Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I spoke to AVO and they said to run hoses from both rocker covers to the catch can. They said that I should block off the vavle on the plenum and plumb the can back to my intake(before the turbo). So they've said the same as you. I'm pretty happy. Thanks.

Out of interest what is the purpose of connecting the rocker cover to the intake plenum via the valve?

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You shouldnt need to block off the line from the plenum to the rocker cover. This is for pcv whilst not on boost - as there is a vacuum drawing the air from the rocker cover. when on boost of course, the plenum is pressurised and then the catch can takes out the oil prior to return to through turbo.

Having said that, cant see that it would hurt redirecting your PCV through a catch can.

I guess it should still be worth while blocking the route through the PCV valve as on Vacuum you could be sucking in crap through your plenum. A small point. However if you dont have an after market ECU (retune required) you will loose your light load tuning and induce stalling etc.

I had an interesting conversation with BOOSTD who has posted info on this subject under the banner of some other conversation (I havent seen it) stating he has done this. The results were better idle and a huge increase in fuel economy. He also was picking up much more shit in his catch can. Quite possible condensation/sludge mix that would normally be sucked into your plenum on initial start up.

My 2 cents

He explained that he put some screws in the PC valve so it wouldnt open. Personally I tried it by using two blanks that are obtainable from most auto shops. This is where I realized it wont idle so set it back to origonal. However next tune I will set it up again. I got mine from Roccas. Of course it doesnt look legal. I have also heard of jamming a ballbearing in the hose large enough not to go in the plenum of course. This will maintain the legal look.

Is your car in? Cant wait to check it out on return from Darwin. I have heard Evan is not the quickest so it might not be ready. However small price for quality.

The hose connects to the PCV valve on the plenum so the vacuum it creates makes airflow through the engine. This is to suck away the harmfull gasses that can build up in the sump and cause acidic residue that contaminates the oil. The PVC valve is a one way valve so it can only flow from your rocker cover to the plemum, when there is pressure in the plenum the valve closes, so the crap can be redirected through the catch can. In this scenario the valve will do its job of cleansing out the harmfull gas but when you are booting it the gas will go through the catch can and not enter the engine. I would do it this way otherwise you are not preventing your oil from being contaminatd. In my opinion this will increase the life of the engine over the long term.

The gasses won't do any harm to the engine when they are being burned under light throttle. The only time the gasses cause lost power and produce pinging is under load. Since the PCV will close then its not an issue.

Where do the harmful gases come from when not on boost? Something I forgot to mention before for the guys with idle problems you may be sucking air through your catch can via PCV when on Vacuum. However these are all only theories and am now interested in persuing this harmful gas problem. So is the whole reason of the PCV to remove harmful gases or does it have other roles. Oh by the way catch cans are the go. Not to be a thread hijacker.

Originally posted by lowlux

VPW mailorder,  there in epping but deliver to your door and yes they come with brackets but there kinda crappy so im making better ones also i had to go buy some hose and some fittings but that cost me like $20,  and the catch can was $90 soooo its all good alot cheap than the cusco ones

Lowlux, it took me awhile to find because searching on "catch can" or "separator" didn't turn anything useful up. But it seems to be the "Aluminium breather tank", with part number VPW-36108. Is this what you have? The price is also $140, not $90 :) At that price (plus freight) I think I might tend towards a Cusco or custom job.

The harmfull gasses come down past the rings as combustion bypoducts and fuel etc, these mix and react with the oil and contaminate it.

It is not for pollution control (even though listed as part of emmission equipement) Having this gas vent to the air is harmfull to the environment so it is burned in the engine. There is NO NEED for a PCV system for the redirction of this gas back into the engine. By simply connecting the rocker cover hoses back to the intake before the turbo the gas emmisions will get sucked back into the engine and the EPA will be happy.

PCV stands for positve crankcase ventilation, ie forced ventilation of crankcase.

I am in the process of drawing up catch can system that won't cause idle probs with a PCV valve and will filter the gas at all times. I will post it when done.

Ok here's a question, not related to any particular setup mentioned here, but just in general. Why, instead of venting the blow-by to the atmosphere, or plumbing in between the afm and the turbo, don't we plumb the gas back into the airbox (for those of us who still have an airbox)? that way the air gets filtered by a nice big filter, and the air still goes through the engine, so no EPA problems?

Is it because the low-oxygen blow by will affect the afm? or is there another reason?

I know this was how my old carbied magna was plumbed from the factory.

any ideas?

Belly_Up

The fact is you can't filter out the used air as it has already been combusted. The filter simply can't absorb it.

To get picky, the gasses have already been measured by the airflow metre so by plumbing back before the AFM it will be measured twice making it run richer. It would also clog up the filter quickly and coat the AFM hot wire in oil, not good.

You will find that the Magna had the hose connected inside the round filter holder. The gasses don't go through the filter they just go straight down the carbie.

Greg the car goes in on wednesday fingers crossed.

DennisRB30, on casual look, it appears that the plenum could draw air from the breather?

Belly_up, the only problem would be the number of filter elements you would go through - and that the AFM might get dirty.

