Jump to content
SAU Community

Which ECU would you buy today, based on YOUR knowledge/exp?  

146 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Adaptronic e420c (www.adaptronic.com.au)

Is emerging quite strongly around the world. Is an australian designed built, programmed and backed

The creator will help on the technical side with customers. The owner/designer is a car nut, and is in it to help us out form his passion.

The numerous amount of features, the ease to tune, the auto tuning features, just millions of reasons.

And to buy with a loom from memory is around $1070, quite cheap for the huge amount of features. It's being proven time and time again too.

And the company is now rolling into doing plug and play looms also.

  Cyprus said:
best ecu = Wolf .. simply because of it's features ... the only reason you all don't like it iz because no1 knows how 2 find good tuners for it

and you dont think this is a good enough reason? this is a prefect reason to not like a specific ecu

judging by your comments the a mines ecu is the best, but only one place in the world can tune them but it still good right?

whatever ecu a person choose there should be lots of local tuners who can work on it

that way you arent locked into sucker pricing and arent stuck with one tuner who may or may not be able to deliver what is required

IMO the best ecu for almost any skyline is the factory ECU with an emulated tune. It has all the features allready their and usually with small mods only light tuning is required. The factory ECU has more tunability for an experience tuner than a PFC with any of the locally made software or hand controller. A major differnce between the factory GTR ECU and the GTR PFC is individual group sequentail firing of the front and rear three cylinders whereas the PFC averages the two MAF inputs and delivers a single injector pulse(depending upon injector flow rate per cylinder within the software). Both systems have quite good closed loop control and good timing control.

Wolf:

Lots of features however many of them dont work - may be later version 4 and above they may have ironed out some issues. Looks good on paper but lack firness. Poor closed loop operation from what I've seen. However available in plugin and is realatively cheap. We actually pulled a wolf V3 from an S14 and retuned the factory ROM using an emulator - the customer couldn't believe how much better the car drove even with his level of mods.

Motec:

Expensive - must pay for upgrades for each extra option. However good ignition and injector control, average PI cam control shithouse PI boost and closed loop lambda control. Can input many maps for everything to get around bad PI and PID loops.

Autronic:

Very good ignition and injector control, very good closed loop PI based boost and lambda. Best ECU capable of returning OEM quality. However lots of setup involed with various inputs and little help from manufacturer. Should be only setup and tuned by reputable autronic installers or tuners.

Microtech:

Average injector and ignition control - great easy of install and hardly ever issues with installation. Great value for money and quick tuning.

Edited by rob82

Have run link plus, was a nightmare -driveability, tuning, fuel consumption all terrible. Spent countless hours on the dyno but couldnt fix niggling problems like starting (hot or cold), nasty hesitation coming onto throttle etc. I initially chose due to the impressive feature list :)

Currently using PowerFC, besides the handcontroller being a pain in the arse to read in anything but perfect light its has performed well, cheap to tune (with plenty of options when it comes to tuners as well). Definantly better featured ecu's around in terms of features (launch control etc) but its hard to beat thanks to price and ease of use.

Personal experience with the ems on mates car is its a very good thing, driveability, fuel consumption cold and hot start all on par with the pfc in my car. Unfortunately some outputs on the ecu arent functional as claimed in the specs (8860) although ems assure they will shortly be available with a software update (which the ecu needs to be sent to ems for).

Autronic gets the vote

  • 2 weeks later...
  timma said:
yeh with wolf ecus being hard to find someone to tune it i think thats a good enough reason to not want one.

i found Wolfs new software for the V4 , PLUS / V400 a lot easier to tune . Also looking at some of people maps who have tuned these Ecus , they never use the The fuel modifiers features like battery and Air temp compensation , if you set up these compensation scales correctlly before you Tune it your afrs are going to a lot more stable under the changing condtions , The more features you use correctly on the set up the finer your tune will be , with out trying to mask them with a rich or lean mixture in the your main map and not use the fuel modifiers .

Edited by Cameron_Datto

well i know for a fact that the microtech i had in the rx7 was easy to tune with ben from in tune gettin a very safe and well tuned outcome in a matter of 20 minutes. ive only ever dealed with microtech and am buying ltx12 as i only know microtech....

Edited by timma

For myself...

PowerFC - Cheap, Knock display, and such awesome drivability/idle/cold start/warm start, cheap as chips to tune, good fuel economy.

Knock display is extremely valuable.

Now that its not widely available.... I would still consider modifying an rb26 pfc to suit an R32 gtst or if i had a 33 I'd still adapt the rb26 pfc and run a couple of jaycar rpm trigger kits to work the vct. All for the knock display + its $828 delivered :)

I have used the PFC with twin Z32 AFM's for my 450 kw setup and it preformed flaweless, but now with the new drag race engine in, the PFc wouldnt suffice, i switched to autronic for the MAF deletion that it offred. I use the SM 4 model, it is a great model, the auto tune option takes a lot of guess work out of the equation, the mapping is easy and the car pulls like a rocket

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...