Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What would be the cheapest way to strengthen the bottom end and be reliable for my setup

would gtr rods, Forged pistons do the trick?? i was tryin to stay clear from opening up the engine but hey, if i want the power and dont want it to blow up then i have to do it.

im more worried about how much it will cost to get someone to do it.

any suggestions and what parts to get will be good.

thanks

A headgasket is good insurance on your bottom end. Will have a slight adverse affect on your response however. Id suggest spending the money to get rods and pistons. Its good insurance and you will feel alot better knowing that its done everytime you put your foot down.

Well you can't have your cake and eat it.. Most rb25 rebuilds drop the comp ratio down to 8-8.5ish with forged pistons anyway.

The rb25 rods are underestimated. Keep rev's under 7500ish rpm and there's no need for forged. They will hold what ever the gt3540 can make. GT40+ and definitely rods.

Well you can't have your cake and eat it.. Most rb25 rebuilds drop the comp ratio down to 8-8.5ish with forged pistons anyway.

The rb25 rods are underestimated. Keep rev's under 7500rpm and there's no need to change.

I dont disagree with you at all, though personally if i was going to really push my engine to 300+ id just want that extra confidence that forged internals would give. There is no dout that this car is going to have to rev to make power.

they make all turbo pistons that are forged a lower compression ratio because obviously your going to pump it with boost and power.

But for 8s and stuff they up the ratio.

also a metal headgasket will drop it further, so yeah safer boost.

If going forged internals go speak to Brad about a package of spool rods and CP pistons, he does a good deal last time I checked.

What would be the cheapest way to strengthen the bottom end and be reliable for my setup

would gtr rods, Forged pistons do the trick?? i was tryin to stay clear from opening up the engine but hey, if i want the power and dont want it to blow up then i have to do it.

im more worried about how much it will cost to get someone to do it.

any suggestions and what parts to get will be good.

thanks

I dont disagree with you at all, though personally if i was going to really push my engine to 300+ id just want that extra confidence that forged internals would give. There is no dout that this car is going to have to rev to make power.

Don't take my post the wrong way... Wasn't indended to come across as a disagreement. :P

You are right.. A gt3540 on a rb25 you want rev's as it won't really get moving until 4500-5000rpm behind a 5speed.

To make the most of the turbo you really want to spin it to 8000rpm and to do that reliabily as with all the rb's it requires some work with rods/pistons and oil.

sounds like i might have to go for the rods and pistons option.

Does anyone know how much it would cost to get these fitted????

i already have bought a 1.5mm metal layered tomei head gasket.

Does anyone know if the nismo rb26rods fit into a rb25???

Yeah might have to speak to Brad about the pistons and rods.

Thanks

It would be a good idea to get oversized pistons 20thou or whatever is recommended to you by your workshop. Have your block taken out to suit so its all nice and fresh. Rb26 rods will be fine for the 25 they are compatible.

Don't take my post the wrong way... Wasn't indended to come across as a disagreement. :P

You are right.. A gt3540 on a rb25 you want rev's as it won't really get moving until 4500-5000rpm behind a 5speed.

To make the most of the turbo you really want to spin it to 8000rpm and to do that reliabily as with all the rb's it requires some work with rods/pistons and oil.

Agreed it would be better if he could get those revs up to around 8000rpm he will make more use of the set up that way. Aslong as he takes your advice on the oil aswell he should be able to build a reliable engine up to making the most of his gear.

Edited by fEkuaR

I've seen an RB25Det with the GT3540 (0.82 housing)on it run over 400kw to the tyres. Boost was around 32lb i think. Aries pistons and crower rods, stock cams, and an un-ported head. It also had a metal head gasket and ARPM head studs. Crank was stock.

It barely got boost in 1st gear, in 2nd it came on like a switch at 5000 rpm with instant revs past 7500 and a hail of wheel spin and tyre smoke, same deal in 3rd and 4th.

3lt bottom end is the way to go, but if you cant afford that, doing pistons and rods so you can safely rev it past 7500 reliably, and maybe a GTR crank is the way to go. There is one in the parts section that has the JUN crank collar fitted for the oil pump thats reasonably cheap. Every bit of displacement increase you can get will help reduce lag a little.

Also, keep in mind oil restrictors for your head or you'll end up with no oil in the sump if you rev above 7500. Or you can run an external oil return to the sump.

See how one mod leads to another... and another.. $$$

Good luck with it.

Ian

Edited by Vspec R33

well i bought this turbo for 1500 came with custom split dump to cat, with exhaust manifold and oil line.

you can get them cheaper but couldnt be bothered looking around anymore.

So yeah mods that i'll do is

Nismo rb26 rods if they fit.

Either CP Pistons or ACL Pistons.

I'll look into rb26 crank, but i have heard that they either dont fit or have to change something else to fit it.

Port and polish head with poncams and valve springs.

and yeah definately get oil restrictors for the head.

So yeah looks like its going to be a bit costly but yeah im in no hurry to do this, so i'll get stuff one by one.

If you are going to all this expense to get the most out of a cheap turbo, wouldn't you be better off binning it and getting a turbo that better suited to the stock engine? 3071 or 3076 would be the obvious choices, one will make just under 300 on reasonable boost, one will make a bit over.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...