Why A Naturally-aspirated Skyline?

[smurf80]

I agree this needs to be locked, Thread starter is a tool and it seems posting this garbage to get a rise out of people.

Edited May 28, 2007 by smurf80

[GTAAAH]

I don't think the arguement is NA V Turbo.... It's NA SKYLINE V TURBO SKYLINE... Big difference...

And i'm sorry but people who are saying that stock for stock a gts has more on tap around a course than a gts-t can't drive... It's not so difficult to drop the car back a gear, or kick the clutch a little if you've gone into a corner too slow or braked too much.. Not to mention that the turboes on a stock gts-t spool very low.. Also, i've been in quite a few RB30E powered 31/vl's and the pickup isn't exactly great.. and the top end is nothing amazing.. definitely not the kind of engine i'd choose over a slightly lower capacity turbo'd six...

[DivHunter]

I don't think the arguement is NA V Turbo.... It's NA SKYLINE V TURBO SKYLINE... Big difference...

And i'm sorry but people who are saying that stock for stock a gts has more on tap around a course than a gts-t can't drive... It's not so difficult to drop the car back a gear, or kick the clutch a little if you've gone into a corner too slow or braked too much.. Not to mention that the turboes on a stock gts-t spool very low.. Also, i've been in quite a few RB30E powered 31/vl's and the pickup isn't exactly great.. and the top end is nothing amazing.. definitely not the kind of engine i'd choose over a slightly lower capacity turbo'd six...

Don't bother, they don't get it.

[SKY031]

Lots of requests to lock this thread, looks like the question has been answered many times over, so ....... request granted to please the masses.