Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Talk about wanting to lose your lisence. Any one of those cars behind him could have been an undercover police car (or a highway patrol car for that matter, you couldn't see very well through the smoke).

I reckon that if I did something like that, it would definitely be my luck that a police car would be there. I guess he has a higher opinion of his luck than I.

lol at the 'fully sickness' of it all

That was pretty awesome,

But how does he have so much guts haha!

I can't even push my car a little bit on the road now

without being paranoid of a highway patrol sitting somewhere

Maybe because twice in one week i got done :sleep:

Defiently a lack of care, or.. i dunno what else too rip a fullstand still

during the day with traffic haha

in regards to the video.. "drifting was never intended for amateur hoons like these" - today tonight

thats shit doesnt look that amatuer to me.

its reckless and stupid i admit. but Today Tonight and ACA got no idea...

I was going to say that footage must be 5 years old and from japan!

police are trying to locate where in the country it was done rofl

"he doesnt look like hes the boss of that car" hahah omg is that because u have no idea what ur talking about mr "driving instructor"

Edited by 2630GTS
If the rest of you don't do anything wrong what have you got to be worried about?

Because the cops don't pull you over only if you've done something wrong. They pull you over if they think you've done something wrong, or might have, or are likely to.

And on what evidence do they base their profiling.......?

Once again if you've done nothing wrong whats the problem?

You can just feel smug when the policeman has to let you go cos he can't book you for anything.

You don't like it change cars.

I wanna see this clip can someone post the link again.. last one was taken off you tube.. probably by the cops.... i wanna see this supposed R30 in there..

Plus if you get caught doing something stupid on the road you're the dumb ass for getting caught... Do you home work kids

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...