Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

bit confused now about which exhaust is best- the mild steel or a stainless steel.

whats the noise differances between these metals???

my exhaust at the moment is a custom 3" dump and front (with no cat) in mild steel upto a middle trust muffler, from there its 3.5" stainless to the end cannon which happens to be a hks super dragger.

i was thinking of changin my dump/front to 3.5" but not sure whether to make it stainless or mild???? any pros and cons guys?

how would it sound if i ditched the middle muffler and just had one cannon at the rear (thats it no cat/ mid muff etc) would this be a good idea or not?

really not fussed about legality, so thats not a factor.

engine is rb30det (25 head) should make atleast 300rwkw.

thanx

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/163306-exhaust-stainless-or-mild-steel/
Share on other sites

Stainless:

is a superior metal.

will last longer.

will looks heaps better.

could be prone to cracking at high temps, but is unlikely (don't quote me)

costs more.

Mild steel:

will do the job just as well as stainless.

is cheaper to buy.

won't last as long but will probably last for long enough while you own the car.

doesn't look as good.

Sound Differences:

Stainless makes a 'ting' sound.

Mild steel makes more of a 'tung' sound.

I'd say stainless would resonate louder.

If you ditched the cat and centre muffler:

Could be on droney side when driving.

It would sound awesome from the outside.

everything I have said is not a professional opinion and is based on my general knowledge.

Edited by KeyMakeR33

Ideally you should insulate the dump pipes (heat wrap or ceramic coat) so it doesn't really matter what metal you use from an asthetics (i.e. bling) point of view.

Mild steel generally handles heat cycling (heating up and cooling down) better than stainless steel and has a lower coefficient of expansion (less likely to crack welds amongst other things).

Ideally you should insulate the dump pipes (heat wrap or ceramic coat) so it doesn't really matter what metal you use from an asthetics (i.e. bling) point of view.

Mild steel generally handles heat cycling (heating up and cooling down) better than stainless steel and has a lower coefficient of expansion (less likely to crack welds amongst other things).

I totally agree with that...in the end...a pipe is a pipe is a pipe...i'd rather have a proper mild steel system with proper welds and bends...also...with mild steel if you get cracks its alittle easier to get it welded up...but that said...stainless steel is alittle lighter...which is always a big plus too...

titanium would be ideal but its would put a semi-permanent scar in my wallet haha

my dump will definately be heat wraped

weight is a factor for me but i dont think there would be a noticable weight differance between the two, ive ditched the back seats for my cage, no a/c condenser or compressor, cf/fibreglass body panels, no big stereo just a deck, etc so that would help.

still undecided... hmmmm, might just leave my exhaust as it is for now, and later buy a apexi n1 3.5" cat back, and get the rest custom job in same stainless 3.5"

If you want to be anal, or if you're interested... :wave:

Mild steel = 7860 kg/m3

vs

Stainless steel (304) = 7930 kg/m3

If you can afford the best, go titanium.

Other than that, I personally prefer the sound from a mild steel system over a stainless one, which is the deciding factor for me.

stainless cannot be ceramic coated they will crack even faster~~ the ceramic stuck on stainless and expand and contract at different rate to stainless and being rigid, the stainless will crack soon enough.....

there is no way mild steel be lighter than stainless, stainless is one of the hardest metal to work with...

I think people use stainless just because they look good also, most Jap aftermarket Xhaust are stainless~~

Mild steel with ceramic coating is more resistant to temperature however will not look as good, more durable I think to temperature changes however not so sure about corrosion

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...