Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive just built a sub box for my R34 today and thought i'd share the design. I wanted a couple of things out of this box:

- be a suitable volume for a pair of JL Audio 10W0's

- fit snugly enough in the boot so that it was rigidly in place without tying down or bolting in

- removable

- utilise the awkward boot shape effectively

- not require any modification to the boot area

I measured the boot and came up with the following dimensions:

post-28052-1178956578_thumb.jpg

H1 = 190mm = the distance from the floor carpet to the little rise on the mid shelf on the right hand side

H2 = 210mm = the distance from the rise on the right to the underneath of the wiper motor cover

W = 700mm = the distance between the top of the left strut tower and the big rise on the right of the mid shelf

So the box needs to look something like this (hidden detail not shown):

post-28052-1178956772_thumb.png

D = 350mm = arbitrarily chosen to give the desired box volume.

I made a cardboard mock-up to test the fit:

post-28052-1178956806_thumb.jpg

And proceeded to make the box with those dimensions:

post-28052-1178956926_thumb.jpg

post-28052-1178956951_thumb.jpg

post-28052-1178956976_thumb.jpg

The box is ~60ltrs internal, which is just enough volume for those 2 subs in a sealed enclosure. To be sure i didn't lose any volume, i mounted the drivers inverted and stuffed the box with pillow-fill. The amp filled the space on the right side and the fire extinguisher will fit on the left.

If you want to make the same from 16mm MDF, the piece dimensions I used are:

Sides - 350mm(D) x 400mm (H) with a chunk taken out on the bottom/back of 140(D) x 190(H)

Top - 668(W) x 350(D)

Front - 668(W) x 368(D)

Bottom1 - 668(W) x 140(D)

Bottom2 - 668(W) x 210(D)

Back1 - 668(W) x 178(H)

Back2 - 668(W) x 190(H)

When measuring pieces for a box this shape, don't forget:

a) take into account the width of the MDF! (hence the strange piece measurements)

b) make sure the pieces that create the concave back overlap on the inside, so there's solid wood-to-wood on that join.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/168399-sub-box-design-for-an-r34-boot/
Share on other sites

Commendable effort, I like the way you shaped it into a L shape to use the most amount of space possible. Does the rear speaker magnets get in your way at all?

the rear speakers are tucked up higher than the wiper motor, so they're not a problem....not that they actually DO anything with a bloody baby seat anchor through their cones!

would look awesome if you made a board of mdf to cover the wheel wheel bits and covered it in carpet of vynal .. then will look customish :)

nice deign btw.. I installed a amp rack in the same design .. Im trying to do a wheel well sub enclosure .. shit im bad at fibreglass

Dsc00545.jpg

Edited by DECIM8

question for decim8.

seeing as you have a alpine and a fusion amp. I'm guessing the alpine rins the front/rears, the fusion nv class the subs.

Have you noticed a large turn on bang through the subs every time the system is powered up?

would look awesome if you made a board of mdf to cover the wheel wheel bits and covered it in carpet of vynal .. then will look customish :)

the wheel bits? You mean the floor over the spare tyre? There is already the standard floor of carpeted chipboard over the tyre, which is neat enough.

PS: i'm a function-over-form man myself, so anything that's not related to the function of the speakers prolly wont be added.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • He's right ~ there is no 'magic' with stuff like this ... it is more likely that in the process of looking for the short, the loom/wire 'incidentally' got moved in the process, thus removing the short ~ now, that maybe a wire (in a loom) rubbing against the edge of some grounded metal, that's worn through the insulation, causing the (now intermittent) short to ground. If one wire in a loom has been damaged in this fashion, it's reasonable to presume that other wires beside it may have also be damaged, and now exposed...you can bet the green crusty copper corrosion will start... ...that'd be a pisser, Murphy's Law steps right in as GTS observes...but worse, something like that is easier to find when shorted...ie; unplug bulb and fuse, and put multimeter in continuity mode so you get constant beep, and carefully poke about hoping to find if some movemet of the harness stop the beeping.... ...it's still all a bit Arnie tho' ..It'll be back... 馃槂
    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
    • Ah, I thought he'd wired it to one of the spare ECU inputs! Too long ago since I read that post, ha ha. I've been arguing with radiators, harmonic balancers, alternators and rust since reading it.
    • Correct. The ECU cannot read oil temp. (Well, I think it probably can in some situations. I did have the thought of potentially repinning the ECU when I was doing oil pressure). I am using this into the MPVI dongle, so that the MPVI dongle can read oil temperature. It is attached to a VDO gauge which is obviously calibrated to whatever curve the sender actually is using. This would be easy if I could setup a table of voltage to temperature like many sensors, but it appears I cannot do this and can only setup the transform rule which appears to be Input (voltage) x Multiplier, and add an offset. This to me means it MUST be linear. So it may be a complete waste of time wiring this into the ECU. The idea was that the MPVI3 has standalone logging. I wanted to use this instead of a laptop with serial cable (for wideband) for long datalogs. Given the wideband also has electric interference, I may never trust this either in a world where the serial wideband and the analog output wideband do not agree. Last time I did a trace I could see the two wideband traces follow each other, but one was a little leaner than the other. I plan on playing with voltage offsets and actually driving the thing to see how close they correlate. If they never correlate... then, well, maybe I'll never use either. Ideally I'd like to have the Analog wideband read ever so slightly leaner than the serial one, because the serial one is 'correct'. Tuning the car to be ever so slightly too-rich would be the aim. Not needing to have a laptop flying around in the footwell connected with cables is... an advantage. About the only one from the forced upgrade to MPVI3.
    • Hopefully not, since he knows the fuses work ha ha ha
  • Create New...