Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

HI GUYS,

i have found a good n cheap GT3040 for $1300 and was wondering how well this will go on a standard RB25 engine. I got stock internals, stock cams, stock plenum however got a powerfc, fmic, big injectors n pump, intake etc. I am aiming at 260rkw which i know ill get but will my internals hold and will i get lag from this turbo?

Is it tooo big for standard RB25, will i stress it, or will i just get lag?

thanks

john

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167495-gt3040-on-a-standard-rb25-yes-or-no/
Share on other sites

compressor is larger the exhaust? what the? are u sure ?

Very common Paul :P

The engine should be right, if the tune is kept SAFE and a little on the conservative side. This should be half decent on a rb25. The smaller ext housing will provide a faster spool up, but will limit peak power. At a later stage, if you thirst more power, you can always upgrade to a .83 ext housing, which is a better match for this turbo.

All the best. Make sure the flange is suited to a rb25 manifold.

Very common Paul :P

The engine should be right, if the tune is kept SAFE and a little on the conservative side. This should be half decent on a rb25. The smaller ext housing will provide a faster spool up, but will limit peak power. At a later stage, if you thirst more power, you can always upgrade to a .83 ext housing, which is a better match for this turbo.

All the best. Make sure the flange is suited to a rb25 manifold.

thanks mate but what u mean the right flange. its a t3 flange however this turbo came off an sr setup. doesnt any t3 exhuast falnge bolt up to the rb25 t3 manifold.

thanks

john

Very common Paul :P

The engine should be right, if the tune is kept SAFE and a little on the conservative side. This should be half decent on a rb25. The smaller ext housing will provide a faster spool up, but will limit peak power. At a later stage, if you thirst more power, you can always upgrade to a .83 ext housing, which is a better match for this turbo.

All the best. Make sure the flange is suited to a rb25 manifold.

^ wat he said!

the only time u will see the exhaust housing bigger then the compressor housing will be on a rotor or a bigger engine eg. V8, truck even ur standard turbo has a smaller compressor housing then ur exhaust housing

being a .63 rear exhaust housing it will provide very fast spool on a 2.5L engine BUT will limit power up high in the rev range but if ur only looking for 260rwkw this turbo wont have a problem giving it to u, this turbo will make alot more power then that i made 276.6rwkw with a standard bottom end with a SR20

the rear exhaust housing has a .86 option so u can always change it at a later date if u want more topend power but the price u pay for more power will be lag

oh im the one selling the turbo by the way :)

Edited by STR8E180

lol the pic gave it away lololol ill make my decision based on wat else i need to install but should be a problem

^ wat he said!

the only time u will see the exhaust housing bigger then the compressor housing will be on a rotor or a bigger engine eg. V8, truck even ur standard turbo has a smaller compressor housing then ur exhaust housing

being a .63 rear exhaust housing it will provide very fast spool on a 2.5L engine BUT will limit power up high in the rev range but if ur only looking for 260rwkw this turbo wont have a problem giving it to u, this turbo will make alot more power then that i made 276.6rwkw with a standard bottom end with a SR20

the rear exhaust housing has a .86 option so u can always change it at a later date if u want more topend power but the price u pay for more power will be lag

oh im the one selling the turbo by the way :P

well i can give u a list of wat ur going to need

because the turbo is external gated ur going to need an external gate

and because u need an external gate to control boost ur only to need a manifold with an outlet to fit an external gate onto

and ur going to need ur intercooler pipe moded to suit the compressor housing outlet, ur also going to need a new intake pipe because the compressor housing inlet is 4inch so ur going to need a new 4inch air filter (K&N fits perfect)

ur also going to need new oil and water lines made up and a new dump pipe

if are u are in sydney i will be able to make up all the new intercooler pipe + intake pipe + dump pipe for u

im a fabricator by the way

A couple of things I'd be concerned about .

1) Personally I'm not a fan of the big 82mm OD compressors on the 60mm turbine .

2) Advertised as a "4 bolt" turbine housing . Make sure its got the conical stand off on the back of it or its not a propper

GT30 turbine housing . Only available in T3 flange .63/.82/1.06 from Garrett , both integral and external wastegate .

No offense but I think its brave to compare turbine and compressor housing A/R ratios because they live in totally different environments . The difference in temperature of the gasses let alone pulsed exhaust gasses make their requirements very different .

Its entirely possible to run quite large divided turbine housings because the whole expansion of the hot exhaust gasses across a pulse divided system means venting into an area of lower pressure and ultimately volume on the way from the exhaust valves to the turbine blades . The single scroll turbine housing forces you to size its A/R ratio to work a bit like a venturi or nozzle to accelerate the gasses into the turbines inducer blades . If you have to do it this way the roads to rapid transients and acceptable boost threshold is to use conservative compressor wheels that need the least turbine energy to get them cracking .

This may make you laugh but Garrett would have been better off doing the GT3082R the other way round compared to a GT3582R ie the GT35's turbine with the GT3076R's compressor making it a GT3576R . That way you get the larger turbine shaft torque to drive the 76mm GT compressors power needs . THEN if you have to pull back on turbine housing A/R at least you get sufficient power from the 68mm vs 60mm turbine .

