Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've noticed there is a fair bit of engine management threads and discussions going on.

Just thought it might be an idea to start its own sub section to put all the engine management and tuning threads into it.

The forced induction section is currently being used quite a bit for this. But lets face it, engine management is a big enough topic on its own to have it's own section.

I feel the forced induction section is kind of getting overrun with engine management questions/topics, but that's just me.

Its just an idea I'm putting forward to you to improve the ease browsing the site. If it's not convenient or not really applicable at this time than I understand.

Thanks,

KeyMakeR33

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164917-new-section-idea/
Share on other sites

As the mod for the area, i dont feel thats the case personally. I would like to see it all stay as is.

I think its a good idea to keep it all under the relevant area. Like Turbo tuning info stays in FI, NA tuning in NA.

It would induce more confusion i feel if they were intermixed.

When you look at all the Mod/Main sectional areas, they are split into General areas, rather than specific.

Just my take on it being in there daily

Thats fair enough then. I respect your feelings on it. At the end of the day, it's not me that makes the decision, but rather it's for yourself and the administrators to discuss and make the decision.

It wouldn't really phase me if it happens or not.

Maybe we need more feedback on the matter. What does everyone else think of the idea?

i agree that there needs to be a section for things that cover more than one of the current ones. engine management, diagnostics, consult, engine sensors, piggybacks, and so on - no topic in any of these areas belongs in any specific forum, but most often they are created in the forced induction simply because its more popular, not because its the most appropriate place to create the thread.

the mechanical sides of things are covered well, and the na/turbo split works fine there, but not for the non-mechanical side of things.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I can do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
    • The funniest part I saw, was someone would bitch and moan on FB about something, Andy would be the one to respond, asking for more info, if he could contact them, what the engine setup is, what their config file was, and 95% of the responses were people just going "der! It doesn't work" and Andy going "What doesn't work?" And then going "The firmware!" And they'd go around in circles as no one could ever give information, and Haltech couldn't fault things on the bench, (especially when people wouldn't give any specifics).   Many moons ago, when Andy was back at e420c stage, he reached out to me, and asked me to test different plug and play looms for him (already had an e420c in the car on his V1 PNP loom). And he kept asking me, as I was competent enough to be able to give him some specific feedback on what was/wasn't working, how to replicate the faults etc, and work through things with him. Most people are terrible at answering the questions they're asked, or being able to provide quality feedback other than "it doesn't work".
    • I say it often, none of this stuff is really Skyline-specific per se. But in general there's not a lot of people who actually know what they're doing. A lot of people charging like they do. Agile software development probably isn't the greatest idea for an engine controller.
    • Incidentally, I also put v3 of the tune on the car and did an oil change from 5w20 to 5w40 to see how it affected oil pressure in the mid to high end. I'm still happier with the thicker oil and will stick with it, but clearly the system is happy with 55psi even if I'm not! It's well within the service manual specs...but they are very open
×
×
  • Create New...