Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

in fact i like these brakes so much I bought another set for the other car on the weekend. 356mm set this time, with a minor adjustment to the dogbone adapter we got it to fit under our weds 17" wheels too

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I just wanted to post somewhere in here that I have now had the opportunity to use the "race" pads that Just Jap sell for the G4's. I have standard rear brakes with BEndix Ultimates in there and find that not only is there no bias issues, I have fixed a bias issue that I believe the car has from factory. I was regularly cooking rear rotors and pads before but now it all runs fine. Lap times are down and the car stops amazingly. I was regularly braking far too early due to being used to the standard setup. With the addition of good tyres and these brakes I knocked 3 seconds off my previous pb at Wakie.

Thats awesome. You were quick before from memory, so you are into the 1:07s or something now? Though i have to ask, what tyres? Tyres are worth 2-3 seconds at Wakefield, so be interesting to see you run the same tyres as you used to and see if there is any difference in lap times at all. Thats not to take away from the fact that the car is much easier to stop and nicer to drive.

1:11's on new enough RE55's and 1:08.5 with old 2nd hand slicks. My shocks are totally stuffed so if I can find some money for a rebuild of them I will go and have another crack. I nearly came in my pants every time I did a 1:08 so imagine how excited I'll get if I pull a 1:07.9999999!

So you are 2.5 seconds quicker on old slicks compared to relatively new semi slicks? That goes agaisnt the trend of typical time improvements for tyres. I suspect the RE55s were cactus as i would have thought a 250rwks R34 on RE55s would be quicker then 1:11s? Slap some new suspension in and decent RE55s and i suspect you will match/better then slick times!?!?!??!?!?!

LOL, actually no. Sober at present :) Just getting dumber by the day. :P You did you say "With the addition of good tyres and these brakes I knocked 3 seconds off my previous pb at Wakie"

LOL...sorry, just saying thats huge, but with swaybars in the mix as well it starts to paint a picture that makes more sense :)

Oh damn, maybe I forgot to mention the sway bars.

From my hazy memory I was running mid 1:11's with RE55's, then high 1:11's with sway bars, brakes and streeters, then mid 1:08's with sway bars, brakes and old slicks.

  • 4 months later...

Hi all great read, r33 gtst - anyone had clearance issues with wheels 356mm kit 18" wheels tried spacers still no good might hav to get wheels machined a little, tried two sets of wheels speedy inferno 18x8, and ROH drift R 18x8.

cheers skuzzas

I've run the 365 brakes under 17" rims without spacers, so it is the design of the rims that matter not the diameter.

In particular rims with "dish" just won't clear good brakes

Just re-reading the above, i cant believe how brakes can bag you 3 seconds, especially around a track like Wakefield. I mean think about a car that is 3 seconds slower at the drags and the distance between them when they are travelling over 150km/h. I cant see any brake upgrade allowing you to pull that sort of time difference from simply slowing the car a few meters deeper under brakes

In particular rims with "dish" just won't clear good brakes

The problem with Drift Rs is that they have "cheater dish" - where the end of the spoke curves in before contacting the barrel. It's the only way high offset wheels can get any lip at all.

Roy, I believe the tyres would have had a huge impact on the time.

Brakes to improve your time as long as you use them correctly and get on the gas quicker. Your lap times will slow if you are heavy on the brakes and hard on the acceleration because the distance you are covering at speed is reduced dramatically compared to a proper entry and exit with a constantly increasing throttle.

I agree regarding tyres, but i have simply read too many articles and have fiddled with enough brake setups to confidently say that the difference is on the 4th lap when you simply have too much car for the std brakes and everything is getting toasty hot

The only major improvement i think you see with bigger brakes is consistancy. SO a 3 seconds over a number of laps i can easily believe. Over a single lap, being your best lap of the day.... well i am just still a little sceptical of such claims.

Suspension setup and tyres play a bigger role in stopping distances then the caliper/rotor arrangement. There are many back to back tests that show stopping distance improvements of less then a car length from std equip using good pads and fluid compared to big dollar Brembo/AP/Alcon setups. Where the big setups help is that they operate at lower temps so are more consistant

  • 4 months later...
I've run the 365 brakes under 17" rims without spacers, so it is the design of the rims that matter not the diameter.

In particular rims with "dish" just won't clear good brakes

Any idea if they will be able to be run with 33 gtr wheels + spacers? Or am i better of getting the 330mm g4 set-up? :down:

cheers

Grab the 356mm setup and if your 17's dont fir then get some TE37 or something that have better brake clearance

So your saying go for the 356mm set-up, the 330mm doesn't really add up as an effective upgrade? I was hoping to not upgrade the wheels, everything adds up so violently.. motor, turbo, fuel set-up :D the wallet.

Going to measure the diameter of the wheel today, hopefully that's all Il need a 20-30mm spacer should stop it from hitting the spokes (as it's not a dished rim the spokes are set out more to the outer edge of the wheel), will report my finding

In the grand scheme of things the 330 and 356mm setups are pretty similar in price. And considering you have a big heavy GTR with plenty of grunt i think you are really better served with the 356, especially since there is a range of 17" wheels that will swallow them. Just need to flog off your current wheels to help fund the better 17" wheels.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • One other question, is there a chance that changing the idle speed can lead you down a rabbit hole and is the reason the tuner didn't touch it? Reason I ask is because if that's the reason the tuner avoided it then I probably shouldn't be touching it lol.
    • Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
    • The funniest part I saw, was someone would bitch and moan on FB about something, Andy would be the one to respond, asking for more info, if he could contact them, what the engine setup is, what their config file was, and 95% of the responses were people just going "der! It doesn't work" and Andy going "What doesn't work?" And then going "The firmware!" And they'd go around in circles as no one could ever give information, and Haltech couldn't fault things on the bench, (especially when people wouldn't give any specifics).   Many moons ago, when Andy was back at e420c stage, he reached out to me, and asked me to test different plug and play looms for him (already had an e420c in the car on his V1 PNP loom). And he kept asking me, as I was competent enough to be able to give him some specific feedback on what was/wasn't working, how to replicate the faults etc, and work through things with him. Most people are terrible at answering the questions they're asked, or being able to provide quality feedback other than "it doesn't work".
×
×
  • Create New...