Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok guys my project 32GTR has come to its end nearly!

look out for it cruising the streets of sydney, number plates - - - URWSHN - - -

mods are as follows:

stock block - hot tnaked

new 33gtr crank

cp forgies 20thou over

stock rods, forged, linished, balanced

acl balck face bearings

arp rod bolts

oil stoned deck

new genuine nissan head gasket

n1 water pump

n1 oil pump

oil restrictor in head

head cleaned slightly

stock cams for now, will get poncams when motor is run in

cleaned up stock plenum

100mm cooler

044 in tank pump

sard reg

sard 720cc injectors

splitfires

iridium plugs - gapped to .7mm

power fc

adjustable cam gears

twin garrett 2860r-5

z32 air flow meters

oil cooler

stock b.o.v's

tomei baffled sump

car has previously run 11.70 with veyr little mods.

looking at running 22-25psi on shoot-out mode with some avgas added to the fuel, up the octane!

im hoping for 400rwkw, but i think these turbos will be my downfall! see hwo we go!

so let me know what you think, or how you reckon the car will go, and similar power figures maybe some of you have had!

cheers to all that have taken the time to read about my project! and if you see it cruising around flash ya lights whatever!

hope to see some of the fellow sydneysiders out at wsid when i go for the 10sec pass, on cruises, track days and at shopping centre car parks! hahahha yeah right!

see ya later all.

thanks

Garth

330-350rwkw. Stock cams will be your downfall there and will limit you around that point.

After than, you wont get over 400rwkw on PULP. Probably 370-380rwkw, could be a bit more. Depends on how happy the dyno is really.

Dont use AVGas. Just use a properly designed fuel like Sunoco, C16, Elf Turbomax and the others that dont come to mind

If you do use decent fuel, you should be able to make 420-440rwkw with as much boost screwed in as you can

So thats my bets in. Pretty general, but its pretty much what everyone else is making, so you shouldnt be a lot different in that regard

And btw - drop your sig size, its waaay to big (check the forum guidelines for sizing) :pwned:

Dont use AVGas. Just use a properly designed fuel like Sunoco, C16, Elf Turbomax and the others that dont come to mind

If you do use decent fuel, you should be able to make 420-440rwkw with as much boost screwed in as you can

I've heard there is unleaded avgas out and about now if you can find it.... I was thinking of running it for the next tune...

I'm not too sure the stock bov's will handle much past 15psi and may leak. :cheers:

I've heard there is unleaded avgas out and about now if you can find it.... I was thinking of running it for the next tune...

I'm not too sure the stock bov's will handle much past 15psi and may leak. :cheers:

To quote someone famous:

Dont use AVGas. Just use a properly designed fuel like Sunoco, C16, Elf Turbomax and the others that dont come to mind

If you do use decent fuel, you should be able to make 420-440rwkw with as much boost screwed in as you can

Avgas is designed for aero engines that turn over at a low rpm setting at constant speeds for hours on end. Not for an RB26. Use the proper fuel as it will burn better & generate more horsepower.

What rev limit you using im worried about pushing mine any futher then 8500rpm with the N1 oil pump. i think with cams you can run 360-380rwkws you will not need more for the street, if you need more for the Drag track just add 50-100 shot of NOS. And invest in GTR gearboxs HAHAHA

As for current power 315rwkws at 20psi my guess

I've heard there is unleaded avgas out and about now if you can find it.... I was thinking of running it for the next tune...

I'm not too sure the stock bov's will handle much past 15psi and may leak. :cheers:

Stock GTR BOV's are good for over 600rwkw.

They are good for a measly 15psi with small twins :D

thanks for the imput!

i believe i have the right set-up (with the cams) to make 400rwkw, if not, go shopping and buy a big single and external, then hope to mkae 500rwkw! it just keeps going on and on...

endless $$$ hahaha. thats cars!

thanks for all the responses and i will let everyone knwo the results when i get them!

thanks Garth

why buy a gtr to boast about the RWkw? theres a reason theyre 4wd and a reason there are 4wd dyno, if u wanted a high rwkw car, then why a gtr? i reakon 336rwkw :D

Edited by dead32

Why are you guys having a go at him? Sounds like he's doing this to get a 10 second quarter mile, not to get 400rwkw.

I think you will get it, the 10 that is. Dunno why you wouldn't put cams in while building the engine though.

Its definatly not impossible to make 400rwkw on pump but it will cost you - proper head and chamber work

done by someone who knows there sh#t, def cams and possiblly valves only said valves cause

thats what it took for us to make 435rwkw (98) and made it on more than one DD dyno.

Ryan

thanks for everything guys, at the moment im not changine the cmas on the run in tune! just wanna drive it. and yes i wanna crack the 10second barrier in my GTR. as for the rwkw, just easier way to measure power i guess, against other cars, cause not many cars will be keeping up with it around a track or on the old pac! hahaha!

nah im sure there are other fast cars out there that will probably beat it, but thats fine.

as for racing on the streets, nah dont do that, my dad would kill me as he builds drag cars for a living! so to answer it no i dont race, but i give it a squirt here and there! nothing crazy!

sounds good about c16 i think, avgas was my question as i could get it readily from a good friend of mine, and i work in the aviation industry!

as for the power figures, i was guessing 380rwkw with cam and c16, but if it gets more beautiful! and if it doesnt run a 10 second 1/4mile time, ditch them turbos and put the big single on, just to run a 10! keep the twin set-up for track days etc!

thanks to all for comments and advice, appreciated highly!

but cams will be done before the big tune... only going to use the poncams anyways! so it aint that big of a job is it?

cheers guys i will try and post some pics up soon if i can get them to load without being to big!

thanks once again!

garth

  • 3 weeks later...

garth how u goin dude...

u will get high 10 second passes with the setup u got now..

it was my car before and i was passing the line at 119.9 mph... with shithouse launches due to not wanting to break the box.

this was with only a clutch, dash 5's, and boost, still retained stock ecu and fuel system and mount, and obviously an exhaust

119.9 mph is pretty close to a 11.0 pass, that was with 19 psi screwed in..., with afew more psi, you wont have a problem catching 10.80, i recon...

only if u can drive it like me...

lol

speak 2 u soon dude.

denis.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...