Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  Risking said:
so did you have a whole core and wheels purchased?? then the housings machined or was the turbo built from parts??

I gave them a RB turbo and they had the VG30 out of a Nissan Cima.They chucked the cartridge and wheels and bought a Garrett cartridge with the wheels and shaft balanced and assembled in it.Then both the RB and 0P6 housings were machined to suit.Turbo charger was then assembled.

how did you come to that conclusion??

The numbers provided have no reference to the actual wheels being used in the turbo only the core.

Unless they purchased an entire core with matching wheels it wont be a 3076.

I dont think the Op6 housing will actually take that size exhaust wheel come to think of it.

Without removing the housings and measuring it up and working out the trims or talking to the builders its not possible to reference any numbers besides the core numbers.

  The Mafia said:
ok its a

GT3076R 700177-5017 xxx xxx 54.97 comp wheel 52 trim xxx 54.98 turbine 84 trim

Interesting

I dont think it will flow quite like yours tho :domokun:

I'm not going to argue the toss.

He said it was NEW cartridge, and supplied the CHRA number off the ID tag. No suggestion of interference or modification, just a new cartridge installed between Nissan housings.

That -0017 tag equates to a 52T T04S compressor mated with an 84T 60mm turbine. That data comes off a spreadsheet sourced directly from Honeywell. Unless there was some big quality control problem, it's unlikely that Garrett got it wrong.

Given the tag number, that's what I would say is in there.

HOWEVER, those who disagree, can. At this stage all that matters is probably giving the thing a run and seeing what it does. :domokun:

Edited by Dale FZ1
  Dale FZ1 said:
I'm not going to argue the toss.

He said it was NEW cartridge, and supplied the CHRA number off the ID tag. No suggestion of interference or modification, just a new cartridge installed between Nissan housings.

That -0017 tag equates to a 52T T04S compressor mated with an 84T 60mm turbine. That data comes off a spreadsheet sourced directly from Honeywell. Unless there was some big quality control problem, it's unlikely that Garrett got it wrong.

Given the tag number, that's what I would say is in there.

HOWEVER, those who disagree, can. At this stage all that matters is probably giving the thing a run and seeing what it does. :P

Once again Dale you are a wealth of turbo knowledge.Im off to Tassie tomorrow but will be getting the turbo fitted not long after i get back,cant wait. :domokun:

Oh and to my original question what would the turbo be compared with then??

I have no claims to fame, but here's a couple of suggestions:

1. The OE comp housing may strangle the potential flow capacity of the impeller. Physical size difference between this and the .70 A/R housing Garrett normally mounts up to that impeller suggests that the mass-air flow will be reduced. By how much is a guess but that side should (guessing) be able to support 240-250rwkW - maybe slightly more. I'd reckon with a .70, the compressor would be good for 280-290.

2. The OE turbine housing normally mates up to a MUCH smaller rotor. This one MAY present an excessive restriction at higher flows, leading to tuning issues to control knock if you wanted to run big boost. Still, if it was machined correctly and profiled to match up to the rotor, it may be quite ok. I'd guess this one is also likely to run out somewhere around the 240-250kW mark.

Overall? A bit slow to come on, pretty big mid range hit but top end petering out by comparison. Again, a guess only.

Keep us informed how it goes.

EDIT: I don't think it would be directly comparable to any off the shelf item, given the specs (and assuming they are correct of course).

EDIT 2: While you have the turbo off the manifold, get someone to drill and tap a suitable location near the collector to take a nipple/bung. With VERY LITTLE mucking around you could run a temporary pressure gauge and monitor what sort of backpressure this turbine actually created. You may have seen some other discussion that focused on that issue at length. On consideration, that is what I will be doing if I remove my turbo again. Low cost, and better understanding of what is going on. :domokun:

Edited by Dale FZ1

Adrian

Do you think this is similar to what I have in my R33 (i was the one that sold you the injectors).

I have still been to busy to get the actual specs on the turbo I got. All i know is that it runs nicely and I dont get any boost spiking.

