Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 256
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

1. Ward 979

2. Richmond 967

3. Newton 959 Class turned cheater.

4. Thomson 937

5. Evans 932

6. Blyth 866 Class turned cheater by default. We know what team your on Pete.

7. Foo 847

8. Dean 822

9. Andrews 775

10. G Matthews 765

11. Russman 758 rwd 1st

12. Mav 719 rwd

13. King 701

14. Esposito 697 rwd

15. Adz 685 rwd

16. Boyack 650

17. Juz 631 rwd 1st Ladies

18. Leewah 587

19. Brisby 576 rwd

20. Nick 564 rwd

21. A Matthews 548 1st awd Ladies

Is that what you wanted to see Russ. Your doing well espescially with Ryan out and the other two turned cheater.

Excuse if there is any mistakes.

1. Ward 979

2. Richmond 967

3. Newton 959 Class turned cheater.

4. Thomson 937

5. Evans 932

6. Blyth 866 Class turned cheater.

7. Foo 847

8. Dean 822

9. Andrews 775

10. G Matthews 765

11. Russman 758 rwd 1st

12. Mav 719 rwd

13. King 701

14. Esposito 697 rwd

15. Adz 685 rwd

16. Boyack 650

17. Juz 631 rwd 1st Ladies

18. Leewah 587

19. Brisby 576 rwd

20. Nick 564 rwd

21. A Matthews 548 1st awd Ladies

Is that what you wanted to see Russ. Your doing well espescially with Ryan out and the other two turned cheater.

Excuse if there is any mistakes.

Nice1

ur up there Craig...

Dammit! Stupid cones made me go slow :D I think I'm gonna have to brake a bit earlier next time on the skid pan. Still had an absolute ball though! Thanks for getting the results up so quick Chris.

I had the same problem, in a lot of the battle events I would have placed in the top 8 or higher if I didn't hit the cones :sleep:

Doesn't really bother me cos I had a great time out there, and was happy with how I went for my first deca, at least the GT-Rs put on a strong show against those Evo's :P

1. Ward 979

2. Richmond 967

3. Newton 959 Class turned cheater.

4. Thomson 937

5. Evans 932

6. Blyth 866 Class turned cheater by default. We know what team your on Pete.

7. Foo 847

8. Dean 822

9. Andrews 775

10. G Matthews 765

11. Russman 758 rwd 1st

12. Mav 719 rwd

13. King 701

14. Esposito 697 rwd

15. Adz 685 rwd

16. Boyack 650

17. Juz 631 rwd 1st Ladies

18. Leewah 587

19. Brisby 576 rwd

20. Nick 564 rwd

21. A Matthews 548 1st awd Ladies

Is that what you wanted to see Russ. Your doing well espescially with Ryan out and the other two turned cheater.

Excuse if there is any mistakes.

Looks like we have our 2008 Motorsport Secretary lined up! :dry:

I had the same problem, in a lot of the battle events I would have placed in the top 8 or higher if I didn't hit the cones :dry:

Doesn't really bother me cos I had a great time out there, and was happy with how I went for my first deca, at least the GT-Rs put on a strong show against those Evo's :)

hehe..stupid cones. last deca = 0 this one = lots..i had more fun this time round for sure..at the expense of cones and times...but thats not what its all about!

Good work Chris. To see you back on the top with so little recent seat time.

More then anything you look at the guys up the top and the cars they are in. Goes to show it doesnt realy matter what car you are in, its more to do with how you drive them

Seat time is helpfull. Racepace engine's are a must. Car is so much stronger everywhere.

P.S Next DECA will have personal fire extinguishers in the supp regs.

We have had a few close incidents @ DECA in the past and I think it will save someone's car one day and possibly someones life.

So get moving now. SAU will organise a group buy for some before then. Alternativly, K-Mart sell extinguishers for $30 with a metal bracket. It's worth it.

Doh...I've only just realised I left my hoodie at DECA over the weekend :) Army green, "Nique" branded...I think I left it on the circular concrete thingy next to the skidpan...

Prolly a long shot, but did anyone pick it up by any chance??

P.S Next DECA will have personal fire extinguishers in the supp regs.

We have had a few close incidents @ DECA in the past and I think it will save someone's car one day and possibly someones life.

So get moving now. SAU will organise a group buy for some before then. Alternativly, K-Mart sell extinguishers for $30 with a metal bracket. It's worth it.

For what its worth, Supercheap Auto have metal bracket 1kg extinguishers on special at the moment for $19.95, runs until May 27 I think (I'll check next time I am working there).

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...