Funnily enough Garrett do make the GT3576 and GT3576R but its in the larger centre section (the ball bearing version) and I believe its the diesel spec HP turbine rather than the petrol performance spec UHP turbine . A "GT3576R" would be like an upsized real GT3071R ie turbine diametre closer to compressor diametre . The real GT3071R is 60/71mm diametres whe a "GT3576R" would be 68/76mm . One who worked for Garrett Aftermarket US did tell me this combination would be good but there is also going to be a slight turbine innertia issue . I think you could get around this easily enough with well thought out manifolds/turbine housings and as always tuning .

Off the topic , IMO the GT3082R is the wrong way round and tries to drive a 680 Hp capable compressor with a 500 Hp capable turbine . I think people find the things laggy because the turbine can't develop enough shaft power at low engine speed/exhaust gas velocity to supply the power an ~ 62lb/min (air) capable compressor . The real GT3076R's compressor is good for ~ 53-54lb/min and the real GT3071R's ~ 50lbs/min .

I reckon using the .63 A/R turbine housing on a GT3082R merely forces higher exhaust gas velocity into the turbine which my get it going but prematurely chokes up the exhaust side - its the engine that suffers .

Cheers A .

I reckon using the .63 A/R turbine housing on a GT3082R merely forces higher exhaust gas velocity into the turbine which my get it going but prematurely chokes up the exhaust side - its the engine that suffers .

Cheers A .

Which is generally why the GT3082's make bugger all if any more power over the GT3076's UNLESS they are pumped full of 100+ron fuel and or water meth injection.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because all parts that are put into your papers usually are assigned a badging if they did not come with one. So other people can just check that badging to tell if it is the parts your papes outline. But my pipe has NOTHING on it whatsoever. No idea why this even passed as a Mines pipe to begin with. I see this going two ways: -nobody cares and it's a non-issue, but that is unlikely -the pipe will just have to be assigned a bagding, for sake of argument, a Mines logo, and the papers corrected accordingly If it interests you I will post what the actual solution ended up being. All I care about is that it has to sound equal length and nobody can screw me later on because of a pipe being illegal.
    • The fasteners to the pipe are not subject to TÜV I guess, if we really start putting nuts and bolts through technical tests I'm going to hang the people responsible and then myself. Usually on a modern-ish EU normed car, you would just replace the pipe. Because if you start hacking away at it and welding new pieces on the cops will definitely find a reason to tow your car. That is just how it is sadly. On old cars and imports with no clear "standard" stuff like that won't matter too much. Most cops or inspectors probably won't even really know what they are looking at. But there is experts for this stuff even among cops, and some of them know the rules to a T and even have extensive knowledge about many vehicles. For "just a pipe" to be legal it usually is included in a set of parts, like a complete intake kit or a full exhaust. For example my exhaust needs to pass a noise test, meaning they have a standardized test track with a set of instructions and they run the car through there 3x for an average noise value that is 75dB(a) at point x of the test track. If it's above that, fail. For a turbo setup to be put in your papers you have to do dyno runs, emissions testing etc. So quite costly
    • Would this not be the same for the exhaust you've posted up?  If your exhaust volume and emissions are fine, why does the brand of pipe matter? 
    • The issue is more the fact that there is inspectors that deal with japanese cars a lot and they might know what a real Mines pipe looks like. And then they're gonna get antsy and not pass your car. But I'd have to talk to one of them about this, because you know as well as me that it's just a damn pipe and it effectively doesn't do anything. As I need to have my GT2860s and my exhaust setup (and the increase in HP) TÜV'd anyways maybe they can just correct the entry in the papers or assign a badge to the front pipe. I'm no expert either though, will inquire about this.     Thanks for the insight. Not sure if having a custom made pipe is good or not. Will find out in due time I suppose. Would be kind of funny if this was made in Germany though.
    • See this is a really tricky topic as technically the same rules apply to all cars but for cars but there is a difference. If you want to modify a car like the Skyline which never existed here you have a bit more freedom as they do not adhere to EU specs anyway. Any modification you do has to be in dividually checked anyway so as long as one of the inspectors think it's ok and within the TÜV ruleset you can get stuff like a top secret rear diffuser put in your papers. Which frankly would need a shitload of tests and certificates for EU spec cars, like a 2010 BMW M3 for example. But if you DO run these tests and all tests come out ok (safety stuff for the most part) there is no problem running such a part legally. It's just way too expensive to do for a single person on one car. The most touchy parts are emissions related mods, like an exhaust, turbos, air intakes. If it makes noise or alters the carbon emissions it's essentially illegal until you prove it's not. Meaning it doesn't exceed noise limits or have worse carbon emissions. I'd say for hoses if you replace them same same it doesn't matter what material they are or what brand you use. Same for nuts and bolts usually, they won't go and specifically check that your water hoses and some bolts are 100% OEM parts, that is nonsense.
×
×
  • Create New...