Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have been debating for a long time now which exhaust to get, and i think ive finally come to a decision. I think im going to go with a Blitz NUR Spec, i have heard good things about these exhausts, they have good sound, they are a full stainless system, and give good performance upgrade.

Ask EGA41T he has a NUR SPEC on his S2

all this talk of jap brand exhausts needing mufflers, etc. being cut out makes me wonder why people still buy them?

i'll stick to kermit spec exhausts. :)

Unfortunately, not all of us have that option though. I asked kermit about an exhaust and got a quote roughly the same as a bolt on system, and that didn't include the cost of the resonator and canon that I would have to supply myself.

I personally lean towards the NUR spec myself.

Just make sure you end it in a big ski ramp jap style! :)

I have an R32GTR Nismo exhaust on my Stagea. It was quiet, but effective on the GTR (300 rwkw) and seems equally so on the Stagea. Makes no more noise than standard at up to 3,000 rpm, so great from highway running perspective, zero resonance. Over 3,000 rpm it allows the normal RB type howl, audible but never annoying.

The guys at Liverpool Exhaust and I modified it to fit the Stagea, added around 100 mm before the rear subframe and around 80 mm after the rear muffler (ie; extended the tail pipe).

:nyaanyaa: cheers :domokun:

Well I did a bit of research on the Blitz NUR Spec R... and it was looking real good until I looked closely at the photos of the Cannon.... and the tip is angled!!! Call me fussy but personally I cant stand angled tips :P

Right now the HKS looks the goods... :banana:

Does anyone know whether something like this would require much modification to fit a stagea?

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/NISSAN-SKYLINE-R33-...1QQcmdZViewItem

I know its a cheap chinese brand or whatever it is.... but i just want something very cheap that does the job. :)

as sydneykid said, they need to be lengthened a tad, but the rest of it fits fine.

im 99% sure even just adding a bit in between the cat and the cat back will be suffice, but how sydneykid did it is probably a more snug fit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Meanwhile, 20+ years ago, I pulled out the 105mm hole saw and went straight down through the inner guard in front of the airbox to get my stormwater pipe cold air intake in. Right behind the two stock holes for the intercooler pipes. Those have no reinforcement (apart from a couple of robust pieces of steel pipe through them!). I feel that the Australian vehicle standards crews put way too much emphasis on "maintaining the crash performance" of cars and not enough consideration of "any crash is a new and wonderful experiment with a random selection of parameters and you will never be able to tell if an extra 80mm hole through some sheet metal caused a significant difference...but if you close your eyes and squint at the whole structure, engage your engineering brain and have a good think about it, you'd have to expect that it would do jack all."
    • You guys are focussing on the wrong part of this post and have headed off on an irrelevant tangent!  Clearly I'm not going to put my most prized physical possession (well it will be once I'm finished it...) on a piece of shit contraption that might fail and crush me or my car!  At no point was that even implied I was trying to buy a butchered P.O.S that some shonky clown had thrown together with a gasless MIG....  Either way I would love to see the build quality of a rotisserie that has failed.  Actually I'd love to see a photo of one that has failed full stop.  Google fails to deliver.  Never happened?? I'll either make one that won't fail or will buy one that wouldn't fail! End Post.....
    • Yeah, if you can't breathe for more than about 2 minutes, you're cooked.
    • Well, all the power should be getting dissipated across the starter motor. Therefore, ideally, the voltage drop across the earth lead should be convincingly close to zero. Certainly you'd want it to be only a volt or so at max, because otherwise that volt doesn't turn up at the starter to do what is required. A car can probably survive a bad enough earth to crank and start with only 9V or so at the starter motor, maybe even a bit less. But you're seeing only 8V at the battery terminals when cranking, so there can't even be that much available over at the starter, which simply won't do. I would have thought that you couldn't pull enough current (with a healthy starter) to make the battery drop to 8V locally. But I was ignoring the possibility that the starter is in fact crook. If it has shorted windings (or maybe the solenoid is borked and shorting to earth) then I guess it could pull a stack of current and not even look like wanting to turn over. So follow the other boys' reccos too. Because they are just as likely at this point.  
    • Depending where the whole gets drilled, and what country/state you're talking about, quite likely not.   Under ole vehicle mod rules in NSW, VSI06 allowed for drilling of holes in "non structural" areas. So you could drill a hole through the inner guard, and not need engineering. You couldn't drill over seams, and it was advised to add extra reinforcing around the hole, as well as something to protect from sharp edges.   Again, it's all about finding the documentation for where the mod is to be done, AND then being able to explain the situation, with the documentation as to why you don't need engineering, with a positive attitude, to any one of the likes eg, police, vehicle inspector, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...