Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The other cause of noise can be the pad grabbing on the rotor slot where the machining tollerances aren't very high (ala RDA which uses a diamond grind versus DBA's CNC). If you're running RDA (or any of the cheap Chinese trade servicing rotors that get made into slotted) try cutting a small shamfer on the leading edge of the pad (ie. the side of the pad that contacts the rotor slot first).

Funny, I'm using the DBA 4000s with HPX pads and haven't had any issues with noise.

They're relatively dusty, which sucks if you have white wheels, but they've been great.

  • Like 1

As you've proven, the cheaper rotors are machined to a lesser tolerance, so are more likely to be the cause of noise! ;)

this could be it, also thank you for sending me those anti squeal shims.

I must say im quite impressed with gsl rally's co operation in this matter. It has changed my mind from not wanting to buy from them again to almost certainly going with them if I need anything else. others take note - This is how customer service is done.

Cheers

Edited by tripsteady

That shouldn't happen anymore! We've now got some staff that will never venture to a rally, so should always be someone here manning the fort. Also we about to open an Adelaide branch, which will handle inquiries also and be completely separate to the rally team, so again, distancing our motorsport activities from our parts store! ;)

Still, its good to know we actually run on alot of what we promote!

  • 2 weeks later...

just an update , i put the anti squeal shims on the back pads only(as a user above pointed out that he replaced the pads int he rear and that solved the problem) The squeal is basically gone unless I drive very very hard. Very happy now :) Thanks gsl rally !

  • 2 weeks later...

Afternoon,

I'm doing a bit of research on some brake pads, I have an R32 GTST that is a weekender and will be seeing some drift days. I want to know what pads to run (mainly on the rear, to give good hand brake lock up). A concern I have is that pads that require heat to work well, I presume the odd handbrake in drifting isn't going to heat the pad well, is that right? So basically I'm asking what pads someone can recommend especially if they are in a similar situation (drifting a skyline).

If you need more info let me know, cheers

Skylines use a drum handbrake system that runs separate to the braking that the rear caliper does, and in doing so, do not use a brake "pad" per se.

To get the good lockups that you want, Project Mu make some brake shoes for the Skyline that should fit your needs nicely.

Skylines use a drum handbrake system that runs separate to the braking that the rear caliper does, and in doing so, do not use a brake "pad" per se.

To get the good lockups that you want, Project Mu make some brake shoes for the Skyline that should fit your needs nicely.

So the handbrake doesn't use the rear caliper?

Edit: so they basically have a drum set-up (like on old cars) and a caliper and rotor? So the caliper and rotor is used for braking whereas the drum is used for the handbrake?

Edited by Philr32

Answer: Yes, the handbrake setup on skylines (R32 onwards) is separate to the brakes which use a caliper and rotor.

Project Mu handbrake shoes are the go. Look up the sponsors here on SAU.

Lastly, this is the wrong thread to be asking questions like this ;)

  • 4 weeks later...

Are Ferodo DS2500 still a good pad for a track oriented car? They seem to have a good heat range, my car is used for drifting mainly with a hydraulic handbrake, but the car still gets driven on the street (to/from track) and some mountain driving / general track (grip) days.

Are Ferodo DS2500 still a good pad for a track oriented car? They seem to have a good heat range, my car is used for drifting mainly with a hydraulic handbrake, but the car still gets driven on the street (to/from track) and some mountain driving / general track (grip) days.

DS2500 is good for a street car that sometimes get used on the track. Sounds like you are using your car on track and for hard driving most of the time so I would recommend going with a track only pad rather than something like DS2500.

Ah I see, thank you for your help. Yep, car is 95% track, or if it's not on the track it's in the mountains anyway. What about QFM A1RM?

No probs, I have not used the A1RM myself but there is heaps of feedback on them on here. For track only pads I have used Hawk HT-10, DTC-60 and DTC-70, world of difference compared to street/track pads like the DS2500. 2500s are a good compromise pad which can still take a decent amount of abuse but nothing compared to a track pad.

In case you go for Hawks, I get them from here http://www.hawkpadsdirect.com/ since last I checked they are heaps cheaper than any local supplier.

When being used in competition, not very. We used the same 4000 series rotors for a season and a half, and they still had good thickness left. If it's being used as street pad only, it'll go through rotors fairly quickly.

Can someone please aware me of this statement?

For a track pad using it on the street does it chew through rotors becuase:

a. The amount of km's you do driving on the street

b. Because of the harshness of the pad it eats into the rotor when not up to temp

c. both a & b

d. None of the above

I'm just asking as I am about to use a track only pad for a daily that I will track once a month

Can someone please aware me of this statement?

