Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Been doing a bit of light load/ highway tuning of my 260RS. Leaned it out a fair bit. Last tank was 12L/100km (half highway, half around town). I'm a bit disappointed to be honest. I reckon it can do better...

thats pretty bloody good!

i have put mine back to stock ECU, stock boost - and curious to see how it behaves. did new plugs and cleaned AFM meter last week, and trying to keep it off boost as much as i can.

a point of interest is my recent dyno tuning showed the stock fuel map really loads fuel in between 2500 and 2500rpm, which is commonly where i shift - so try short shifting it to keep it out of that area (for RS4S owners).

what annoys me though is the way the fuel gauge barely moves for the first 100km's of the tank, then drops rapidly - to 3/4 - then it takes about 350km to get to half - and then the last half a tank just EVAPORATES over the next 100km's! it's quite deceiving! just when you think you're doing ok out of this tank, BOOM, it laughs in your face!

thats pretty bloody good!

i have put mine back to stock ECU, stock boost - and curious to see how it behaves. did new plugs and cleaned AFM meter last week, and trying to keep it off boost as much as i can.

a point of interest is my recent dyno tuning showed the stock fuel map really loads fuel in between 2500 and 2500rpm, which is commonly where i shift - so try short shifting it to keep it out of that area (for RS4S owners).

what annoys me though is the way the fuel gauge barely moves for the first 100km's of the tank, then drops rapidly - to 3/4 - then it takes about 350km to get to half - and then the last half a tank just EVAPORATES over the next 100km's! it's quite deceiving! just when you think you're doing ok out of this tank, BOOM, it laughs in your face!

thats usually a problem with the fuel "leveler" thingy in the tank.. another one of the guys told me that when i run ethanol it should actually fix this issue(mine was doing it to) so as im on e85, it seems to have cleaned the contact part on the leveler... now mine doesnt play tricks any more.. lol

After driving to a rally on the weekend, I topped up the tank so I'm now running about half BP Ultimate, and about half United 98 Premium (which was giving rubbish economy). Driven like a granny 90% of the time, so far 8.3km/L, looks to be 600+ km per tank. Amazing what staying off boost can do for economy!

Just for comparison my temporary vehicle, a 1994 Toyota Camry 3L V6 is doing 11.4 L per 100km around town (and of course it doesn't have a turbo). I was getting 12 - 15L per 100 from my C34 and have been warned it will get worse with the RB30!

  • 3 months later...

Just managed to see a big improvement in fuel economy with the install of the shift kit.

New best is a 9.3L/100km from Goulburn to West Ryde. This was sitting on an average 116km/h on the freeway.

Also got 10.3L/100km on a Canberra - Jindabyne (2 trips to Perisher) - Goulburn trip.

Very happy with this.

Just managed to see a big improvement in fuel economy with the install of the shift kit.

New best is a 9.3L/100km from Goulburn to West Ryde. This was sitting on an average 116km/h on the freeway.

Also got 10.3L/100km on a Canberra - Jindabyne (2 trips to Perisher) - Goulburn trip.

Very happy with this.

Well that's a surprising benefit!

  • 4 weeks later...

Hey All

One of my first posts since I took delivery of my C34 RS4S. Its a great car and goes surprisingly well. Its such a sleeper, its great! :)

Thought it would be interesting to post my first two fuel consumption figures as my car is absolutely stock standard. Not a single mod except a turbo timer.

Both figures are mixed hiway and city driving plus its a new car for me so I have been giving it a good squirt in between.

First 58L Caltex 98 to 498kms = 11.6 L/100km

Second 55L Caltex 98 to 510 = 10.8L/100km

I imagine if I was going easy and not getting on boost much it would drop to 9L/100 easy.

I'm pretty happy with that as just about any car of a similar size (commodore wagon, camry, liberty) will use the same or more. Only difference is when the RB lights up all the others will be in the rear view mirror! :)

Cheers!

just got 12.5ish from my last tank+$50 worth (about 720kms from $130 fuel) and thats running 95ron and semi highway (actually delivering pizzas lol, lots of 60kms cruising and minimal stopping till you get near ppls houses)

i think im going to get a wideband and a simple piggy back so i can lean out my cruise and light load a bit more (seeing as im pretty stock)

if only i could justify a nistune at the moment :/

I filled my tank and got about 220ks out of it before the fuel light came on...

I wonder if that could be related to my plugs fouling so badly the car literally would not start?

Me thinks that's not necessarily a good indication of a Stag's fuel consumption :)

I filled my tank and got about 220ks out of it before the fuel light came on...

I wonder if that could be related to my plugs fouling so badly the car literally would not start?

Me thinks that's not necessarily a good indication of a Stag's fuel consumption :)

definitely something wrong, check for boost leaks and go from there

o2 sensor will cause bad fuel consumption but not that bad

could also be leaking injectors or even bigger injectors (jap fitted) that just run with the stock ecu (but i doubt this)

One of my first posts since I took delivery of my C34 RS4S. Its a great car and goes surprisingly well. Its such a sleeper, its great! :)

Thought it would be interesting to post my first two fuel consumption figures as my car is absolutely stock standard. Not a single mod except a turbo timer.

