Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

SAFC: SAFC II

GearBox: AT

Turbo: r33 hi-flow front/vg30 rear

Exhauset: 3inch splitdump, wrapped.

Air Filter: open pod

Injectors: Factory

Intercooler: Copy Hybrid

Fuel Reg: Stock

Fuel Pump: Stock

Boost Controller: rb20 act. running 10-12psi

BOV: plumb back

234.9rwkw@10-12psi

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Just for the guys asking about the Fuel Pump

If you want around the 200rwkw then you need a new pump, the stock will reach its limit about 170 - 180rwkw.

then you can wid the boost up a little more aswell cause fuel supply won't be an issue.

I think thats what happened to me, cause i had my boost set at 12psi but it was knocking so they had to drop it to 9-10. Do you think by getting a new fuel pump, putting the boost back up to 12 and getting it dyno'd again will get me to 200?

I think thats what happened to me, cause i had my boost set at 12psi but it was knocking so they had to drop it to 9-10. Do you think by getting a new fuel pump, putting the boost back up to 12 and getting it dyno'd again will get me to 200?

stab in the dark but it could be your spark plug gaps for 10psi plus boost they should be gapped at 0.7 - 0.8mm gap

Yeah i guess if you got that power on stock fuel pump then itshouldnt matter, but mine could be stuffed. Wouldnt hurt changing it anyway its not that expensive compared to buying a new ecu.

r33madd i gapped my spark plugs to .8 when i changed them after i got the car. Would changing them to .7 help?

my car made 200.2kw without an safc and my afr at 10.5:1 top end, on 12psi dropping back to around 10psi top end also. What do you guys think I could gain with a safc??? and say tuned at around 12:1 afr??

I have a 96 r33 s2 with 3" turbo back zorst, fmic 600*300*76mm, high flow fuel pump and stock turbo with steel front wheel? ( series 2 should have plastic one.)

Cheers

Russ

Roughly what kind of time is required on the dyno to get one of these doovas working properly. I have read about 1.5 to 2 hours yeah?

yea mine took 1.5 hours but it can also depend on your car and the tuner

so do you reckon that i should be investing in a upgraded fuel pump before i get a dyno tune with my safc?

will there be much of a gain if any?

running 12psi boost, hks pod, fmic, full exhaust including dump and afc neo?

should i go for a pump and wat power should i be expecting?? around 180 hey?

anything else that i could upgrade easily to get me more power?

HI,

Guys if your fuel pump is causing you issues, some may be faulty change it. If not leave it.

What I am saying is save your money(or if you can afford it buy it). On the other hand I didnt have money to throw around and went to the dyno with a 'it will make as much power as it wants to attitude'..

stock fuel pump I made 234.5rwkw..and so many others also...this proves that the stock pump is capable? Unless there were different model gtst r33 pumps, which I doubt.

I dont want to mislead anybody, just trying to shed some light..

Fuel is important in the long run, as if there isnt any well you engine will cease to work.

Cheers

my2c

well its obvious a fuel pump and reg increases power but that auto Steg with 160 at the wheels is pretty impressive

plenty of auto stageas in australia with >200 awkw. Same upgrade potential as skylines but you lose an extra 10-20kw through the drivetrain due to the extra weight. They're about 250-300kg heavier than a skyline :P AWD helps to overcome the weight a little bit - especially when you increase the kw.

You can gain an extra ~20kw by removing the front drive shaft, making it RWD, but the reality is that people have done this and found that the car is actually faster in AWD (almost a 1sec difference in 1/4 mile times). Factory RWD-only stageas are a LOT lighter (front diff and ATTESA setup adds about ~200kg!!) however so these would have performance very similar to an equivalent RWD skyline. :(

yeh i am going to go on the dyno and get my afc neo tuned and see how the stock fuel pump handles it, hopefully everything goes all good, if not well i will have to upgrade it.

i will have, afc neo, fill 3" exhaust with dump pipe, air pod, fmic, bc runs 12psi.

what kind of figures do you think i will be expecting? hopeing for 180 or something higher or there abouts.

should be up on the dyno within the next month or so

Paulr33...

time will only tell if it is a timb bomb tune..Can you explain to me why it is a timb bomb?

I know many people change the pumps because of the info they get on these type of topics and some times they would probaly definately not need it. It has been a few weeks of testing the car and it is holding up fine for now. It seems to be suppyling fuel fantasticly as the AFR's when dynoed were fine?

Can someone please post up if they have had there stock pump run of efficency at higher power levels. All the time I hear people claiming that there faulty not that they cannot supply the fuel at certain power levels. My pump is old now at 12years of age, I think this is the cause sometimes. Some last longer then others or quality may vary. There are alot of variables.

Paulr33 I will update you in a couple of months to see if the pump is holding up..

Cheers

before I went onto the dyno I ran NULON INJECTOR CLEANER through the car also as i use to drive around on the bottom of the tank alot which sifts all the gunk from the bottom of the tank into the injectors and is known to clog them up..It may of cleaned the fuel pump also as you put it straight into the tank.

Cliffgtst Use some injector cleaner before hand and maybe run some ethonal fuel before hand as this is also known to clean some gunk laying around in the fuel systems and engine..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I found the same with Subaru’s.  I own and love the SG9 Forester, after that model 2008+, Subaru threw the ugly stick at all their line up and somehow managed to make them look worse with every succeeding year.  lol
    • It's something we all have to consider as time marches on. Also consider lifted rally MX5 conversion at that point.
    • I should be fine for a few more years, whilst I do have arthritis I also exercise and do mobility training every day to keep as fit and healthy as I can, military life, which is the actual cause of most of my joint issues, has set daily regimes, which I weirdly enjoy I also train alot smarter now, not really focusing on lots strength or puffy muscles, I'm more focused on maintaining what I have for my future older self, I actually train as much mobility now as I do exercising Check out this "simple" drill I have been doing daily prior to training now for a while now, this has worked wonders in my all round mobility   
    • I'd say one thing that may make you sell is the same reason the guy with the hard top roof sold his. He got old, and his back was giving him too much grief stopping him getting in and out... Old guy said he was 73! He looked and sounded younger than 73 to me! Or maybe I'm just aligning with old people more...
    • Already looked at a few prior to getting the MX5, really nice car, had all the mod cons, but I wasn't really sold on the new "look" I did miss my 2017 Limited, and I personally prefer the "look" of the older car over the new model, but, when pondering I kept going back looking at MX5's But it was same same for the new ND's, I wasn't sold on the new "look", especially the RF with its weird roof, which only half goes down, like a targa top sort of thing As I stated before, I did look at NC's, but the cars I looked at were PRHT's, but I didn't like their roof line "look" of the PRHT, until I saw the soft top version, (someone on SAU posted a for sale ad for one with a soft top that caught my attention, you can blame them for my choice.....🤣) and.... that old style detachable hard tops were available for them, which keeps the old MX5 more smoother flowing roof line, and the more rounded body style, similar to the NA-NB, to me, the arse end of the ND looks to "modern" Much like how I prefer the NC1 front bar, over the later models How long will I keep this car for is unknown, but currently, there's nothing else out there that "floats my boat" for a small, fun, little "sports car", that I can play with and enjoy looking at and driving But, who knows what the future holds, and going off current new car styling, if I replace it, it will be a older model something something       
×
×
  • Create New...