Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys,

Not sure really what im after.. I have a R33 Gts-T S1, Zort (3' dump to hi/flow cat 3.1/2' out, IC, Pod, New splitfire Coils, Sparkplugs and boost t @ 11.5psi. New RB25 Highflowed turbo, ECU or SAFC and Fuel pump to come.

Basically what i wanna know is what does the Powerfc do compared to a SAFC of some decription. I dont know what all the techincal setting do and how they work.

I want about 200kw or there abouts from the upgrades but do i really need a powerfc will i gain alot of power with one of these or will a SAFC do?

Just some serious thoughts please guys. If a SAFC is required what type and why?

Cheers in advance

:P M

Edited by O.I.C Napster
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/165517-difference-between-safc-and-powerfc/
Share on other sites

SAFC is a piggy back comp to lean out fuel and such. Not a real performance upgrade.

PFC is a complete ecu replacement where you can change engine management parameters for performance. The PFC will enable you to get 200rwkw.

The SAFC can yield some good results if u have other supporting mods. Its limited by lack of injector control. Basic piggyback upgrade.

THe PFC doesn't take you form 140 atw to 200atw. Supporting mods do but the PFC is a really good upgrade.

Have a look in the Forced Induction Section there are a few current threads on the emanage atm.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
×
×
  • Create New...