In days of old, cars just had the pcv going into the rocker cover and was vented to atmosphere through the oil filler cap, with ony a vague attempt at filtration. The pcv just stops the crank case from being pressurised by blow by. Without it it would cause all sorts of problems from blowing out dipsticks to possibly blowing seals.

I dont believe it would be essential to have the gasses go through the plenum - it appears more an attempt at emmissions control to me?

Would love to know more about this, because if by blocking off the pcv to the plenum and forcing the gasses though the catch can, it would still comply with emissions criteria. If that means improved economy all the better.

I really cant see a downside to this approach. Anyone?

Nah the magna definately ran the blow by through the filter, but it had bit of a deflector and little bit of foam to semi-filter it, kinda like a mini catch can.

we don't want to filter out the used air, we just want to take any oil etc out of it.

But i think you might be right about it making it run rich, i guess it would just depend on how significant the amount of blow-by actually was.

Dennis your idea while good is not legal because of the filter going to atmo, Browny you've got the right idea except all those hoses running under the bonnet will look terrible.

This idle problem associated with blocking the PCV valve, could it be fixed by adjusting the idle control unit, perhaps we need to let in more air to compensate for the lost air not coming from the PCV valve anymore?

Read all the text I have written, it explains the opperation.

The plenum is supposed to draw air from the breather so the crank case is cleared of harfull fumes by positive crankcase ventilation. But it only does it under light throttle, when you boot it, the PCV closes and the air goes out the filter (or back to the intake depending on how you hook it up, again read all the text)

If you read the text it explains the benefits of having the blowby go out of the filter and it tells you how to hook it up without the filter if your worried about it being legal (but your engine will suck in blowby, but at least it will be cleaned by the catch can)

Not having a PCV won't make gaskets blow etc if there are hoses comeing out of the rocker cover, the pressure just comes out of the hoses. I explained what the PCV system does, its to clear the harfull gasses by displaceing them with clean air.

The whole idea of my system is that the PCV system still opperates on light throttle, but under heavy throttle no fumes go into the engine.

I urge you to read the text I have written with the pic.

Browny, your system does not use positive crankcase ventilation. The gasses have to make there way into the catch can under there own pressure at all times. The PCV valve does nothing but suck in the fumes that have come out under there own pressure. The outcome would be the same if it was not ther at all as it does not replace the fumes with clean air.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's interesting seeing everyone talk about what level of risk they are happy to tolerate.  Building a GTR always has a level of risk, you could be that lucky guy that drops 20k on the engine build alone and still has the thing go pop on the dyno. Life is fun like that.  The way I see it, the thing is a toy to be enjoyed. I'd be happy to turn up the power on stock motor and limit the risk with sensible tuning and engine protection. If it still goes pop, it is what it is. The car isn't a daily driver so it can happily sit while a plan is made to sort it out.  Given this thing will be a street car only, I really feel it's worth the (relatively small if managed well) risk to turn the power up to around 350KW on e85.  I don't think anyone getting into the skyline game now is doing it out of logic. Surely it is a purely emotional decision so I'm not sure how important it is to think about the engine build logically. The heart wants what it wants.  @joshuaho96 little note for Josh, I run my 525 pump flat out all the time and through the factory lines without any issues. (excluding the melting connectors, that's sorted now. we'll pretend it never happened lol)
    • But the Nexus S3 is very expensive and won't be as purpose-built for the application as a separate electronic boost controller :^) More seriously my pet issue here would be that the Walbro 525 running at 100% duty cycle is going to require more FPR than the stock setup can handle. I'm also pretty sure from what I've seen elsewhere you might want to slow down the pump regardless unless you're going to come up with some way of upsizing the fuel lines coming from the fuel tank. Factory 8mm fuel line doesn't actually flow very much if you want to keep pressure drop down between the fuel pump outlet and FPR. If you really want to "keep it simple" I would run only as much pump as you need and source a fuel pump controller to slow down the pump in the vain hope of being able to run stock-style FPRs which are pretty dinky. Or just use the HICAS lines and it should be mostly fine. OP should also really think hard about what profile they'd want out of the turbo. My pet choice here would be the G1 profile rather than anything higher power but YMMV. I already think ~stock turbo lag is pretty bad so I don't want to make it worse. In "gentle canyon cruising" I found that I spent a lot of time around 4-4.5k RPM. I also recommend DIYing labor if you're detail-oriented enough. Costs are high for labor + if you do it yourself you can be your own quality control.
    • GTSBoy is again on the money. My actual advice? Sell the car. (really). For what it's worth as is, you can sidegrade into something much better. If you care about function then this is the actual move. If you want a Skyline to perform, set aside about $100K to do it. This is NOT a typo. You will see right away these are two very different mindsets. Realistically we're talking full restomod for any Skyline still kicking around. Have an honest think about which one you are.. and what you want to do, and how much you want to invest in this (with no return).
    • I promise there will be no chance of replacing the rad support....  It is barely twisted and it's way more likely to just be driven around with a slightly twisty support. As long as the headlight can be bolted in there then no harm no foul lol. The reo may need to be un-bent a little but truth be told if it all somewhat lines up and is hidden when the car is assembled the level of f**ks will be 0.0 
    • this thread delivers, once again Skyline owners, our cars spend more time off the road than on the road  
×
×
  • Create New...