Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yes, that's what i meant. Airflow is 1080-1100 when on idle.

If i rev it does go back to the same level.

Is that a bit high?

I wonder if I've soldered the wires incorecctly but i thought it wouldn't work at all if i did that.

It's a series II so i had to share the 2 ground signals (from memory)

Also, I've been looking around at maybe getting a replacement or still hanging on to the fact that this one is OK and just set up wrong.

I saw a unit on the Jap Auctions and looks as if the signal ground (guessing) has it's own 'C' clip that would bolt onto the body for grounding rather than going thru the ECU.

Also, that wire was extra long on the Tomei plug which suggests it should be different and had the length to be wired into the chassis.

Would this change the behaviour of the signal overall?

..and, if peeps are looking at getting one, they are on nengun as a Tomei branded Z32 for $360 delivered.

If i get a replacement, i think i will get that one.

It's so much freeegan hassle to get around this and i don't wanna risk getting another dodge one.

And that is possible as i don't think these other dodge ones were sold to rip people off, just the seller, even reputable sellers, didn't know about this bad batch ???

Anyway, just putting it out there as an option, bit more expensive but only $50 over the cheapest I've seen.

..and, if peeps are looking at getting one, they are on nengun as a Tomei branded Z32 for $360 delivered.

Yer, they're the ones i just got and will be installing within the next few days.

Funnily enough tho, they came in a what looked to be a genuine nissan box :D

Thats correct as its not a genuine Nissan part number - Its a Bosch part number

The Bosch Z32 AFM still has the Nissan (JECS) part # on it (22680 30P00 A36-000 N62) and the Bosch part # is on the box (F00E000202).

Yes, that's what i meant. Airflow is 1080-1100 when on idle.

If i rev it does go back to the same level.

Is that a bit high?

I wonder if I've soldered the wires incorecctly but i thought it wouldn't work at all if i did that.

It's a series II so i had to share the 2 ground signals (from memory)

I had a look at datalogit log I took some time ago.

My Z32 afm on idle see's 1165mv on average. It never sways more than 10mv either way providing I don't touch the steering or pump the brakes. :stupid:

But it is a 3ltr so it 'may' suck a little more on idle.

Yes, I got the dyno done and the replacement Z32 is working fine. Not so happy with the power output though of 200kw non shootout mode. It is a low reading dyno, but I was expecting more power.

At 1.3bar it's making 190kw at 5500rpm, but then it just flatlines the power curve. Even at 1.5 bar it gives slightly better mid range, but the same flattening out of the power curve occurs. The boost does not drop off at all with the AVCR, it holds steady to redline. My tuner thinks it's the justjap intercooler I bought, and suggested that I replace it for a thicker ARC item with low pressure loss. The AVCR Duty cycle is at 40% and holds boost steady. Knock count is at 14 W.O.T. with an AFR of 10.0 from 6000rpm to redline.

What I have is;

Series 1 RB25DET with 1.8mm headgasket. (newly built with 6000km run in)

Standard cams

Apexi pod filter & Z32

Greddy Inlet Manifold

Apexi Cast top mount exhaust manifold

Garrett GT30/40 .63

Tial 38mm external wastegate

Greddy Type R BOV plummed back

Power FC and AVCR

720cc Nismo's.

60x30x76 tube and fin FMIC with 2.5" piping throughout.

3" exhaust from the turbo back.

Should I put money towards an ARC intercooler, or should I install a set of 256/264 hks camshafts next?

Is the 1.8mm headgasket lowering compression so much that it is effecting the amount of boost I have to run to reach my target of 250kw?

Edited by silman

Well Silman, at least the Z32 is sorted

Did you find when you swapped it over and started the engine, it was crap idle and needed an obvious retune, or was it still OK to drive just with more room to move on the verticle axis?

Birnie - is you new AFM working well now? Has it been tuned.

1. Is there any comparison Dodgy vs New with regards to volts at idle?

2. Anyway we can tell a bad one before the tuner has almost completed a tune

I am getting a new one, making sure it doesn't have the Nissan embossing but not sure what else I can do..

Cheers fellas

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...