Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Re dyno'd my GTR yesterday, totally different power curve :)

Made top power about 6000rpm

166kw's in 4WD & 185kw's in RWD

Graph coming....

check last post

Hey people,

Had my R32 GTR on a Rwd dyno today, it made 176kw's. Not sure about the rpm level, but it made peak power at 101km/h. The only mods so far are a K & N panel filter and a TRUST 80mm cat back exhaust system. Apparently the boost restrictor has been taken off?? bcos it was running a solid 12-13 psi. Is this about right? Anyone roughly know what kinda power increase's a full exhaust system will make.. Any suggestions on next mods.

cheers

Jono

GTR 032

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16675-my-gtr-on-dyno-today/
Share on other sites

I think you're mixing up the torque and power lines Dundan.

Power is the red one, and rises gradually to ~175kw and stays there until redline.

Torque is all over the place. Weirdest torque curve I've ever seen. What's with the dip at the start?!?

In fact the flat power curve is very very weird too...

That's one weird-ass dyno reading right there. Stick with Dyno Dynamics :)

/me writes down "MDXDYNO... Never use".

The dyno guys didn't really say too much about it, get what you pay for I guess... Gonna try a little more reputable dyno next time. The power curve on my GSR was very straight forward to read compared to this one, except that it had bags less power..well not that much :)

Cheers

One weird looking dyno graph!In fact,the power curve looks a lot like the torque curve.I mean, when was last time anyone ever saw power curve dead-flat?Definetly looks like torque.And torque looks very much like the power curve.Except it peaks too early and drops-off too quick to be the power curve.Strange.Could be that the dyno parameters/software were not set-up correctly before the run or something.One weird looking dyno graph.

that is seriously confused. Sure that wasn't made with a spirograph? ...sorry. But it is a weird graph. Use search, and look for 'dyno' - there are may of the guy's dyno sheets on here and you'll probably be able to find a 32 GTR dyno sheet somewhere to compare it to :)

Is that the wheel spinning run? That may explain the apparent power loss. Also that torque figure looks a little unrealistic. 32/33 gtr pull 350-360 Nm at around 4500 rpm stock.

Just remember that power = torque x revs. So as torque drops and revs rise power stays flat.

My guess is wheel spin (and the values are too high). What you've got there is wheels breaking traction at 100kms as the torque ramps up and the correction values on the dyno giving a very high reading.

Cheers

(Professor) BHDave

I'm with Dave, that's the sort of result we get when there is wheelspin. The resistance at the rollers gets to a certain point and then the tyres slip on the rollers. So it always shows the same max power as the wheelspin increases and holds the readings constant. It can be bad enough to affect the power readings, but not bad enough to smoke the joint out.

The torque readings are being affected by being in 3rd gear, that may be the reason why they are higher than usual (in 4th).

I'd suggest another run but in 4th gear and tied down better to the dyno.

Hope that helps

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reading your posts Josh, sometimes I feel like I've gone in a time machine back to the 90's when everyone was doe-eyed and figuring things out for the first time.  I've lost track of how many single turbo GTR's I've seen on track that haven't burnt down lol. Everything has been figured out a long time ago. These things are at the point now where its essentially turn-key to go single turbo. 
    • Among other things yes. Making sure to either use an oil pressure regulator or the right restrictor size for your oil pump/range of oil viscosities you intend to run, making sure you plumb the lines correctly, turbo should be placed such that it siphons properly even when the water pump isn't turning so you don't boil coolant in the turbo after shutdown, oil return should be low resistance and also preferably picking the one that is most likely to return to the pickup as opposed to some other irrelevant part of the pan. It's far from impossible to figure this out but I have seen people really, really struggle and if that's the case it's easier to just take the path of least resistance. To me, bolt-on twin turbos are a fixed cost whereas single turbo is almost unbounded.
    • Latest round of updates on the car. I purchased and installed a SWS clutch slipper to help with 60ft times and got some second-hand good condition 275/40R17 Hoosier DR2 radials. Test and tune in November showed the tyres were an upgrade over my over 15 year old mickey Thompson's and I got a 1.8 second 60ft and pb et of 11.71 but even then, that run wasn't great due to rain and driver error (the event got called off 10 minutes later fast forward to the weekend just gone 25th of Jan and there was finally a break in the weather to let racing happen. The first run the track was slippery and only managed a 12.1@129 Second run the track was better and got a new pb et and mph: 11.54@131   Lith and I then worked out that I installed the previously mentioned clutch slipper incorrectly and its never been working, and I had just been dumping the clutch the entire time, we also noticed it was on street boost and not race boost. So I lined up for a third run with the car turned up in the first two gears, but the passengers side axle objected to clutch dumps and left the chat which stopped my weekend.   so there will be another attempt in the future once I replace the tyres as they rubbed and are stuffed now. but a low 11 should be on the cards.
    • Ceramic coating and heat shielding, you mean?
    • Turbos don't require pulling the motor apart so that's "easier". I would recommend the Nismo R3 turbos instead if you want to do stock twin turbo. It doesn't make as much power as the 2530s but it's only like ~50 whp off the mark and should have better response (ball bearing CHRA, slightly smaller turbo). A local that went with a Garrett G30 and 6boost manifold recently nearly burned his car to the ground after the hood insulator started melting and and burning so if you go single turbo I recommend doing a lot of research and validation work to make sure you don't do the same.
×
×
  • Create New...