Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if its a justjap or one of those generic brands of front mounts that go for about 350 itll fit.

those front mount kits fit the 32/33/34 pretty much all the same way.

ive got a 33 kit on my 32 onli thing is u gotta trim a bit of the pipe that goes back to the inlet manifold as it comes too far foward and hits the radiator shroud.

My just jap 33 kit fits mine, but I wouldn't do it again.

The intercooler had to go on an angle (over exagerated, but the angle I mean, is if you hold it flat, you push one the left side towards the rear of the car, and the right side towards the front of the car. It also had to be moutned on an ablge the other direction too, but that's no big deal.

After that was done (and the front bar/the reinforcement bar was chopped, it only JUST fit (it was a JUST Jap kit...haha) and the pipe/tanks don't line up, I occcasionally blow a pipe cause of it....could be fixed with a 45 degree silcone, but that costs $100 so it's not gonna happen.

What I had to do;

- Cut hole in wall near right wheel

- Cut re-enforcement bar

- cut front bar to get the cooler to fit (centre support, side supports + shortened the depth so it would mount)

- cut the fan so it would fit

I think that was all

SOOOOOOOOOOO, short story long - if you are buying new, get the 32 kit, if its second hand and an awesome price, it will fit.... just not line up as well as the 32 kit.

Edited by eXc

is it 100% really a 32 kit? cause I did that too. I said specifically, it is a 32 kit, not a 33? and they said yes. I get it, and it had 33kit on it, so i rang them "oh no...it just comes in that box...its definartly a 32 kit" then i looked at it all mounted everything and was like, there is no way its a 32 kit, call them back and they said "oh...well it's a 33 kit, but you're the first person to tell us it doesnt line up properly...we always sell the 33 kits to 32 guys.....if you want we can get you a 32 one, but it will take 6 weeks or something.."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...