Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have always wondered how much power my engine is actually producing after it made 250rwkw on the dyno.

A factory standard GTT with 206kw at the engine usually makes 145-150kw at the wheels.

If everything else stays constant: tyres, wheels, drivetrain, dyno setting, temperature and etc.

How much would the same car produce at the engine with 250rwkw? In other words: How much is 250rwkw in engine kw?

Do you add the 56kw drivetrain loss (as from 206kw - 150rwkw = 56kw) which give you 306kw at the engine?

or do you calculate in percentage power loss (206 divide by 150 = 1.37), then you times 250rwkw by 1.37 which give you 343kw at the engine?

Applying whichever the correct method, what is 300rwkw equals at the engine? and 330rwkw?

I understand that unless you put the engine on a engine dyno you can't get a definite power figure at the fly. But whats the general rule of thumb method to calculate engine kw from power at wheels?

Thanks

Edited by BaysideBlue
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/169392-how-much-is-250rwkw-in-engine-kw/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

it stays about the same as long as the drive train hasnt changed. but if a car is putting down 250rwkw, then your looking at almost 320kw at the flywheel.

could be less than 320 as with 250rwkw, u would have a new clutch/pressure plate and i would assume pump would be diff too. but you could expect close to 320 at teh fly.

What have you been smoking? a 1kw loss through your drive train? Your dreaming mate. You will be looking at a significant amount to be lost through your drive train by the time power has been transfered through your gearbox, diff ect. What do you think these things dont absorb power?

If a car makes 250RWKW legitimately at the back wheels, you're looking at probably 251RWKW at the engine.

Drivetrains don't soak up much power at all.

you're looking at probably 251RWKW at the engine.

Drivetrains don't soak up much power at all.

what are you talking about? 251RWKW means 251kw at the rear wheels. you don't normally say 251 rear wheel kw at the engine, do you?

percentage loss

Are you saying that for example on a standard gts-t that is looking at a 50rwkw power loss which is close to 25% loss. That on a 1000kw car you are looking at a 25% loss also resulting in a 250rwkw loss through the driveline? Why would it absorb more power the more power you make?

Edited by fEkuaR

Definately less than percentage loss, but definately more than no increase. Just think, losses due to oil drag in g/box & diff will be the same, but frictional losses will increase proportionally. The only way to know for sure is to pout it on a engine dyno and then a chassis dyno. I would say 250RWKW=about 320FWKW, and 300 RWKW=about 380FWKW

percentage loss

Simply the dumbest statement in this thread.

A given drive train will convert (not absorb, not remove, not hide) the same amount of hp/kW regardless of the engine power. Some of this energy is converted into noise but most of it is turned into heat energy and dissipated through the drive train components including everything from the flywheel to the tyres.

To say that a drive train will somehow magically absorb triple what it does from the factory just because the engine horsepower increases by that amount is laughable. Imagine 50kW of heat coming off of your drive train in total and then imagine what 150kW of energy would do to those components. Ever stood next to a 2kW heater?

R33Gods calc is what I would expect.

--

Clint32 many moons ago had his rb25 on an engine dyno. Made 580hp

On a DD Dyno it made 338rwkw. Thats close to 95rwkw drivetrain loss.

I believe as power output increases the amount of power absorbed by the drive train is also increased *SLIGHTLY*.

As more load is placed upon gears and bearings more friction occurs. This has to equate to an increase in drivetrain loss.

The old LS1 V8 manual commodore for example... GTS ~300kw at the fly = 225rwkw,

The run of the mill SS's back then... 225kw at the fly = ~165rwkw.

All approx values as dyno's can vary 5-10rwkw depending on how its strapped down, air temp etc etc.

I dont see anything in the link that convertes rwkw into engine kw.

Btw to say "just plus 30 percent on top of what kw you made at the wheels" is too general. maybe true up to a certain power level. but would result in big discrepancy say for between a car with 100rwkw and a car with 400rwkw.

At light throttle cruising along.... Your motor may be making 30kw at the fly.

IF the drivetrain loss were a fixed value you'd have to drive around with half throttle everywhere. :P

So a percentage it is. Rough enough is good enough :(

Its most likely a fixed value + percentage to take in to account increased friction and load upon bearings/gears. BUT too difficult to determine. :)

250rWkW = 325rw @ engine = 250 * 1.3 = engine power

kw @ engine is same as hp @ wheels

300rwkw = 390rwhp or 390kw @ engine

330rwkw = 430rwhp or 430kw @ engine

this would be a more realistic percentage loss through the drive train

and may god blow up all over reading dynos

ps these are rough calculations, if you want exact get it on a dyno

Edited by R32 Driver

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From the pictures I have when doing the job the flywheel is the same diameter, I don't think they're playing weird tricks like putting weights at the outer diameter to increase flywheel inertia or anything like that. The OEM flywheel is definitely heavier, but it's not a huge difference. Quoted weight savings of the clutch is 2 kg so I can't imagine the flywheel being lighter than ~7 kg. Kind of regret not weighing it before the clutch went into the car but as far as driveability goes I have no complaints.
    • HKS trigger kit should be very easy to integrate with a Link. It's a 36-2 crank trigger. Hard part is finding the motivation to take off the timing belt and everything on the front of the engine to install it. You also need to cut out a hole in the oil pump housing so the sensor can read the trigger wheel. Changing out the cam sensor for a 24 tooth setup is probably good enough but as others have mentioned depending on what underlying assumptions are changed it becomes more of a problem. Reading the crank state off of the cam is an abstraction that works in the general case, but if you have an edge case it makes less and less sense. There is a GTX2860 gen 2 that can take a compact 5 bolt housing so it's direct bolt on but I'm not 100% sure of what's involved. Peak compressor efficiency drops off a bit on these turbos vs -5s, 77% vs 73% but you get way, way wider region of operation. The -5s have a really strange surge line in their compressor map that is all over the place. If you think the hot side on the -5s aren't open enough you can try the Tomei T550B turbos which a local tuner seems to be happy with:
    • i need a complete tail light for my R33 GTR if you have please let me know.
    • I need a great maintenance workshop around Idaho, if you know one please let me know..
    • Hello friends, i have a good friend in Canada that looking for a good condition 1993 GTR around him please if one or know someone around you that is willing to let it go please let me know so that i can inform him.....Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...