Jump to content
SAU Community

Nissan Skyline R34 25gt

orestes_87
 Share

Recommended Posts

orestes_87 Newbie

orestes_87

Posted
Posted

Hey all, kinda new here and have been looking around at performance vehicles for a while now, and have taken interest in the NISSAN SKYLINE R34 25GT (non turbo, 2 door). Was looking for general information on it. I usually use redbook.com.au for that sort of info but it only has info on the turbo R34's (i dono why, and believe me i looked) i did a search on here but didn't find what i was lookin for really. I'm lookin for fuel consumption ltr/klms, stock power in kw and torque, weight, and other specifics. I've sopken to a few people who use to own a 25gt 34 they claimed to have 150kw, and still use around 500km in a tank (not sure on tank size either) but it doesn't sound quite right to me. any info would be much appreciated. cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167490-nissan-skyline-r34-25gt/
Share on other sites
DECIM8 Grand Master

DECIM8

Posted
Posted

Tank 60L or so .. yet I can never seem to fill mine to 60L ussually fit 50L max before pump turns off..

Skylines - Always eat petrol .. so if your looking for economy by a lancer or excel :banana:

Pretty much exact engine as the GTT just without the turbo .. Kws I have no idea 150rwkws I doubt as a stock GTT puts that out .. maybe 150 at the flywheel tho

Runs the same neo engine as the GTT with all the kewl things .. I think you lose some gauges tho..

hope that helps I own a GTT do dont know much else..

orestes_87 Newbie

orestes_87

Posted
  • Author
Posted

cheers buddy, great help. i know there's no such thing as a fuel efficient performance car, but thought it'd be around 11-12ltr per 100km. spose depends how u drive aswell. yeh i'm not too sure about power but im assuming around 135kw. not too certain about the neo RB25, should do some more research i suppose. thanks

n15m0 Grand Master

n15m0

Posted
Posted

NA 34s are rated at 147kw at the flywheel from factory. GTTs are 206kw at the flywheel from factory. Have seen a stock NA34 pull around 100kw atws on a dyno. Fuel consumption aint that bad and it should have the same tank as a GTT which is 65L.

orestes_87 Newbie

orestes_87

Posted
  • Author
Posted

thanks N15mo, i found quite a lot of info on the non-turb 34's in the for sale section, people claim to get over 500km to a tank but am still uncertain of the tank size, if it is 65L i geuss it isn't that great on economy afterall. 147kw sounds about right then. cheers all.

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
CDA Enthusiast

CDA

Posted
Posted (edited)

lol my gawd, i own a 25gt 4-door tiptronic and i found a site with a full list of spex:

http://theskylinesunderground.hostingzero....r34/r34gt25.htm

i jus got my car recently and i think i get about 450-500 a tank and i do push it quite a bit and also do lots of stop and start driving. this is the shit if you're a p-plater like me lol

p.s. and check my profile ive got some pix of it in the gallery section

Edited by CDA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Shoota_77
      Car Rotisserie

      By Shoota_77 · Posted

      Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • GTSBoy
      Stock rb25det neo questions

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • joshuaho96
      Rb25det Belts Change

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • silviaz
      Rb25det Belts Change

      By silviaz · Posted

      nvm this comment
    • silviaz
      Rb25det Belts Change

      By silviaz · Posted

      I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...