Jump to content
SAU Community

Microtech Dwell Setting.


Recommended Posts

hey fella's this post is directed mainly towards engine tuners or people familiar with microtech lt12. i reccently instaled wasted spark to my car and now i needa adjust the dwell timming, i know what its gota be at, just dont know how to change it correctly and i dont wana stuff it up, ive read over the microtech book and used google cant find what im after, basicaly if someone in the know could help me with a step by step to adjusting it, i.e scroll ref down 3 times or something simlar, or even a picture of the handset screen i needa look for, that would be great, thanks in advance for any help comming my way.. :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey fella's this post is directed mainly towards engine tuners or people familiar with microtech lt12. i reccently instaled wasted spark to my car and now i needa adjust the dwell timming, i know what its gota be at, just dont know how to change it correctly and i dont wana stuff it up, ive read over the microtech book and used google cant find what im after, basicaly if someone in the know could help me with a step by step to adjusting it, i.e scroll ref down 3 times or something simlar, or even a picture of the handset screen i needa look for, that would be great, thanks in advance for any help comming my way.. :blink:

[/quote

Ring Microtech - different setups need different dwells . Do not tou

ck this yourself as you willi grenade the motor first rev if you dont know what your doing . It is like advancing your timing 30deg + if its wrong . Trust me , my mate cost himself $10,000 + trying this himself - it only took 5 seconds to happen . Take it to a dyno expert .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks for the tip mate, my tuner told me what to set it at, he's jst to far away and i dont wana drive it there like this with it the way it is, anyone else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks for the tip mate, my tuner told me what to set it at, he's jst to far away and i dont wana drive it there like this with it the way it is, anyone else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...