Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all, curious to see how this works out considering the cheap price!

my father owns a race car shop in sydney and we have modified a few plenums before, eg: rb30 rb25 and made custom ones to.

on a rb25 race car, the customer was after the xf throttle body on the front of the plenum. we separated the 2halves and made an aluminium top for it and machined up a block to suit the xf throttle body, all in all, we made runners to weld inside the custom top section! lots of stuffing around to get flow as even as possible, and lots of time and calculations involved! huge job.

although customer was happy in the end as it bolted straight up and we just moved a couple of vacuum hoses around, lost 70cm of cooler piping, and increased curve/less lag on the dyno, by about 10%. so it came on boost a little quicker!

cant wait to see the results, as im sure with some tidying up, and a little tlc (match porting) with a die grinder, could get these (cheap) plenums flowing just as good as the (genuine) ones! if your not scraed to cut it open and weld in a couple of air flow dividers, i honestly believe it will work alot better than the greddy units!

best of luck with this little project, and if you require any help, feel free to pm mate! thanks all, look forward to seeing the results!

cheers, Garth

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well yes i have got a few updates the plenum itself looked pretty ordinary on the outside the inside wasnt too bad at all the runners themselves well looked not too bad although there was a big long piece of aluminium slag on the inside of the plenum uptowards the rear of it which i have recently cut out and have cleaned the inside of the runners with the little burr remover brush thing you use with the die grinder, I have also recieved the q45 throttle body aswell for a very very decent price of 245 delivered from the US and this itself was in remarkable condition, At the moment what is really stalling me is Damn bills, which arent too much of a hassel but trying to find a Flow bench Just and i say this JUST to measure consitancy of airflow through each runner up here in SE QLD, this will give me a better indication of use whether or not to go forth or just say to hell with it go the Original Greddy As seems to be that the problem lies usually in runner design of these plenums Hence lean cyls.

One big notice on these is the lack of available sized Vaccum fittings for the various and numerous hoses, Not really the lack but mainly finding the right sized ones as i have found the holes not to be the best of size, so some work still needs to go into this ie Tap and Die.

The water holes werent in the best of shape with alot of slag bits well everywhere so have also cleaned these up extensively with the die grinder, And to finish it off i would still recommend the head face of the plenum to be milled so its straight, not saying it isnt but you cant be too sure.

So far not much else to say apart from the q45 bolts straight to it no adapter required for them, injectors and fuel rail areas look good.

Not only i have cams coming soon so will go forth with that before this project as i still need a place where i can get better diagnostics on this manifold, At this stage, would still have to confirm id go with Nismo, hypertune, and original greddy plenums as these designs usually come with most bits well greddy ones do, esp the vaccum fittings and bolts which at importing prices at the moment would be your far better option as you wouldnt have to go through the pain of the work, But to close out this matter i would rather need confirmation of runner flow % differences to be utmost happy.

Hope that helps

I have got to ask, Am i wrong in saying it is possible JUST to flow test the manifold without the head? It has to be!... Plus those qld people help me out with flow bench testing for manifolds up ere for me, Im Having damn trouble trying to find one.

I'm doing the same thing for my RB30, I got my plenum today and it was what I was expecting for $250 delivered. I took to a few of the ports with a dremel and they came up beautiful, the only thing I'm worried about it not being able to reach into the back of the plenum to clean it up a bit more. I'm getting the face machined flat because it will definitely leak if I put it on as is.

Some pics -

post-28866-1178004879.jpg

post-28866-1178004932.jpg

post-28866-1178004961.jpg

I'm doing the same thing for my RB30, I got my plenum today and it was what I was expecting for $250 delivered. I took to a few of the ports with a dremel and they came up beautiful, the only thing I'm worried about it not being able to reach into the back of the plenum to clean it up a bit more. I'm getting the face machined flat because it will definitely leak if I put it on as is.

Some pics -

I havnt had a look at one of these but boy they must be darn rough to be any worse than the so called real thing. I am disgusted at the casting quality on mine.

its such an integral part, it would be like using fake chinese injectors

do you really want to risk it ?

I wouldn't really class it as the same risk as using crappy injectors. It's the exact same dimensions as an original Greddy plenum, its only the casting quality that differs. If they went to the effort of sticking them in a CNC machine and cleaning them up I'm sure they'd be worth another $500 at least... but they don't so thats where the dremel comes in. The manifold isn't under a lot of thermal stress like the exhaust side either. To me, the risk is acceptable.

Pics of an original would be awesome, I'd hope they'd be a fair bit better than a copy.

oh please noel post pics of inside and close ups of your Original greddy plenum :)

Get off your lazy arse and come have a looksee Adam. Heck you drive down the coast for absolutely no reason whatsoever.

Heres a good excuse for ya. :)

just to throw it into the mix - even though it is the RB26 original Greddy plenum:

Garage Saurus have cut axially in the direction of the runners and inserted diversion plates along the plenum (i.e. perpendicular to flow of air into the plenum), I assume to redistribute the flow to the cylinders. Do people think this will be necessary in this instance - there must have been a difference in cylinder flow, or else why do it?

I was almost goin to buy one of these and then i heard the bad rap. I got a custom made one for a price i couldnt say no to and told if anything goes wrong (like the weld cracking etc) to take it back and they'll fix it up for me. It also has velocity stacks inside.

Do the greddy and copy greddy ones have the velocity stacks?

post-28112-1178087729.jpg

The water holes werent in the best of shape with alot of slag bits well everywhere so have also cleaned these up extensively with the die grinder

I'd advise pressure testing these as well as I've heard horror stories of them cracking and hydrolocking the motor.