Hi Trooper , its been a while hasn't it .

I tracked down your mate at Chippingnorton and he did did tell me the cartridge number in yours but thats about a thousand bits of paper ago . I remember he said they pressed a collar into your exhaust housing and machined it to suit the turbine which is a novel way to go about it .

The details escape me but at the time I thought it was not the way I'd go about it - something about the turbine being a little small for the compressor but its hard to be sure .

Those injectors are still in their boxes and will stay that way untill I get my hands on a Datalogit .

Cheers A .

  discopotato03 said:
Hi Trooper , its been a while hasn't it .

I tracked down your mate at Chippingnorton and he did did tell me the cartridge number in yours but thats about a thousand bits of paper ago . I remember he said they pressed a collar into your exhaust housing and machined it to suit the turbine which is a novel way to go about it .

The details escape me but at the time I thought it was not the way I'd go about it - something about the turbine being a little small for the compressor but its hard to be sure .

Those injectors are still in their boxes and will stay that way untill I get my hands on a Datalogit .

Cheers A .

G'day Adrian

I think soon all the specs will be 'lost' no one will remember what was put in - I dont really mind what is in there, as long as it works, its more responsive than the stock one and very streetable which is what I was after, still a shame they are not going ahead with the project.

I fried my PFC so just got that repaired at access :)

I am starting to get misfire problems, hoping its just a matter of gapping the plugs down.

Ready to upgrade injectors I think (again), I really want to change them but my tuner doesnt and he is the one with the knowledge. Making 260rwkw on stock injectors, stock FPR etc on 1.1 bar

Not sure what to change next. Injectors, Cams, Splitfires come to mind - but I just spent a lot of time having things tuned for economy so I dont really want to touch things for a while.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I started with the above in my head too, and I might be reading / thinking about what they want wrong, which is why I complicated it a bit further. Purpose I'm seeing is for the corner indicator to be on with headlights, and then if the indicator turns on it can still flash. The relay part above I can see working as required, except in the case of headlight is on, and indicator is on. The change over relay you've wired in would get signal from the indicator, and as it flashes would give power to the globe from the indicator, but as it flashes off, power comes from the headlight, which would cause the indicator to be constantly on when headlight is on, even while indicator change over is flashing. That is unless we don't care if it flashes or not if the headlight is on? I guess that's an OP clarification.
    • HI, Ive got an r34 gtt sedan A/T. The instrument cluster went out and I replaced it with another A/T everything visually looks the same and all the gauges work now with the exception of the speedometer and odometer. The speedo will stay pinned at zero until I'm going about 55kmh and then it'll say Im going about 5kmh. my odometer seems to be tracking at about a 1/10 of what it should. If I go 1km it'll say I've only gone 0.01. Appreciate any and all help. Ive tried searching through the forums reddit and a local fb group. The only info I think I've found is that some cars didnt come equipped with TCS (mind is) and the clusters may be different between those? I've also installed a brand new VSS and no joy obviously. TIA. 
    • what speedo healer did you use?  
    • Certainly. It is probably broken under the wire style clamp. At least that one is easier to get at than the front one.   Sounds like it isn't a major leak, I'd start with backing off the the water feed and return banjos into the turbos half a turn then tightening properly. Hardlines can still crack over time, either in the tube (particularly when turbos are changed if the banjo is siezed in the the tube) or at the brazed joins between the lines and the banjo fittings. A coolant system pressure test will reveal all. BTW you'd be able to get a sump without exchange, it will just cost more as they will have to source another stock one for the next customer. If you want to address the sump a much better option is something like this https://www.hioctanedirect.com/hi-octane-racing-sump-extension-nissan-rb26 that you weld in locally (and add the oil return fittings at the same time)
    • Pretty sure you are thinking of the throwout bearing there (which you should change when you change your clutch), when they are worn they will get quieter if you put your foot on the clutch. An input shaft bearing is turning/noisy at all times.
×
×
  • Create New...