Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

These babies have been around for ages and are now extinct, except for the 2nd hand ones floating around which I've grabed and installed.

....It seems that nearly everyone has got over excited and posted results on the standard injectors/AFM stage and hit around the 230-240's on about 1bar/14psi....but then if they went any further, forgot to put those results up?

I've been searching for ages and can't find anyone with a solid 17psi dyno with some decent injectors/fuel pump/AFM and the usual supporting mods.

Is there anyone?

Post em up peeps!

I'll be going the 17psi in a month or too and will post it up.

Just itchin to know how people went in the meantime.

Thanks.

Birnie

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/165596-want-some-solid-hks-2535-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I scored 240 @ 17-18psi but running really, really, rich. (stock ecu with central 20 chip)

gtr fuel pump, stock injectors, adjustable fuel reg n other supporting mods

Waiting to get the power fc tuned, and i will keep u updated

2535? best thing in my life :):(

edit: rb25 :)

Edited by DjeMz
I scored 240 @ 17-18psi but running really, really, rich. (stock ecu with central 20 chip)

gtr fuel pump, stock injectors, adjustable fuel reg n other supporting mods

Waiting to get the power fc tuned, and i will keep u updated

2535? best thing in my life :):(

edit: rb25 :)

Now we're talking!

Geting some good results coming thru, keep em coming..... :)

DjeMz - What are you doin man!

Get an ECU and see your car come ALIVE !

cln, rob told me no one ever believed it and he did it a number of times to shut people up..

Justin911 is now using that turbo.

And no it wasnt 25psi thru the turbo.

DjeMz: Robs tuning wont disapoint you :)

djemz: rob from creatd is confident 2530s and 2535s are good for 250 and upwards.

with a 2530 he made 255 on his drift 33

Happy dyno??

Worth a review of published data from Garrett. Considering the GT28RS (aka Discopotato) with flow maps and a compressor spec near-as identical to the 2530 is rated to 320 CRANK hp, the claim seems a bit high.

Still, if that's what he got, and it's backed up by times down a strip or round a circuit, then who cares? Great result if that's what he got.

nope not a happy dyno at all, rob doesnt mock up his figures :)

He used it for drift and used to tear up 3rd gear like you wouldnt believe.

Its a HKS turbo, HKS turbos flow better and are better than the hks turbo, said by many many tuners i have spoken to.

:)

Has these figures been backed up on another dyno? Did Justin run his car at the SAU - RE Customs Dyno Day, if so what did he get?

260rwkw on a gt2535 is optermistic and claiming anything higher is just BS.

Should convince Justin to come to a SAU dyno day :(

320hp = 246.4kw at the crank @ 1bar

drive-line losses is about 30-40kw. Running 17-18psi may give you an extra 30-40rwkw, but remember this is a smallish turbo, thus will not make much more power at higher boost levels above 18psi.

was reading a old hks book the other day noticed that hks's 320 p/s power fig for 2530 is running them on only 1 bar

as was p/s ratings for 2535,2540 etc

so at 1+bar they will make more grunt period

remember HKS turbo's are manufactured to be most efficent at 1-1.5 bar

:santa:

Has these figures been backed up on another dyno? Did Justin run his car at the SAU - RE Customs Dyno Day, if so what did he get?

260rwkw on a gt2535 is optermistic and claiming anything higher is just BS.

Should convince Justin to come to a SAU dyno day :thumbsup:

320hp = 246.4kw at the crank @ 1bar

drive-line losses is about 30-40kw. Running 17-18psi may give you an extra 30-40rwkw, but remember this is a smallish turbo, thus will not make much more power at higher boost levels above 18psi.

I did the same before but assumed I was wrong Al.

340hp @1bar is on close to the edge of its efficency. Bump up the boost wont yeild massive HP gains...just some more torque.

~250 seems possible on 18psi as suugested. His drift car must be running more boost and have some decent internals.

Eitehr way its gonna be a good result from the upgrade.

past 240rwkw i dont think you will make any more power

every extra psi you dial in just induces more detonation and bugger all power per psi past 1 bar

the compressor probably cant supply any more useful past 1 bar of compressor speed

then how do people make 290 - 300 kw with a gtrs so iv read on this forum?

They don't. Dyno read outs don't mean shit unless you run all the cars on the same dyno, on the same day.

I have a HKS GTRS, with extensive head porting and Tomei cams. Boost was set to 18psi, but b4 peak power it dropped down to 16psi and made 268rwkw.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
    • WRXs are a pure pleb boring car these days. You need to get an STI to even get close to what a WRX used to be.
×
×
  • Create New...