Camber L - -0 degree's 19'

Camber R - +0 degree's 14'

Toe L - +0 degree's 19'

Toe R - +0 degree's 14'

---------------

It drives straight, doesn't tramline, solid straight braking and has excellent turn in compared to before doing the bushes where the castor was completely buggered.

I did the bushes in stages and found the tramlining was caused by the shagged castor bushes.

Replacing the upper control arm bushes did nothing noticable apart from make it adjustable. :wave:

The arse end does feel a little light and there is a strange wobble from the rear when putting the power down in third gear ~70-80km/h on left hand turns. It almost feels like the arse end sits down and steers the car in to the corner a little more.

I suspect I may have a shagged rear rack rod end as subframe bushes have been replaced and everything else is in great nick, shocks are still standard so they are probably not helping ;)

Prior the front end had around 2degree neg camber and it did feel noticably better mid corner. I might take it for another wheel align and push SK's recommend 1degree neg in to it and sort the large almost 1 degree castor difference?

Cubes: Not sure if you know this or not, but a lot of people dont. Those wheel alignment sheets are in degrees and minutes, so the second number only goes up to 60. So you have 41' (~0.67deg) more on the left, which isn't too bad, used to stop the car drifting towards the kerb due to the camber of the road.

I'd be more concerned that he's given you some positive camber both front and rear! The toes arent very even either, bit over 1mm on the front in and 4mm on the rear in (total), so the values aren't too bad, could just be a bit more even, not a huge problem though. Is your steering wheel straight?

I would want the cambers evened up to Gary's specs or more. I run 1.5deg on the street and get pretty even tyre wear. Would also get them to max out your castor adjustment, if you've got the adjustment there, you may aswell use it.

Where did you get that done (PM me if you want) because it doesn't look the wheel aligner had any idea what he was doing...

Edited by salad

Yep your right it is in degree's and minutes.

It does track pretty straight on cambered roads.

Its really quite difficult as I remember when I first bought the car with good bushes/shockers etc it felt more composed and stable through high speed corners and had much better turnin less understeer than my previous VS 5ltr Commodore that had a full whiteline/bilstein kit including adj. sway bars with riser kit & rear camber kit etc.

Now it feels heaps better than when the bushes were stuffed but still feels a tad nervous through highspeed corners. Almost as if the arse end is too light.

I should also add.. The cars still at std height, I try to avoid attention. I really want to firm it up in the spring department but have yet to find any one that does std or at least legal height (360mm minimum) springs.

A tad offtopic but have you had any shagged rear rod ends salad? Do they do what I am experiencing with the wobble/twitch when getting on the throttle out of a 2nd-3rd gear corner? It doesn't appear to do it on a right hand bend.

Nah, I've been a bit lucky I guess, havn't had any buggered rack ends, or tie rods yet. But it's only a matter of time as I've seen from other people's track cars. Does sound like a buggered rack end would be your problem though.

easy was to tell is to jack up the rear of the car and grab the rear wheel and try and move it side to side. My cefiro managed to distroy the rear rack ends on both sides at a winton track day, i could move each wheel 5mm or so, needless to say handling was very much affected.

if you want to upgrade and CBF changing the whole subframe, apparently R33 ones fit, and are stronger, however i have not done this yet so i cannot vouch for it.

2nd hand i paid 20 bucks pair from Z imports. New i would say 40 each?

My r32 is showing signs of wear in that area now... so i might look into the r33 option./

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...