For a track pad using it on the street does it chew through rotors becuase:

a. The amount of km's you do driving on the street

b. Because of the harshness of the pad it eats into the rotor when not up to temp

c. both a & b

d. None of the above

I'm just asking as I am about to use a track only pad for a daily that I will track once a month

Its mainly due to b - harshness when not up to temp.

You will tend to do that anyway since the noise from most track pads is so bad you try and avoid braking in general haha.

Intradasting...I better use my gears to slow me up more at the traffic lights then :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, the latter. No diff should have a centre replaced without checking clearances because its unlikely to be the same as whatever came out. Not that that stops most people just checking a new centre in
    • Major thread necro but how bad of a job is it to DIY? Looking at it online it looks like if you reuse your ring and pinion as long as those are in good condition it should be fine to just pull the axles/front cover and replace the diff that way? Or should I be replacing everything and doing preload measurements/gear mesh testing like the factory service manual mentions for the rear diff?
    • in my list I had the R33 GTR as the best Skyline. Infact I had all GTR's (33>34=32), the NSX, the GTO, the 300ZX, the 180SX, the S15 better than the FD RX7. I had the MR2 and the A80 as 'just' better. I also think the DC5R Integra looks better but this is an 01 onwards car. I also think the FC>FD. It's almost like aesthetics are individual! The elements @GTSBoy likes about the FD and dislikes about the 180 are inverse in my eyes. I hate the rear end of the FD and it's weird tail lights that are bulbous and remind me of early hyundai excels. They are not striking, nor iconic, nor retro cool. The GTO has supercar proportions. I maintain these look much better in person (like the NSX) especially with nice wheels and suspension which is mandatory for all cars pretty much. Some (or all) of these you have to see in person to appreciate. You can't write a car off until you see one in the flesh IMO. Like most people we probably just like/dislike cars which represent certain eras of design or design styles in general. I also think the 60's Jag E type looks HORRIBLE, literally disgusting, and the 2000GT is nothing to write home about. FWIW I don't think the Dodge Viper Gen1's have aged very well either. You can probably see where I rate bubbly coupes like the FD. I know we're straying now but the C4 and C5 absolutely murder the Viper in the looks department as time goes on, for my eyes. Wouldn't surprise me if people who love the FD, also love the MX5, Dodge Viper, Jag E Type, etc etc.
    • I used to hate R31s, and any of the other Nissans that led up to it, and any of the Toyotas with similar styling, because of the boxiness. They were, and remain, childish, simplistic, and generally awful. I appreciate R31s a lot more now, but only the JDM 2 door. The ADM 4 door (and any other 4 door, even if they are unique compared to our local one) can eat a bowl of dicks. The Aussie R31 is also forever tarnished by their association with stereotypical bong clutching Aussie R31 owners of the 90s and early 2000s. I think the Nissans of the 70s (other than 120Y/180B/200B) are far superior looking to the 80s cars. The 240K era Skylines are boss. The same is broadly true of Toyotas. Hondas don't ever register in my thinking, from any era. Mitsus are all horrid shitboxen in any era, and so also don't register. Subarus are always awful, ditto. Daihatsus and Suzukis also don't generally register. They are all invisible. I think the SW20 MR2 looks fiddly. The 3000GT/GTO is like that but way worse. Too many silly plastic barnacles and fiddly gimmicks ruined what could have been a really nice base shape. Kinda-sorta looks like a big heavy ST165 Celica coupe (and I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing). I think the 180SX is dreadfully bland. It's not bad looking. But it has no excitement to it at all. It's just a liftback coupe thing with no interest in its lines, and bad graphical elements (ie wide expanses of taillight plastic on the rear garnish). The S13 Silvia is a little better - getting closer to R32 shapes. But still....bland. S14? Nope. Don't love it. S15...a little better. Probably a lot better, actually. Benefits from not being like a shrunk in the wash R34 (where the S13 was a shrunk in the wash R32 and the S14 looked like a Pulsar or something else from the stable on Nissan mid 90s horrors). The Z32 was hot as f**k when it came out but hasn't aged as well as the A80. Keep in mind that I think the R33 is the most disgusting looking thing - and out of all the previous cars mentioned is objectively closest to my precious R32. It's just....real bad, almost everywhere you look. And that is down to the majority of what was designed in the 90s being shit. All Nissans from that era look like shit. Most other brands ditto. In that context, the FD absolutely stands out as being by far the best looking car, for reasons already discussed. Going behind the aesthetics, the suspension alone makes it better than almost any other car.  
    • If they just called it the "Mazda Tiffany", it would have been spot on.
×
×
  • Create New...