Both figures are mixed hiway and city driving plus its a new car for me so I have been giving it a good squirt in between.

First 58L Caltex 98 to 498kms = 11.6 L/100km

Second 55L Caltex 98 to 510 = 10.8L/100km

I have averaged somewhere between those two in my rs4s for the last 4 tanks.

Keep boost guage in the neg, driving these things slow is freaking hard though....

Wow, nice effort Dasic1.

Compared economy before and after my tune.

11.1km/L getting there on the freeway/highway and 12.4km/L getting home.

All up 260kms travel + nearly 4 hours on the dyno and used just over 1/3 of a tank.

Just filled up my second tank of BP 98 in my 'new' C34 s2 RS4V, 11.6L / 100km.

Pretty happy with that, mostly freeway driving but with some acceleration and start stop.

Fuel consumption was the last thing that I was anxious about, but it seems to be not much worse than my HR31 (10.9-11.3 on my typical commute).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Meh, I think we're well into a new era of 90s JDM car. The days when spare engines and parts were cheap and plentiful are long gone. Therefore the YOLO approach is now massively difficult to justify, use and maintain. One should start to ponder whether an 800HP build is really justified, using stock parts. My thoughts? If you like/love the car and want to keep it and don't want to ruin yet another one, then be discrete about how much you ask from the stock parts. A 5 or 600 HP build is still a very fast car. If you want to go silly, have to have the 1000HP territory, then just drop all your cash, buy billet everything (or PRP cast block, etc etc) and use a bigger/more modern gearbag, and put a massive retrofit diff and axles into it. If you ruin any of those things then you're either ham fisted and deserve it, or you're pushing waaaay too far for the stock stuff anyway. The (presumably) young guys who are buying 30-35 year old busted arse Jap refugees and thinking they can live the life that was lived by others 20 years ago are deluded. Expectations need to be adjusted somewhat.
    • Just don’t be silly enough to think it’ll never happen either 
    • I take it that you bought the centre to suit the GTR axles? As in there was a plan, not just somehow lucky that it worked? It all looks excellent, by the way.
    • New engine block time. Up to you whether you want to keep going down this road with this project. Unfortunately a lot of these cars are like this. The road to getting these cars into decent shape is long and not fun for reasons that you're discovering. 
    • Essay time. First things first, an RB running stock turbo and boost levels shouldn't get so bad as to stall from reversion if the recirc valve has been deleted. Should get a little fluffy and annoying, but in my experience, not so bad as to stall. Of course, every car is a bit different, so it remains possible that stalling will happen. So, running with no recirc valve is somewhat of an option, for otherwise stock stuff. Atmo BOVs cause all sorts of shit, even on an otherwise stock setup. Only gets worse the higher the boost and the bigger the turbo. At that point you really need to go for a different ECU and no AFM. Rebuilding the stock recirc valve configuration is not hard. You just need a stock or aftermarket BOV with the appropriate adapter for the 2 bolt flange on the back of the J pipe, and to get/make an appropriate ~1" pipe to get the air back to the turbo inlet, and to possibly modify the inlet (if it is not stock) to take the recirc pipe back in. Not hard. Just takes some cutting and welding. Putting an R35 type AFM into the car anywhere is not as simple as just buying the AFM and throwing it in. You will also need to buy the appropriate boss that will then need to be welded onto the pipe where you're installing it. You can clearly see why by looking at the photo posted above. They are not a "simple" swap for a stocker. You can't put on in place of the stock AFM. You can put one in place of the stock AFM, if you get the mounting boss and weld it to some pipe and otherwise make that pipe piece work like the stock AFM housing. Or you can buy such an adapter, either complete with the 4 bolt flange for the air box, or without, for varying degrees of work needed to then make it fit your stock airbox or some pod filter or whatever you have going on. Oh, and the R35 AFM is not plug and play. The wiring is different, but changing that is trivial. The plug is also different so you either end up repinning the original wires onto the new plug, or you just use a short adapter. If you weld a boss to the cold side pipe, the cold side pipe really wants to be 3", otherwise the scaling on the meter can get a bit weird, but whatever the pipe size, it's not as easy as just using the (fully documented in the Nistune doco) simple method for choosing R35 AFM in X" pipe size in the software, because the scaling will already be a bit different. Anyway, all of this has been comprehensively worked through on the Nistune forums, so there is full knowledge available. I would use a Link/Haltech before I would bother putting an AFM into a cold side pipe. That's a lot of effort for a bodge. Nistune is great, can work well even at fairly high power levels, but you are stuck with the limitations of it being the stock ECU, which includes needing to use an AFM, which is not always convenient for every set of modifications. You have to have a think about what you already have, what you want to have, and decide early if you'd be better off jumping ship to an aftermarket ECU. This so you don't waste time and money doing things 2 or 3 times. Never heard of ECUmaster. Sounds like a backyard operation. If there are good tuners for it where you are, and it is a solid product, then it will be fine. We're only talking about an R engine here. Back in the day they all ran on crude nasty early 90s ECUs and they were fine. You don't need a rocket surgeon's ECU to run one.
×
×
  • Create New...