Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here are the official numbers...

9 km/l (11.1 l/100km)for 2.5t AWD vs 10 km/l (duhh 10 l/100km) for 2.5 Di AWD.

here is the full list.

post-20696-1263528538_thumb.jpg

Haven't driven a VQ25dd so I don't personally know.

Will check "official" numbers tonight/tomorrow :(

  • 1 month later...

i'm quite heavy on the foot and i seem to get around 450km's out of a tank..

and i am running VERY rich :ninja: (plops quite alot)

once the PowerFC gets installed it should bump that figure up a bit more :P

got my RS Four S down to ~ 10.5L/100kms of 95% highway (to the Hunter Valley), but averages out to around 13.5L/100km around town (air con always on pretty much)

not amazing, but not too bad

EDIT - pretty much 100% stock car

Edited by Stooge007

So these things have a 68L tank? Im getting around 400 per tank, or a bit less depending on how spririted I drive it :)

Also, contemplating a Power FC over an SAFC. Been told SAFC are ok, but not the best to do as it just messes with the true MAF/MAP reading. Take much to get a PFC tuned for economy and WOT power?

Might have to also try this Boost98 :blink:

{edit} just found they also sell a new one 'Premium 100'

Edited by JZZ20
got my RS Four S down to ~ 10.5L/100kms of 95% highway (to the Hunter Valley), but averages out to around 13.5L/100km around town (air con always on pretty much)

not amazing, but not too bad

EDIT - pretty much 100% stock car

forgot to add, running on either Vortex 98 or Optimax

premium 100??? where sells that?

That's what im running until the new injectors come for the e85. I get the same economy on the 100 octane as the BP98 I used to fill with.

United are the only suppliers left I think.

That's what im running until the new injectors come for the e85. I get the same economy on the 100 octane as the BP98 I used to fill with.

United are the only suppliers left I think.

oh ok i havnt noticed. can you feel any sort of performance gain? and is how much more a litre is it on average than bp98 which is what i use

oh ok i havnt noticed. can you feel any sort of performance gain? and is how much more a litre is it on average than bp98 which is what i use

It sells for around the price of BP 98, I run it to stop the ping I was occasionally getting. I am able to bump up the boost a bit more now, if I want.

According to United, the fuel is at least 100, usually 102 octane.

The standard ecu will probably loose economy with it, my mates XR6t did, due to the ethanol content.

Also, contemplating a Power FC over an SAFC. Been told SAFC are ok, but not the best to do as it just messes with the true MAF/MAP reading. Take much to get a PFC tuned for economy and WOT power?

Dont you dare put a SAFC on a 26 unless your really stripped for cash.... Its not hard to find a power fc for that car. Do it once do it right. You;ll find many stag drivers get the safc sitc combo as they have an auto and are restriced to computer changes with out spending big coin :)

E85 would be best, and at 99c bugger the economy. Lucky the M35 has an 80 liter tank. :devil:

Works out about the same anyway.

E85 is 25% cheaper than PULP98 and you use ~20-25% more of it.... but it is much cleaner and allows for a much more aggressive tune :)

Hmmm, well for me it works like this:

More boost = :) = more boost = :huh: = more boost = poor fuel economy :)

I'm still getting a minimum of 13L/100kms driving to work and back (at least 40% of the trip is spent cruising at constant 50 or 60km/h - so not exactly heavy traffic). If I drive it how I like to drive it, its closer to 14L/100km. Not a big difference...and the driving satisfaction outweighs the extra fuel cost IMO. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, that is a helpful description, because that sounds exactly like a bleeding issue in the clutch....these are hard to bleed manually even when the damping loop has been removed. I'd suggest bleeding again....start by filling the master cylinder up and opening the bleed nipple. Come back and check every now and then that the master cylinder is not empty. Let it gravity bleed for a few hours and see if that improves
    • I replaced the whole clutch line with the chase bays braided hose, I think it removes that loop, is it the short hose that comes immediately off the slave or is there a drawing in the manual to find what you’re referring to? It was just re-bled when I upgraded to the nismo slave, old slave worked fine but I thought that might help, didn’t change a thing. It’s like the first half of the pedal is pushing air and then when it finally actuates the master the friction zone is tiny. Makes it practically impossible to launch the car
    • Yep, that was one of the things we learned fast in the past with our MX5. When you drive with the top down, you are effectively standing out in the sun, 100% of the time, and not getting in any shade (because roads aren't shaded generally!). Just like standing out in the middle of a field on a sunny 27C day is a bit of a bad plan, so is sitting in a MX5 without sun protection.
    • I also just ordered some Frankenstein bolts and side mounts to fit a hard top Just in case I do find one, basically so it doesn't need to be fixed to the car with only the front latch.......and then gaffa tape to keep it in place for the RTN journey from wherever I get it
    • If your temps are fine now, you probably won't have any issues with where your vents are as they don't look right up at the windscreens high pressure area, so any differences when giving it the beans for extended happy laps would be minimal, but, they should vent heaps when stuck in traffic  Much like how that reverse cowl on my SS let "visible" heat out when stationary, but, because it was basically at the windscreen my coolant temps on the Hwy actually raised because air was being fed into it at speed (110kph), to only come back down to around 90° when I got off the Hwy And your 100% correct about the NC currently not needing vents, but, if I was to add a turbo, and a oil cooler and intercooler in front of the condenserand radiator, and then take it to the track???? It is apparently a recommend requirement if I don't want to worry about coolant or oil temp issues, but, any of the above are possible scenarios, over time As it sits now, with the triple pass radiator and stock air conditioning system, I have absolutely no issues with either temps or air conditioning efficiency, I've been basically daily driving thie car for the last month, both on the Hwy, and peak hour, bumper to bumper traffic, but, that's pretty much expected from basically a standard engine  Talking about no issues daily driving, it was 39° the other day and I was sitting in bumper to bumper traffic on the M5 and then M7, with the top down, and with the air conditioning blowing nice cold air on my feet, balls, and face, well, there was one issue, my head and arms got pretty sun burnt Note to self: leave a hat and sunscreen in the car for such days 🤣
×
×
  • Create New...