The problem most often stated is uneven distribution of air to the cylinders.

I've heard of really keen workshops having a special exhaust manifold with 6 widebands to test the afr of each indivdual cylinder to check things like this. I guess it'd be a pretty expensive way to test though.

I'll quote from a mag

Its all too easy to look at an inlet manifold and figure that its primary function is one of flow. Getting air into an engine is part of it, but to simplify the operation of an inlet manifold in such a crude way is to understand only a fraction of what it is designed to achieve.

Rather, the inlet manifold on any late-model fuel injected engine is actually a tuned chamber designed to take advantage of a phenomenon known as the Hermoltz frequency. If u could actually see inside the inlet manifold, you'd be able to note that the air doesn't simply rush into the cylinder head, it instead pulses back and forth in unison with the opening and closing of the valves, forming a big column of vibrating air.

Optimising the vibration of the air to get the very best cylinder fill possible is one thing engineers chase more than any other. This is what makes power, gives excellent economy and the sharp throttle response expected of a modern car. Its also something undone by those oblivious to the hours of manifold testing performed at the factory.

So what i reckon that means is spend money on something that is designed and tested.... Not something that looks the goods from the outside.. and a rough job at that.

I'll quote from a mag

Its all too easy to look at an inlet manifold and figure that its primary function is one of flow. Getting air into an engine is part of it, but to simplify the operation of an inlet manifold in such a crude way is to understand only a fraction of what it is designed to achieve.

Rather, the inlet manifold on any late-model fuel injected engine is actually a tuned chamber designed to take advantage of a phenomenon known as the Hermoltz frequency. If u could actually see inside the inlet manifold, you'd be able to note that the air doesn't simply rush into the cylinder head, it instead pulses back and forth in unison with the opening and closing of the valves, forming a big column of vibrating air.

Optimising the vibration of the air to get the very best cylinder fill possible is one thing engineers chase more than any other. This is what makes power, gives excellent economy and the sharp throttle response expected of a modern car. Its also something undone by those oblivious to the hours of manifold testing performed at the factory.

So what i reckon that means is spend money on something that is designed and tested.... Not something that looks the goods from the outside.. and a rough job at that.

So you're wishing you didn't spend your money a huge ass bling camber :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you want to do a single throttle body conversion easily, you won't need to pull anything apart. Take the linkage from your throttle off the linkage controlling the ITBs. Now open the ITBs wide open, and lock the linkages in said position. Now add a single throttle body onto the front of your inlet plenum. No it's not ideal for the last nth of a kw, but it'll be a lot better than what you're already trying to do...   PS, ITBs can be so damn hard to tune from, because roughly 20% movement in a throttle body equates to a change in roughly 80% of its flow (Hence power). When you add up the flow limitations of those small throttle bodys, it is a LOT higher than that of a single large throttle. Hence, TPS is very very sensitive with them, and you do a LOT of work with sensor fusion, and some Maths behind the scenes to make those blends nice, and be smooth.
    • Yep, when Haltech purchased Adaptronic, and all of the Adaptronic staff, including Andy went with it, it took Haltech to the next level. Haltech wanted Adaptronic as they wanted things like Andy's fuel models, and some other IP, AND they wanted Andy too as he is brilliant! Andy has spoken about the incompatibilities between the old 1500 stuff vs Nexxus, and it totally makes sense. It's not JUST software that is different, there is huge changes in the underlying hardware too. It's why Haltech has had soooo many changes in the last couple of years, in terms of Hardware, and Software, and why it has become so damn Amazing. Why do you think guys like Rob Dahm with his quad rotor, went from running Adaptronic's to running Haltechs? Andy. Pretty much, Haltech these days, is Adaptronic, but with more funds behind it, and more staff, and hence Andy's visions, and visions of other people that he helps shape their great visions, into amazing new products. All the new Nexxus gear, whole new software for it, new and better dashboards, the apps that will run on headunits and NOT be slow to respond! I understand people being burnt in the past, but if you're ragging on a company, about products and issues from many years ago, it's more a reflection on yourself, not looking or keeping up with new stuff. In which case, those people should be going back to PowerFC and Nistunes as the ECU's to rave on about...
    • Right, but I thought the problem has been for a while now that even if you know manifold pressure + throttle position you still have non-linearity and aliasing issues vs actual engine load? One way I can see things simplifying is going DBW, then all air going into the engine is represented by the throttle position. As opposed to a random bimetallic strip vaguely linked to engine temperature opening and closing a shutter or some random power steering air valve suddenly allowing a bunch of bypass air. But the same throttle position/RPM at ~atmospheric MAP in different gears is not guaranteed to be same engine load? Honestly, ITBs are of such dubious value IMO. I don't know why these things are hyped up so much. The main benefit as far as I can tell is you reduce the likelihood of cross-cylinder EGR scavenging with significant cam overlap at idle. I would absolutely run speed density and be done with it if not for this fairly esoteric control problem.
    • Hah dont worry, my adult brain has this conversation every single day. Dont waste your money, invest more of it into shares, pay down the mortgage. Then the bedtime insta doom scrolling begins and after being bombarded with gtr's my mind is set: im definitely getting one! I have the current model mx5 as the weekender, but i just miss my boost and literally like your username, the sututu's that come with it. I remember with my 2nd supra, as it had twins and vvti, they used to spool real early, like 1,500rpm so you could just be a spooly boy all day long. Some people say they get over it after a while, not me tho. 
    • If you need to refinance your mortgage and reset the loan terms back to 30 years and cash out on your equity for "investment" purposes *cough* car parts, I can help 😊
×
×
  • Create New...