Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

?????

there is an r34 gtr in perth running a Trust T88 turbo and a nismo plenum, so i dont understand why you shouldnt

Hmm, how about because they cost a large lump of money & don't do a great deal to help your motor.

Things to think about:

1. The most convincing reason to run a single throttle body is to allow a MAP sensor to work in a more stable airflow environment, ie allow it to work better.

2. If you are running AFM's the half the reason disappears.

3. What else can you do with the $1000 odd dollars?

4. As mentioned the closer the throttle butterfly(s) are to the motor itself the better the throttle response will be.

5. The Group A cars ran the manifold with out mods so how about "It was good enough to win three SATCC's & two Bathursts" as an argument?

6. I think bkc meant coherent rather than cogent. To ne a cogent reply would entail it having a persuasive argument in one direction rather than the more balanced approach that was taken.

Hmm, how about because they cost a large lump of money & don't do a great deal to help your motor.

Things to think about:

1. The most convincing reason to run a single throttle body is to allow a MAP sensor to work in a more stable airflow environment, ie allow it to work better.

2. If you are running AFM's the half the reason disappears.

3. What else can you do with the $1000 odd dollars?

4. As mentioned the closer the throttle butterfly(s) are to the motor itself the better the throttle response will be.

5. The Group A cars ran the manifold with out mods so how about "It was good enough to win three SATCC's & two Bathursts" as an argument?

6. I think bkc meant coherent rather than cogent. To ne a cogent reply would entail it having a persuasive argument in one direction rather than the more balanced approach that was taken.

This money of them it needs the hunk and the flag & Dob respects your motor and because it does not do with the proposal the Hmm, as summary. Approximately will think,:

1. It works inside the air current environment which is stabilized and the ie and understanding the reason which runs the agency body which is simple works well and it it puts it permits the map sensor.

2. When you run the AFM anti- and the reason disappears.

3. It spreads out what of that outside and $1000 odd it is and in the dollar to do it is good?

4. When being under referring, compared to, kkap in agency butterfly (s) motor form compared to sickle agency answer back.

5. "Regarding it 3 SATCC's& 2Bathursts" it was winning enough it is good in argument and to peel as group A it ran the multiengine like this from in the mods which it kicks?

6. Me by the bkc the cohesion characteristic which means rather it is appropriate and it thinks. The answer which will be appropriate connecting was rather adopted the assertion convincingness inside 1 direction it it is compared to process percentage approach head percentage theyn the place.

Fixed.

Check out Hypertune for their plenums as all of the current fast GTR's run and the soon to be returning GTR-700 use them.

They come in 90mm and 102mm. hope that helps

Thank you very much .

thank you so much for your time :)

This money of them it needs the hunk and the flag & Dob respects your motor and because it does not do with the proposal the Hmm, as summary. Approximately will think,:

1. It works inside the air current environment which is stabilized and the ie and understanding the reason which runs the agency body which is simple works well and it it puts it permits the map sensor.

2. When you run the AFM anti- and the reason disappears.

3. It spreads out what of that outside and $1000 odd it is and in the dollar to do it is good?

4. When being under referring, compared to, kkap in agency butterfly (s) motor form compared to sickle agency answer back.

5. "Regarding it 3 SATCC's& 2Bathursts" it was winning enough it is good in argument and to peel as group A it ran the multiengine like this from in the mods which it kicks?

6. Me by the bkc the cohesion characteristic which means rather it is appropriate and it thinks. The answer which will be appropriate connecting was rather adopted the assertion convincingness inside 1 direction it it is compared to process percentage approach head percentage theyn the place.

Fixed.

I am sure that took quite a bit of effort. It demonstrates that you are a very strange man.

or, to put it another way

Effort large conform to taking. Personage for not ideal unstrangeness.

I am sure that took quite a bit of effort. It demonstrates that you are a very strange man.

or, to put it another way

Effort large conform to taking. Personage for not ideal unstrangeness.

I don't understand what do you mean!!

Hmm, how about because they cost a large lump of money & don't do a great deal to help your motor.

Things to think about:

1. The most convincing reason to run a single throttle body is to allow a MAP sensor to work in a more stable airflow environment, ie allow it to work better.

2. If you are running AFM's the half the reason disappears.

3. What else can you do with the $1000 odd dollars?

4. As mentioned the closer the throttle butterfly(s) are to the motor itself the better the throttle response will be.

5. The Group A cars ran the manifold with out mods so how about "It was good enough to win three SATCC's & two Bathursts" as an argument?

6. I think bkc meant coherent rather than cogent. To ne a cogent reply would entail it having a persuasive argument in one direction rather than the more balanced approach that was taken.

The trust T88 , 1050 hp muximum but nismo plenum 650 -700 hp air input nearly !!!! :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I buy my wheel cleaner in 4 litre bottles now. Euro brakes are brutal
    • Sounds like it may all just be some baseless outrage stoked by the carexplore guy? As in the linked social media outrage on facebook just goes back to carexplore as a source again. Further shown by the council response that nothing actually has changed: "The Private Land Use Permit has been part of the Casey Community Local Law for a number of years. It's important to clarify that this permit is not new, and no changes have been made to the permit or the Local Law in relation to the permit." The full council response in Prank's link sounds reasonable to me. Saying that as someone who neither lives there nor has a front yard to call their own  
    • Clutch hydraulics are also all good, looks like a brand new slave cylinder and everything bled up well. No idea what the actual clutch is, and I don't intend to pull the box off on the floor to find out, so unless we have trouble on the dyno or at shakedown that will remain a mystery for the new owner
    • Front brakes are G4 8 pot calipers over 330mm discs with braided lines. Everything looks good, pretty sure these are off my old 350. Pads are brand new and judging from gold colour are Winmax which is what I also run on my race car, Neil and I both sourced brake stuff from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney who really knows his stuff Everything has bled up nicely with all new Motul RBF600 fluid, there were 2 loose hard line connections and the calipers were new on the car so I ended up doing it 3 times but it is perfect now
    • So, starting with the rear brakes. They look like standard R33 GTST, and will need new pads shortly (less than 5mm material, probably only 1 day left). The slotted discs (probably DBA) are near new at 18.01mm and the lines are braided
×
×
  • Create New...