Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

looking at buying my old mans 33, he is old and fussy so i know its been well cared for, what more good reason to do it?

its a practically stock 95' R33 auto, it already has a microtech comp in it, and a cat back 3'exhaust and split pulse dump pipe, now i am plannin to add FMIC, 3"front pipe+3" cat, highflow turbo, injectors and larger fuel pump, could these mods see me too atleast 230rwkw and possibly upwards?

cheers mick

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/166219-230-250rwkw-33-auto/
Share on other sites

looking at running around 17psi i am sure the highflow would be in about the meat of its effeciency at this point. no way am i feeling down about an auto. got a VL turbo in the shed with 300kw thats a 5 speed and would much rather an auto in it,

boostd-its a 4 speed auto, how much power did you have to run 12.2?

id definitely get an auto trans cooler and a temp gauge installed next if you plan to be giving the auto a bit. the heat kills the boxes. with a shift kit/valve body upgrade they are unstoppable.

the mods you listed should see you into the 250's quite easily.

looking at running around 17psi i am sure the highflow would be in about the meat of its effeciency at this point. no way am i feeling down about an auto. got a VL turbo in the shed with 300kw thats a 5 speed and would much rather an auto in it,

boostd-its a 4 speed auto, how much power did you have to run 12.2?

The 4 speeds are stronger from factory so u should b able to run that power without cracking the trans open...and a trans cooler would preserve it some more.

I did that time with 244rwkw a 2800rpm stall and cheapo chinese street tyres.

when your going around a corner and your not on the throttle much if the revs are going down it can change gears on you- so if your just just hanging onto the corner it will spin you out of controll and its pretty hard to catch.

what do you mean?
when your going around a corner and your not on the throttle much if the revs are going down it can change gears on you- so if your just just hanging onto the corner it will spin you out of controll and its pretty hard to catch.

wrong...

my s1 r33 auto has never done that once in its life, and will only kick back in gears at full throttle, or if you drop down to below about 20kmph.

they are a very predictable trans and i highly rate them once there modded....

thats why i asked for it to be explained, it hasnt happened to me. it wont happen if you know how to handle the auto.

you can predict when it will kick down.

playing with the TPS can adjust the kick down (although you wont get 100% throttle), but not completely stop it.

i was asking about the track killing the autos from heat. does anyone have any tips besides a tans cooler and a temperature gauge?

Sorry, what I meant is if you are going sideways in a manual and slightly back off it will reduce wheel spin and straighten up in a controlled manner, however an auto on backoff lets off alot more on slight throttle decreases due to the stall convertor and causes snap back. Mine has a high stall which I'm sure makes it even worse.

what do u mean wrong, mine has done it before. what you talkin about u clown don't just come on and say someone is wrong maybe urs doesn't do it but i know personally of four cars that do

you and your mates car may need a trans service and some adjusting.

the skyline should never kick back a gear unless you want it too. as i said before either by flooring it , or by slowing down to around 20kmph.

If your trans is downshifting at speed with no throttle then you have some other issues that needs looking at.

as suggested TPS, fluid level etc.

cheers

The Clown....

Sorry, what I meant is if you are going sideways in a manual and slightly back off it will reduce wheel spin and straighten up in a controlled manner, however an auto on backoff lets off alot more on slight throttle decreases due to the stall convertor and causes snap back. Mine has a high stall which I'm sure makes it even worse.

it all comes down to practice.

with the auto you need to drive thru the slide and power out the other end.

while with the manual you can more play with the throttle and feed it on and off thru the corner.

both work well but you need to adjust your driving accordingly.

If your car will spin the wheels in drive then it becomes easier to control to a point , at which you get to much forward momentum and then that creates its own issues.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
    • I know right. It baffled me. There's no way when the engine is off, key is in ignition, (coils are dissconnected aswell), also my sound system was dissconnected (I don't run any audio capacitors), battery reads 12.2v and with the 10amp fuse blown I was measuring 24 to 30v. The reading would move a bit from 30v to 24v which was weird. I took a pic of the multi meter reading 🤣: (This is a brand new single channel digital oscilloscope that also has a multi meter mode).   Before when the fuse was blown, I had one lead on the 12v supply (green/white wires) of that brown relay and the other lead on the negative battery terminal. When I turned the key on ignition (engine off), it would read 30v. Then when I removed that relay from it's plug and tried putting ignition on again, it would read 12v, but I think it's because it can't turn on the ecu now that I removed it. I asked Chatgpt and this is what it had to say:   Not sure if those theories would be possible but, any auto sparkies here? welcome to confirm. 🤷‍♂️  No idea, but if it happens again, atleast I know what type of issue it is, unlike last few months where I didn't know what was causing all my issues and I was just taking stabs in the dark to figure out what type of problem it was. If it does happen again I'm going to investigate futher and trace back the source even more and inspect more circuits. I drove it to work this morning and the car drove and boosted fine. Yeah I was thinking the same, so I've imported my back up saved map (which is the map that I saved when it got done tuning) back onto my haltech with the base fuel pressure set to 43.5psi.
    • Yeh nice, if your in melbourne could you recommend any exhaust shops in the east that do a good job?
    • Sorry yes, this is what im after Also, that jpjdm site appears to be offline
×
×
  • Create New...