Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Matt.. I was thinking.

Could you see your self with 250-300rwkw and a .........

.........GTR?

The 4 wheels trying hard to grab traction in second with your eyes being sucked back in to your skull. :uh-huh:

Matt. Watch..

http://www.japanesemotorsport.com.au/46rot...tor2003Kier.mpg

I mainly wanted to get on here so I receive updates.

Without looking back through the threads I presume the rebuild is happening at RPM. I spoke with a guy recently at the Morpowa day regards his car at RPM having the exact same thing done due to ring land problems. I dont want to spark any Microtech vs PFC debates however I cant help but wonder if the knock sensing abilities of the PFC might have saved you.

Yep Greg, RPM are doing the rebuild. And yes 3 x RB25DET rebuilds in recent mths (all due to similiar failures). RPM was chosen by the respective owners to carry out the rebuilds. Not because they (RPM) were responsible for them! Just wanted to make that VERY clear to all :)

The PFC has not saved some from the same fate ;) I know of 3 PFC equiped GTS25t's that have had failures of the same kind. In fact one of the WA guys on SAU (who's running a PFC) had a rebuild recently for the exact same thing.

Not being familiar with the PFC knock detection, I guess it comes down to how quickly the driver reacts to the warning? For example, how quickly would the damage be done @ 7000rpm in 4th? It wouldn't take much to cause a failure under those conditions. By the time the knock detection had giving a warning, & you'd noticed it (I'm usually focused on the road/track doing 7k+ in 4th), the damage is done. But like I said above, I'm not familiar with the PFC knock detection. It uses the engine check light to flash its warning, yes?

I just remembered which forum member had the GTS25t, running a PFC, that let go just like mine. Killer T

Have a read of my posts in the later part of this thread! http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ghlight=rebuild

I had a strange feeling that things were going to go wheels up on me! Nothing was wrong with my car/engine at the time, nothing at all. I always seem to be a step ahead of myself ;) Wish I could put that to good use somehow?

Rob,

Not all of them were making large power. One was from a suspected bad batch of fuel. Another was on the dyno (had gone from ~160rwkw to ~220rwkw via a new ECU, + other mod's) when it let go.

I wouldn't be too concerned about failure @ the 160rwkw mark mate. As per usual, it's all in the tuning. The more safety margin in the tune, the less likely your are to have a failure. I'd say that @ 250+rwkw with standard internals, you need a safety margin.

Another important point - If running stock injectors @ higher than stock fuel pressure, make sure that the fuel pressure is VERY stable, i.e make sure your fuel pressure reg does a very good job regardless of temp's. Its all too easy for the pressure to drop slightly & if the A/FR has been set-up so there's only a small safety margin then that pressure drop is enough to cause an unwanted BANG!

Knock detection is certainly a v/good idea. Knock detection that retards timing the millisecond it detects it! Knock detection that gives you a warning you have most likely already damaged your engine isn't much good.

And finally, remember we are talking about engines that usually have a few k's on them (sometimes hard driven with mimimal maintenance).

I poped through RPM today and Matt..

Your car still looks as clean as ever.

Those tyres look damn nice.

How on earth could you consider selling it. It has to be the nicest R33 I've seen.

Tim was telling me that microtech soon are releasing a L16 I think he said that has the provision for knock detection, speed input hence traction control etc..

Sounds good.

Matt, I remember reading your going for 300rwkw. Are you sticking with the same turbo?

Thanks for the kind words mate :) Trust me when I say I'm not the one who has considered selling it! If it was up to me (& me alone) it wouldn't be going anywhere :P

If, in the very unlikely event, I do manage to keep it then I'll see how much more the current turbo has got in it? I'll aim at running ~18psi on the new motor, depending on how the injector/fuel rail issue goes. As part of the rebuild I'm hoping to get larger injectors & a custom fuel rail (IF it doesn't blow the cost out too much) Why? Well I'd like to get to use the car to full potential for a few months before selling :)

Knock detection with timing retard & traction control would be very nice features to have.

One bit of advice, run it in properly. Load it up by full throttle up hills but DONT rev it out for at least 1000 kms. Other wise u will hurt the engine and it wont perform as good as it should. Dont put addatives in the oil such as Slick 50. Do it right and u will have a great motor , i know its tempting to give it a REV but just go easy for a bit and it will last u alot longer.

Hey u wanna swap it for my car :]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, in 2007 he must have been charging about $1800 an hour. He only looked at the car for 5 minutes. And another 4 to write the report wrong, and another minute to correct it. Mind you, this was for a car that was: Stock engine, fmic (hole in drivers guard), all alloy intake and custom air box, 3 inch turbo back exhaust, lowered, and a set of 17" Advans (255/40/17 rear and 235/45/17 front). It was nothing crazy. The blue slipper wanted the "hole in the guard" engineered. But that was because he got the shits that I wouldn't "relocate the battery from the boot, back to the factory position in the engine bay"... In an R33 GTST...     Also for emissions, E85, and don't go wild on timing. It's amazing how the closer you get ignition timing towards max torque, the last couple of degrees really throw NOx counts right up. And for the huge increase in emissions, it's only a small increase in torque.
    • He'll be looking down and swearing about "the damn apprentice" for trying to convince Duncan to use percussive maintenance... 😛  
    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
×
×
  • Create New...