Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

FTR my R32 GTR produced 300rwKW recently

Standard Internals

Standard Injectors

Standard Fuel Pump

Standard AFMs

Standard Cams

7500rpm Rev limit

Garrett GT2560r Turbos

Trust / Greddy Front and Dump pipes

Jasma 3" Exhaust

PFC with PFC Boost control

Runs High 11's @ around 190kmh

Car produce's the numbers at the dyno and the track, but dont get to excited as does not feel that fast in day to day driving.

Linear power delivery (almost straight line on dyno graph) plus 4WD grip makes it all feel kinda...Meh!

thats pretty good actually

standard injectors, stock pump, stock AFMs, and stock engine running 11s.

i heard those Trust front/dump pipes work really well.

He said rebuild the RB26, not the parts on it... Any car needs parts to make power.

Rebuilding an RB26 requires attention to detail (read:cost)

Sorry...you use the same part again.....keep everything the same...just stick back everything that is broken...lol

Well if you were using stock parts would more than likely would be needing a rebuild, being a stock GTR is pretty reliable.

So someone thats busted a motor probably already has turbos and fruit on there.

They have chased power, and gone beyond the limit

Your pass at 190km's an hour is more to me like a low 12 second car......what is your 60f time....?

What type turbo is it?

Well like I said its a high 11 car.......it ran a 11.9 with a 1.794 60ft, and last time I checked that makes it an 11 second car :(

When I bought the Turbos they were called Garrett 2560r, it is equivilent to the GT-SS, N1's etc

For the sum of my cars parts it performs quite well, and goes to show you can achieve a 300rwKW goal reletively cheap and easily.

This however is the point of diminishing returns....to go a little bit faster now is going to cost a lot more money :rolleyes:

FTR my R32 GTR produced 300rwKW recently

Standard Internals

Standard Injectors

Standard Fuel Pump

Standard AFMs

Standard Cams

7500rpm Rev limit

Garrett GT2560r Turbos

Trust / Greddy Front and Dump pipes

Jasma 3" Exhaust

PFC with PFC Boost control

Runs High 11's @ around 190kmh

Car produce's the numbers at the dyno and the track, but dont get to excited as does not feel that fast in day to day driving.

Linear power delivery (almost straight line on dyno graph) plus 4WD grip makes it all feel kinda...Meh!

I basically have the same setup, the difference being standard ECU and 2860-7 turbos.

Running 18psi i get 240awkw, and the injectors and AFM are at 95%. So i'm wondering will the different turbo and PFC make that much of a difference???

thanks

are u sure its the 2560?

Sounds like youve got the 2860R-7s :rofl:

+1

Sound like you have the groupA(Garrett-7) (N1)type......

Great time....1.78 odd 60f.......190km.....11.9 second.

My car passes the line at 200km.......1.7 odd 60f....12.3 seconds...drag meet times.

Must have a great kick in 2nd gear.....what tyres have you got?

Was this a race type meeting were you were up against others ...or was like how most manufactures give the times for the car.......

IE Not taking re-action times on launch.

Well if you were using stock parts would more than likely would be needing a rebuild, being a stock GTR is pretty reliable.

So someone thats busted a motor probably already has turbos and fruit on there.

They have chased power, and gone beyond the limit

Yes and NO...

Some just have boost controllers and dial up higher settings......or thrash their cars when they are cold.

I have heard of some melting Pistons because tuners have not noticed spark plugs being burnt.This is due to lower fuel levels being delivered to

the chamber,correction is quite easy...increase fuel on that injector...etc..etc..etc.

Some fail due to the fuel pump going at high revs.

Some just unlucky too...cam gears....bolts on cam gears or timing belts breaking......

Some failures have been caused by oil pumps on most RB motors...such a bad design..as I have stated before.

But the worst one I have heard was a oil relocation filter being blocked.

All motors can blow without the correct...safety and tuner settings and not just the people who chase power and have all the right stuff fitted.

+1

Sound like you have the groupA(Garrett-7) (N1)type......

Great time....1.78 odd 60f.......190km.....11.9 second.

My car passes the line at 200km.......1.7 odd 60f....12.3 seconds...drag meet times.

Must have a great kick in 2nd gear.....what tyres have you got?

Was this a race type meeting were you were up against others ...or was like how most manufactures give the times for the car.......

IE Not taking re-action times on launch.

ive got hi flows though and i run a 12.3 with a 1.7 60ft at about 108mph? i think thats about 175km

and my hiflows are very laggy as i have no engine management other then a mines ecu

+1

Sound like you have the groupA(Garrett-7) (N1)type......

Great time....1.78 odd 60f.......190km.....11.9 second.

My car passes the line at 200km.......1.7 odd 60f....12.3 seconds...drag meet times.

Must have a great kick in 2nd gear.....what tyres have you got?

Was this a race type meeting were you were up against others ...or was like how most manufactures give the times for the car.......

IE Not taking re-action times on launch.

i get 11.4 @ 195kmh with a 1.6-1.7 60ft

+1

Sound like you have the groupA(Garrett-7) (N1)type......

Great time....1.78 odd 60f.......190km.....11.9 second.

My car passes the line at 200km.......1.7 odd 60f....12.3 seconds...drag meet times.

Must have a great kick in 2nd gear.....what tyres have you got?

Was this a race type meeting were you were up against others ...or was like how most manufactures give the times for the car.......

IE Not taking re-action times on launch.

I have taken this GTR to the drags on 3 seperate occasions, i'm not into drag racing just like to get a time after I have made a modifaction.

1st time out in car when it had 315rwHP it ran 3 x 12.6's at 180kmh 2.1 60ft

2nd time out with same HP but Button Clutch resulted in a 12.4 @ 178kmh 1.9 60ft

3rd time out with power increased to 400rwHP I did one pass only which was an 11.9, I looked at the timesheet and figured I was'nt going to beat my 1.7 60ft from that run, and the rest of the run was pretty flawless, so was'nt going to go any faster, had got my 11 second pass, so went home :rofl:

ive got hi flows though and i run a 12.3 with a 1.7 60ft at about 108mph?

You have less HP than me.

i get 11.4 @ 195kmh with a 1.6-1.7 60ft

You have more :mellow:

i'm running a048's hit the limiter for launch, probably bounce for a bit and wait for rev to drop and pick up again then go for second. the the rest is pretty simple. i am sure i could improve on my 60ft with a tamer launch and a shorter shift to second. without hitting the limiter so much. but it does sound good haha

I basically have the same setup, the difference being standard ECU and 2860-7 turbos.

Running 18psi i get 240awkw, and the injectors and AFM are at 95%. So i'm wondering will the different turbo and PFC make that much of a difference???

thanks

Hell yeah, try around 60rwkw with a tuned FC and retaining injectors and AFMs

Injectors are near maxed at 240rwkw cause of the stupidly rich stock ecu

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
    • Ask me a bit later this week before payday
    • I agree that delayed payment probably isn't the most suitable solution. It seems a solid complete transaction would be best. As I wouldn't be using this sale as a line of credit that would typically earn interest, we can probably arrange a much cleaner single transaction deal. I can do $92.52 today. Would you prefer EFT, or Cash on Pickup?  😛
×
×
  • Create New...